Compare Efficacy of CHOP Versus Fractionated ICED in Transplant-eligible Patients With Previously Untreated PTCL

October 21, 2020 updated by: Won Seog Kim, Samsung Medical Center

Randomized Phase II Study to Compare Efficacy of CHOP Versus Fractionated ICED in Transplant-eligible Patients With Previously Untreated Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma

This study is a Randomized Phase II Study to Compare Efficacy of CHOP versus Fractionated ICED in Transplant-eligible Patients with Previously Untreated Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

It recommends that the CHOP regimen in the primary T-cell lymphoma therapies currently used but did not get satisfactory effect of therapy (progression-free survival 40%), primarily to consider the clinical trial at NCCN guideline.But why the CHOP regimen is widely used because physicians are accustomed to use. Fractionated ICED therapy is a therapy by adjusting the Original ICE regimen.This is how the capacity of Ifosfamide divided into three days. (Fractionated ifosfamide).Original ICE therapy has been widely used as a salvage therapy of patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma for a long time, it has been recommended as part of primary therapy of T-cell lymphoma.But Fractionated ICED is added to dexamethasone therapy in order to improve the effectiveness as a primary therapy.The recurrent lymphoma in 75 patients with treatment after Fractionated ICE when the self-stem cell transplantation, showed a more than 40% progression-free survival.Thus treatment of Fractionated ICED targeting previously untreated patients, and if a combination of high-dose dexamethasone to expect to be able to induce a progression-free survival of 60% or more.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
134

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
    • Seoul, Korea, Republic Of
      • Seoul, Seoul, Korea, Republic Of, Korea, Republic of, 135-710
        • Recruiting
        • Samsung Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Seok Jin Kim, M.D,Ph. D
          • Phone Number: 82 234101766
          • Email: kstwoh@skku.edu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 19-65 years
  2. Informed consent
  3. Subject able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.

  4. Histologically proven Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma,No prior chemotherapy for the treatment of Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma It includes the following subtypes.

    • PTCL, not otherwise specified
    • Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma
    • Anaplastic large cell lymphoma, ALK-negative type
    • Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma
    • Hepato-splenic T-cell lymphoma
    • Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma
    • Primary cutaneous gamma-delta T-cell lymphoma
    • Primary cutaneous CD8+ aggressive epidermotropic lymphoma
    • Other non classifiable T-cell Lymphoma
  5. Performance status (ECOG) 0,1 or 2
  6. A negative pregnancy test prior to treatment must be available both for pre-menopausal women
  7. Female of childbearing potential (FCBP) must: contraceptive methods (oral, injectable, or implantable hormonal contraceptive; tubal ligation; intra-uterine device; barrier contraceptive with spermicide; or vasectomized partner) while on IP; and for 3 months following the last dose of IP.Male subjects must practice true abstinence or agree to use a condom during sexual contact with a pregnant female or a female of childbearing potential while participating in the study, during dose interruptions, and for 3 months following IP discontinuation.
  8. life expectancy≥90day(3months)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Other serious medical illnesses or psychiatric disorders
  2. Any state that the confusion in the interpretation of test result.
  3. Other type lymphoma ex) B-cell lymphoma

  4. Other type T-cell lymphoma

    • Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma
    • NK/T-cell Lymphoma, Nasal Type
    • ALK-Positive Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma
    • Cutaneous Tcell lymphoma
    • primary cutaneous CD30+ lympho- proliferative disorder
    • primary cutaneous Anaplastic T cell lymphoma
  5. Previously treated for PTCL(Except for a short period before randomization of corticosteroids (a period of not more than 8 days)
  6. Previous radiation therapy
  7. CNS involvement.
  8. If the contraindication to chemoherapy
  9. Subject has known historical or active infection with HIV.
  10. BM function: ANC < 1.5 × 109/L; Platelet count <100,000/mm2 (100 × 109/L), SGOT/AST or SGPT/ALT ≥ 3.0 x ULN, Bilirubin> 2 x upper normal value
  11. serum creatinine level > 2.0 x ULN
  12. Any other malignancies within the past 3 years except curatively treated non-melanoma skin cancer or in situ carcinoma of cervix uteri
  13. MUGA scan <45%
  14. Those who administered doxorubicin exceeding 200 mg / m2
  15. Subject has active, uncontrolled bacterial, viral, or fungal infection(s) requiring systemic therapy.
  16. Breast-feeding or pregnant female

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: CHOP
cyclophosphamide, 750mg/m² IV day1 doxorubicin, 50 mg/m² IV day1 vincristine, 1.4 mg/m² (max 2 mg) IV day1 prednisone ,40 mg/m² PO day1~5 every 3 weeks
Drug: CHOP
cyclophosphamide, 750mg/m² IV day1 doxorubicin, 50 mg/m² IV day1 vincristine, 1.4 mg/m² (max 2 mg) IV day1 prednisone ,40 mg/m² PO day1~5 every 3 weeks
Other Names:
  • cyclophosphamide, cyclophosphamide, vincristine,prednisone
Drug: fractionated ICED
ifosfamide, 1.67 g/m² IV day1~3 carboplatin, AUC =5 IV day1 etoposide, 100mg/m² IV day1~3 dexamethasone 40 mg PO or IV day1~4 every 3 weeks
Other Names:
  • ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide, dexamethasone
Experimental: Fractionated ICED
ifosfamide, 1.67 g/m² IV day1~3 carboplatin, AUC =5 IV day1 etoposide, 100mg/m² IV day1~3 dexamethasone 40 mg PO or IV day1~4 every 3 weeks
Drug: CHOP
cyclophosphamide, 750mg/m² IV day1 doxorubicin, 50 mg/m² IV day1 vincristine, 1.4 mg/m² (max 2 mg) IV day1 prednisone ,40 mg/m² PO day1~5 every 3 weeks
Other Names:
  • cyclophosphamide, cyclophosphamide, vincristine,prednisone
Drug: fractionated ICED
ifosfamide, 1.67 g/m² IV day1~3 carboplatin, AUC =5 IV day1 etoposide, 100mg/m² IV day1~3 dexamethasone 40 mg PO or IV day1~4 every 3 weeks
Other Names:
  • ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide, dexamethasone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
progression free survival
Time Frame: 3 years
Time to disease progression is defined as the time from treatment start to the first recording of relapse or disease progression or death of any cause
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 3 years
Duration of survival is defined as the time from treatment start to death of any cause or the date of last follow-up. Subjects who are alive will be censored using the date at which they are last known to be alive
3 years
overall response rate
Time Frame: 3 years
They should be classified as complete remission(CR),Partial remission(PR),Stable disease(SD), or progression disease(PD)according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma
3 years
Response duration
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
Toxicity profiles
Time Frame: 3 years
Toxicity profiles as measured by Adverse Events and Laboratory results.
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Samsung Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Won Seog Kim, MD,Ph.D., Samsung Medical Center,Seoul,Korea

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 23, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 12, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 12, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 15, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 21, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2014-12-011

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma

Clinical Trials on CHOP

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings