Aquatic Therapy for Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease Patients (AT-FOG)

December 27, 2017 updated by: Ospedale Generale Di Zona Moriggia-Pelascini

Effectiveness of Aquatic Therapy for Parkinson's Disease Patients in the Context of a Multidisciplinary, Intensive Rehabilitation Treatment

Evaluation of the effectiveness of aquatic therapy for the treatment of freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease patients undergoing a multidisciplinary and intensive rehabilitation treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Freezing of gait (FoG) is an often dramatic, disabling episodic gait pattern that is common in Parkinson's disease (PD). FoG highly impairs mobility, causes falls, and reduces quality of life. Given the limited effectiveness of both the dopaminergic therapy and the deep brain stimulation on this symptom, it represents a challenge in the field of rehabilitation. In the last years, some studies described the effectiveness of aquatic therapy on balance dysfunction in patients with PD, correlating it to the safe conditions offered by the aquatic environment and to the physical properties of water. Nevertheless, the issues concerning the feasibility and the effectiveness of aquatic therapy for the treatment of FoG have never been addressed before. The aquatic environment may act on the sensorial peripheral receptors, thus widely stimulating the proprioceptive system. PD patients show an altered processing of the proprioceptive information that could potentially underline FoG. The investigators aim at investigating the effects of aquatic therapy for the treatment of FoG in PD patients undergoing a Multidisciplinary Intensive Rehabilitation Treatment (MIRT), whose effectiveness on several motor and functional parameters has been already demonstrated.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
    • Como
      • Gravedona Ed Uniti, Como, Italy, 22015
        • "Moriggia-Pelascini" Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of PD according to Gelb et al;
  • Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) stage 2.5-3;
  • Presence of FOG confirmed in the patient assessment prior to participation in the study;
  • Stable pharmacological treatment for the last 8 weeks and during the rehabilitation period;
  • Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 24;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiac, pulmonary, vestibular and orthopedic diseases;
  • Urinary incontinence;
  • Severe dyskinesias;
  • Patients treated with deep brain stimulation;
  • Visual deficits;
  • Comorbilities other than PD determining reduction of motor autonomy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: MIRT
Patients in this group will undergo a 4-week Multidisciplinary Intensive Rehabilitation Treatment (MIRT).
Other: MIRT
MIRT consists of a 4-week rehabilitation program in a hospital setting, which entails four daily sessions of physical therapy for five days and one hour of physical exercise on the sixth day. On the seventh day the patient rests. The duration of each session, including recovery periods, is about one hour. The first session consists of a one-to-one session with a physical therapist. The second session includes aerobic exercises to improve balance and gait, using different devices: a stabilometric platform with visual cues, a treadmill plus and a cycloergometer. The third session consists of occupational therapy, the fourth one includes one hour of speech therapy.
Active Comparator: MIRT-AT
Patients in this group will undergo a 4-week Multidisciplinary Intensive Rehabilitation Treatment associated with Aquatic Therapy (MIRT-AT).
Other: MIRT-AT
Patients in the MIRT-AT group will undergo the land-based therapy described in MIRT plus three sessions per week (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) of aquatic therapy. On days of aquatic therapy the first session of MIRT was not provided. The aquatic therapy program included aerobic exercises and physical activities to improve balance, motor skills, coordination and joints mobility. The water sessions were divided into 3 phases: i) Warm Up Exercises, ii) Central session Training, iii) Cool-down.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOGQ)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assess FoG frequency, disturbances in gait and relationship to clinical features conceptually associated with gait and motor aspects.
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale tot (UPDRS tot)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Clinician-scored monitored patient's global evaluation.
4 weeks
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS III)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
UPDRS subpart: clinician-scored monitored patient's motor evaluation
4 weeks
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part II (UPDRS II)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
UPDRS subart: clinician-scored monitored patient's activitied daily life evaluation
4 weeks
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Motor-functional test for balance evaluation
4 weeks
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Motor-functional test for sit to stand, walking and turning evaluation
4 weeks
Six Minutes Walking Test (6MWT)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Motor-functional test for gait endurance
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ospedale Generale Di Zona Moriggia-Pelascini

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Giuseppe Frazzitta, MD, "Moriggia-Pelascini" Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 7, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 27, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • "Moriggia-Pelascini" Hospital

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on MIRT

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings