Relationship Between Perioperative Treatment Efficacy and The Tumor Microenvironment for Locally Advanced Resectable Gastric Cancer.

May 25, 2025 updated by: Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

An Observational Study of Relationship Between Perioperative Treatment Efficacy and The Tumor Microenvironment for Locally Advanced Resectable Gastric and Gastro-oesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

Perioperative drug treatment has gradually become the standard regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer, whereas only a subset of patients could benefit from it. Therefore, one major challenge for perioperative drug treatment is to construct promising biomarkers and to screen out potential beneficial patients. Recent evidence has revealed that tumor microenvironment (TME) is highly associated with the prognosis of gastric cancer. Meanwhile, tumor microenvironment score (TMEscore) established with transcriptomic data is a robust biomarker for predicting prognosis and guiding individualized immunotherapy strategies. However, its predictive value for perioperative drug treatment outcomes warrants further exploration and validation. The study is a multi-center, observational study to evaluate the relationship between the efficacy of perioperative treatment and tumor microenvironment in patients with locally advanced resectable gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, aiming at further determining the predictive value of TMEscore and establishing a comprehensive treatment-efficacy evaluation system for gastric cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Perioperative drug treatment has gradually become the standard regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer, whereas only a subset of patients could benefit from it. Therefore, one major challenge for perioperative drug treatment is to construct promising biomarkers and to screen out potential beneficial patients. Recent evidence has revealed that tumor microenvironment (TME) is highly associated with the prognosis of gastric cancer. Meanwhile, tumor microenvironment score (TMEscore) established with transcriptomic data is a robust biomarker for predicting prognosis and guiding individualized immunotherapy strategies. However, its predictive value for perioperative drug treatment outcomes warrants further exploration and validation. The study is a multi-center, observational study to evaluate the relationship between the efficacy of perioperative treatment and tumor microenvironment in patients with locally advanced resectable gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, aiming at further determining the predictive value of TMEscore and establishing a comprehensive treatment-efficacy evaluation system for gastric cancer. Eligible subjects were selected according to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. After the successful screening, the patients were treated in accordance with the clinical guidelines and the actual conditions. The residual tissue samples of the primary tumor were collected to conduct the tumor microenvironment detection. After routine neoadjuvant therapy, followed by a restaging of the tumor status and surgery. The residual surgical specimens were collected to conduct the tumor microenvironment detection analysis.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
169

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510515
        • Recruiting
        • Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Wangjun Liao, MD, PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced resectable gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced resectable gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma at the stage of cT2-T4aNxM0 (AJCC 8th) without distant metastases and without infiltration of adjacent structures and organs.
  2. 18-75 years old.
  3. Willing to provide residual tumor tissues after routine clinical diagnosis for tumor microenvironment detection analysis.
  4. Patients agree to participate in the study and sign the informed consent.
  5. Patients need to receive perioperative drug therapy.
  6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0 to 1.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is positive, that is, tissue immunohistochemical staining (IHC) (3+) or IHC (2+), and tissue fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is positive.
  2. Patients with major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (such as congestive heart failure, unstable heart colic, atrial fibrillation, stroke, transient ischemic attack, etc.).
  3. Allergies or contraindications to common chemotherapy drugs, immunotherapy drugs or the ingredients.
  4. Women who are pregnant, breast-feeding.
  5. Other conditions the investigator believes that it is not suitable to participate in this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major pathologic response (MPR) rate
Time Frame: From the initiation date of first cycle to the date of surgery, an average of 10 weeks
Defined as <10% residual viable tumor cells in the resection specimen after neoadjuvant drug treatment.
From the initiation date of first cycle to the date of surgery, an average of 10 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pathological complete response (pCR) rate
Time Frame: From the initiation date of first cycle to the date of surgery, an average of 10 weeks
Defined as the percentage of participants having a pathological complete response.
From the initiation date of first cycle to the date of surgery, an average of 10 weeks
R0 resection rate
Time Frame: From the initiation date of first cycle to the date of surgery, an average of 10 weeks
Rate of microscopically margin-negative resection.
From the initiation date of first cycle to the date of surgery, an average of 10 weeks
Disease-free Survival (DFS)
Time Frame: 3 years
Defined as the time from post-surgery baseline scan until the first occurrence of local/distant recurrence or death from any cause and is based on RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the investigator.
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 25, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 25, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NFEC-2021-082

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Adenocarcinoma

Clinical Trials on non-intervention

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings