Evaluation of Droplet Digital PCR Rapid Detection Method and Precise Diagnosis and Treatment for Suspected Sepsis

July 8, 2025 updated by: Wen-hong Zhang, Huashan Hospital
Sepsis is a significant public health concern worldwide, with high morbidity and mortality. With regard to a targeted antimicrobial treatment strategy, the earliest possible pathogen detection is of crucial importance. Until now, culture-based detection methods represent the diagnostic gold standard, although they are characterized by numerous limitations. Culture-independent molecular diagnostic procedures may represent a promising alternative. In particular, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a novel one-step PCR assay that achieves higher accuracy and sensitivity in detecting causing pathogens in patients with bloodstream infections.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1032

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, China, 230022
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, China, 410013
        • Xiangya Hospital Central South University
    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210001
        • Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine
      • Wuxi, Jiangsu, China, 214016
        • Wuxi No.5 People's Hospital
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200233
        • Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200092
        • Xinhua Hospital Affliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 201100
        • Minhang Branch of Ruijin Hospital
    • Zhejiang
      • Rui'an, Zhejiang, China, 325200
        • Zhejiang Rui'an People's Hospital
      • Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China, 325000
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1.18 years or older

2.Meet 2 of 4 sepsis criteria

  1. Temperature > 38C or < 36C
  2. Heart rate > 90 bpm
  3. Respiratory rate >20 or PaCO2 <32mmHg
  4. WBC >12000/µL or < 4000/µL or > 10% bands

    3.Hospitalized patients who have a diagnostic blood culture ordered as standard of care for suspected sepsis

    4.Informed Consent by patient or legal representative.

    Exclusion Criteria:

    1. Refusal to participate in the study or Failure to comply with treatment or follow-up time
    2. Known breastfeeding or pregnancy
    3. The researcher believes that there are any conditions (social or medical) that allow subjects to participate is unsafe. For example, severe anemia or high risk of bleeding,etc., which are not suitable for taking peripheral blood for testing
    4. Participating in other clinical studies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: droplet digital PCR method
Pathogen detection by droplet digital PCR method as an adjunct to traditional microbiological assessments including blood culture
The droplet digital PCR method can detect nucleic acids from the most common pathogens (approximately 90%) responsible for BSIs according to Chinet2020 and takes about 4 hours to perform, reporting within the first 24h of suspected sepsis/septic shock.
Active Comparator: blood culture only
Pathogen detection by microbiological assessments including blood culture
Blood culture is a conventional microbiological method of pathogen detection. Results from blood cultures are usually not available until 24 to 72 hours after sampling.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity
Time Frame: Up to 96 hours post blood collection
The primary endpoint of estimated sensitivity will be determined by comparing positive blood culture results with the concomitantly collected ddPCR results from the prospective clinical specimens.
Up to 96 hours post blood collection
Specificity
Time Frame: Up to 96 hours post blood collection
The primary endpoint of estimated specificity will be determined by comparing negative blood culture results with the concomitantly collected ddPCR results from the prospective clinical specimens.
Up to 96 hours post blood collection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to the change to the targeted antimicrobial therapy
Time Frame: At time point of change to the targeted antimicrobial therapy, up to 96 hours post blood collection
At time point of change to the targeted antimicrobial therapy, up to 96 hours post blood collection
Number of patients with targeted antimicrobial therapy
Time Frame: Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
Time to identification of a potential pathogen
Time Frame: At time point of identification of a potential pathogen, up to 96 hours post blood collection
At time point of identification of a potential pathogen, up to 96 hours post blood collection
Duration of antimicrobials
Time Frame: Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
Change in condition severity
Time Frame: Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
The sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA score), previously known as the sepsis-related organ failure assessment score, higher scores mean worse outcome.
Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
Days in intensive care unit (ICU)
Time Frame: Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
Ventilation duration in ICU (hours)
Time Frame: Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
Days in hospital (from study inclusion)
Time Frame: Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
All-cause death
Time Frame: Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
Treatment costs
Time Frame: Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
Quality of life of survivors after being discharged
Time Frame: Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
EQ-5D, a standardised measure of health-related quality of life developed by the EuroQol Group.The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. The number of levels in these dimensions is 5 in the EQ-5D-5L. Higher levels mean worse health states.
Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 29, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 29, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 29, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PROGRESS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on droplet digital PCR method

Search Similar Trials