Hematologic Response of Epoetin Alfa (PROCRIT) Versus Darbepoetin Alfa (ARANESP) in Chemotherapy Induced Anemia

May 17, 2011 updated by: Ortho Biotech Products, L.P.

A Randomized, Open-Label Study Of Epoetin Alfa (PROCRIT) Versus Darbepoetin Alfa (ARANESP) To Evaluate Hematologic Response Rate In Anemic Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

The purpose of this study is to compare hemoglobin (Hgb) response rates between epoetin alfa (PROCRIT; 40,000 Units (U) SC weekly) and darbepoetin alfa (ARANESP; 200 mcg every other week) in anemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Chemotherapy related anemia occurs in a majority of cancer patients and can cause impaired treatment outcomes, increased treatment-related complications and altered quality of life. Epoetin alfa administered on a weekly dosing schedule of 40,000 Units subcutaneously ([SC], under the skin) with dose adjustments based on hematologic response produces significant improvement in hemoglobin levels, decreased transfusion frequency and improved quality of life. It is unknown if the recently developed agent, darbepoetin alfa, administered on an every other week fixed dose will produce similar improvements in hematologic and quality of life outcomes. Thus, further randomization studies are warranted utilizing once weekly dosing (QW) of Epoetin alfa compared to once every other week (Q2W) darbepoetin alfa. Patients will receive study medications for up to 16 weeks.Safety & efficacy evaluations will be performed at specified intervals throughout the study.The study hypothesis is that the Week 5 hemoglobin response rate in the Epoetin alfa group is better than that in the Darbepoetin alfa group. The starting dose for study drug is either Epoetin alfa (PROCRIT) 40,000 Units SC QW or Darbepoetin alfa (ARANESP) 200 mcg SC Q2W. Doses may be adjusted depending on the patient's hemoglobin levels up a maximum of 60,000 IU SC QW Epoetin alfa or 300 mcg SC Q2W Darbepoetin alfa.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

358

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed diagnosis of a solid tumor malignancy
  • Baseline hemoglobin value of <11 g/dL
  • Scheduled to receive cyclic chemotherapy for a minimum of 12 weeks
  • < 2 prior chemotherapy regimens in a metastatic setting
  • Adequate hematologic & renal function and platelet count >100,000/mm3
  • Estimated life expectancy of > 6 months
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status 0 - 2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of stem cell or bone marrow transplant
  • Anemia due to factors other than cancer/chemotherapy
  • Prior treatment with epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa or any investigational forms of erythropoietin within the previous 3 months
  • Significant, uncontrolled disease/dysfunction of the pulmonary, cardiovascular, endocrine, neurologic, gastrointestinal, or genitourinary systems not attributable to underlying malignancy or chemotherapy
  • Uncontrolled hypertension or recent history (within 6 months) of uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias, pulmonary embolism, thrombosis
  • new onset of seizures
  • history of second active malignancy
  • Major infection requiring hospitalization and antibiotics within 14 days of randomization
  • Transfusion of white blood cells or packed red blood cells within 28 days of randomization.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
The primary efficacy endpoint will evaluate the proportion of patients achieving >1 g/dL hemoglobin increase by week 5.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
1) time to hemoglobin (Hgb) increase of 1g/dL; 2) proportion of pts achieving a >1 g/dL Hgb increase by Wk 9; 3) proportion of pts achieving a >2g/dL Hgb increase by Wk 9; 4) Hgb values over time; 5) cumulative RBC transfusion Wk 5 to end of study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2003

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2004

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2006

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 18, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 19, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2011

Last Verified

April 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anemia

Clinical Trials on Epoetin alfa and Darbepoetin alfa

3
Subscribe