A Comparison of Three Fluoroquinolone Topical Eyedrops in the Treatment of Infectious Corneal Ulcers. (Eye02)

August 11, 2015 updated by: Cornea Consultants Of Nashville

A Single-site, Single Masked, Prospective Comparison of Three Fluoroquinolone Topical Therapies (Besifloxacin 0.6% or Gatifloxacin 0.5% or Moxifloxacin 0.5%) in the Treatment of Infectious Corneal Ulcers.

This Phase II study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of three fluoroquinolone ophthalmic agents to determine the optimal treatment in patients with infectious corneal ulcers.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, single masked, comparative, mono-therapeutic trial evaluating three fluoroquinolone agents that are approved and marketed for the treatment of conjunctivitis. Approximately 120 patients who have corneal ulcers greater than 2 mm but less than 6 mm in size who meet all other inclusion criteria will be enrolled into this study. Patients will be randomized in a 2:1:1 ratio to receive besifloxacin 0.6% ophthalmic suspension, gatifloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution, or moxifloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
        • Cornea Consultants of Nashville

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients must be between the ages of 18-90 years of age.
  2. Patients must be able to understand the nature of this study, give written informed consent prior to study entry, and comply with study requirements.
  3. Patients must have a corneal ulcer greater than 2mm but less than 6mm in size.
  4. Patients must have corneal ulcer present in only one eye.
  5. Patients must agree not to wear contact lenses while on study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with multifocal ulcers.
  2. Signs of any other viral or fungal infection.
  3. Treatment with antibiotics within 14 days of study entry.
  4. Treatment with systemic or topical ocular antiviral agents or systemic or topical steroids or topical ocular nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) during the prior 14-day period.
  5. Known hypersensitivity or allergy to steroids (Loteprednol etabonate) or to any of the ingredients in the three study drugs (Besifloxacin 0.6% or Gatifloxacin 0.5% or Moxifloxacin 0.5%).
  6. Contact lens only with no spectacles available.
  7. Ocular surgery (including laser surgery) in either eye within 6 weeks prior to entry into this study.
  8. Participation in any investigational study within the past 30 days.
  9. Pregnant women, minors, or those not able to consent for themselves.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Besivance 0.6% Ophthalmic Suspension
A topical fluoroquinolone antimicrobial indicated for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.
Drug: Besivance 0.6% Ophthalmic Suspension
Drop to be applied in affected eye initially every hour for the first 48 hours then doses will be reduced at each subsequent visit by 50% if patient continues to show a reduction in size of 25% from the previous visit up to every 4 hours. If subject dose has been reduced to every 4 hours at visit 3 and shows an additional reduction size of 25% at visit 4, then they will be reduced to every 6 hours.
Other Names:
  • Besifloxacin 0.6% Ophthalmic Suspension
Active Comparator: Zymaxid 0.5% Ophthalmic Solution
A topical fluoroquinolone anti-infective indicated for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.
Drug: Zymaxid 0.5% Ophthalmic Solution
Drop to be applied in affected eye initially every hour for the first 48 hours then doses will be reduced at each subsequent visit by 50% if patient continues to show a reduction in size of 25% from the previous visit up to every 4 hours. If subject dose has been reduced to every 4 hours at visit 3 and shows an additional reduction size of 25% at visit 4, then they will be reduced to every 6 hours.
Other Names:
  • Gatifloxacin 0.5% Ophthalmic Solution
Active Comparator: Vigamox 0.5% Ophthalmic Solution
A topical fluoroquinolone anti-infective indicated for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.
Drug: Vigamox 0.5% Ophthalmic Solution
Drop to be applied in affected eye initially every hour for the first 48 hours then doses will be reduced at each subsequent visit by 50% if patient continues to show a reduction in size of 25% from the previous visit up to every 4 hours. If subject dose has been reduced to every 4 hours at visit 3 and shows an additional reduction size of 25% at visit 4, then they will be reduced to every 6 hours.
Other Names:
  • Moxifloxacin Hydrochloride 0.5% Ophthalmic Solution

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete Healing
Time Frame: 29 days
The primary outcome will be complete healing of the corneal ulcer, defined as complete reepithelialization by Day 29.
29 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Healing Rate
Time Frame: 29 days
Time to corneal ulcer reduction and/or total healing over a treatment course of 21 days.
29 days

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Treatment Failure.
Time Frame: 8 days
If there is no reduction in size of the corneal ulcer by day 8, the treatment will be deemed a failure and alternative medications will be given at the discretion of the investigator.
8 days
Scarring
Time Frame: 29 days
Scarring will be evaluated and measured in millimeters at Day 29 and classified as either peripheral or central.
29 days
Patient Satisfaction Scores
Time Frame: Average of 6 times in a 29 day period
Patient satisfaction outcomes will be assessed using a series of survey questions ranging in both categorical and continuous outcomes. Treatment will be compared using either methods for differences in binomial proportions or the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. Scale= 0- Very Comfortable, 1- Comfortable, 2- Uncomfortable, 3- Very Uncomfortable
Average of 6 times in a 29 day period
Patient Pain Scores
Time Frame: Average of 6 times in a 29 day period
Patients will be asked to grade the overall pain of the affected eye at each visit on a Scale= 0--None, 1- Mild, 2- Moderate, 3- Severe
Average of 6 times in a 29 day period
Number of Participants With Treatment Failure
Time Frame: 29 days
29 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cornea Consultants Of Nashville

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
SCRI Development Innovations, LLC

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ira A. Shivitz, M.D., Cornea Consultants of Nashville

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 20, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 21, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 27, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 13, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 11, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Eye02

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Corneal Ulcers

Clinical Trials on Besivance 0.6% Ophthalmic Suspension

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings