Prospective RCT Lidocaine & Levobupivacaine on Block Dynamics After Subparaneural Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block

April 9, 2025 updated by: Prof Manoj K Karmakar, Chinese University of Hong Kong

A Prospective Randomized Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Levobupivacaine on Block Dynamics After a Subparaneural Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block

Sciatic nerve block at the popliteal fossa is indicated for foot or ankle surgery, and the introduction of ultrasound guidance (USG) has improved the ease and accuracy of the performance of this block. Recent studies proved that subparaneural injection is associated with faster block onset, higher block success rate, and prolonged block duration suggesting subparaneural compartment of the sciatic nerve is a desirable site for local anaesthetic injection. Data from an ongoing trial in the investigator's institution comparing the block dynamics of subparaneural injection of 30ml 0.5% levobupivacaine (Chirocaine) above and below the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve at popliteal fossa has also shown that the time to 'readiness for surgery' was faster when the injection was performed below the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve. Lidocaine (Xylocaine) has a better pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics profile than levobupivacaine and is also widely used as local anaesthetic agent in clinical practice. Since there is no data comparing the block dynamics of lidocaine and levobupivacaine, this study aims to study and compare the block dynamics of lidocaine and levobupivacaine when given as a subparaneural injection below the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve at the popliteal fossa. In this study, the investigator hypothesizes that the use of lidocaine as the sole agent for this block will fasten the time to 'readiness for surgery' as compared to levobupivacaine when given as a subparaneural injection below the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve at the popliteal fossa.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study will involve performing ultrasound guided subparaneural popliteal sciatic nerve block for 40 patients by using either Lidocaine or Levobupivacaine. Both are commonly used local anaesthetics for regional anaesthesia in daily clinical practice. Patients will be enrolled from the elective orthopaedic surgical list at Prince of Wales Hospital after informed consent.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Hong Kong
    • New Territories
      • Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Prince of Wales Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
  • adult and scheduled to undergo elective forefoot surgery under regional anaesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient refusal
  • ASA physical status > III
  • pregnancy
  • neuromuscular disorder
  • prior surgery in the popliteal fossa
  • coagulopathy
  • allergy to local anaesthetic drugs
  • skin infection at the site of needle insertion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Levobupivacaine
0.5% levobupivacaine (0.5% Chirocaine) 30ml (150mg) will be injected once for regional anaesthesia before surgery
Drug: 0.5% Levobupivacaine
The plane where the sciatic nerve bifurcates will at first be identified by utlrasound. 22-gauge insulated nerve block needle will be inserted in the short axis (out-of-plane) of the ultrasound transducer, and advanced toward the cleavage between the common peroneal nerve and the tibial nerve, which is the easiest location for needle access into subparaneural compartment.Once the needle tip enters the subparaneural compartment 2-3 ml of normal saline will be injected (hydro-distension) to create a halo around both the common peroneal nerve and tibial nerve distally and the sciatic nerve proximally. The needle is then redirected to place its tip into the paraneural sheath of the common peroneal and tibial nerve through the same skin puncture and 15ml of study drug will be injected at each site (total 30ml).
Other Names:
  • Chirocaine
Active Comparator: Xylocaine + adrenaline
2% Xylocaine with adrenaline 1:200,000 30ml (450mg) will be injected once for regional anaesthesia before surgery
Drug: 2% Xylocaine with adrenaline 1:200,000
The plane where the sciatic nerve bifurcates will at first be identified by utlrasound. 22-gauge insulated nerve block needle will be inserted in the short axis (out-of-plane) of the ultrasound transducer, and advanced toward the cleavage between the common peroneal nerve and the tibial nerve, which is the easiest location for needle access into subparaneural compartment.Once the needle tip enters the subparaneural compartment 2-3 ml of normal saline will be injected (hydro-distension) to create a halo around both the common peroneal nerve and tibial nerve distally and the sciatic nerve proximally. The needle is then redirected to place its tip into the paraneural sheath of the common peroneal and tibial nerve through the same skin puncture and 15ml of study drug will be injected at each site (total 30ml).
Other Names:
  • Lignocaine and Adrenaline
  • Lidocaine and Adrenaline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete sensory blockade
Time Frame: assessed within the first 30 minutes
Proportion of patients achieving complete sensory blockade (sensory score=0) at 30 minutes; Sensory score: VRS 0-100; 0=no sensation, 100=normal sensation
assessed within the first 30 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete motor blockade
Time Frame: assessed within the first 50 minutes after nerve block at regular intervals (5min, 10min, 15min, 20min, 25min, 30min, 40min, 50min)
Proportion of patients achieving complete motor blockade (motor score=0); Motor score: VRS 0-2; 2=normal, 1=paresis, 0=paralysis
assessed within the first 50 minutes after nerve block at regular intervals (5min, 10min, 15min, 20min, 25min, 30min, 40min, 50min)
Time to readiness for surgery
Time Frame: assessed within the first 50 minutes after nerve block at regular intervals (5min, 10min, 15min, 20min, 25min, 30min, 40min, 50min)
Sensory score =<30 and motor score=<1
assessed within the first 50 minutes after nerve block at regular intervals (5min, 10min, 15min, 20min, 25min, 30min, 40min, 50min)
Time to complete sensory and motor block
Time Frame: assessed within the first 50 minutes after nerve block at regular intervals (5min, 10min, 15min, 20min, 25min, 30min, 40min, 50min)
Sensory score =0 and motor score=0
assessed within the first 50 minutes after nerve block at regular intervals (5min, 10min, 15min, 20min, 25min, 30min, 40min, 50min)
Paresthesia
Time Frame: Intraoperative (during the period of undergoing the nerve block)
Any incidence of paresthesia during the nerve block
Intraoperative (during the period of undergoing the nerve block)
complications
Time Frame: after the nerve block till the end of surgery
Any complications during and right after the nerve block directly related to local anaesthetic toxicity
after the nerve block till the end of surgery
Discomfort score
Time Frame: assess once 1 day before surgery
the degree of discomfort during the nerve block (NRS : 0-100; 0=no discomfort, 100 very uncomfortable)
assess once 1 day before surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Chinese University of Hong Kong

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Manoj K Karmakar, MD, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 20, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 13, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 9, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2020.127-T

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions

Clinical Trials on 0.5% Levobupivacaine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings