Mechanical vs. Alcohol Separation of the Corneal Epithelium During Surface Ablation Refractive Procedures

June 13, 2018 updated by: Medical University of South Carolina

A recent survey of trends among the members of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery determined that laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is the leading surgical procedure for photorefractive corrections ranging from -0 to 3 diopters (D).1 The same survey, however, showed a clear trend of participating refractive surgeons toward surface ablation. Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) was the first refractive surgery procedure approved and performed using the excimer laser. Several techniques of epithelial debridement have been tried with PRK-type surgery including mechanical debridement, laser transepithelial ablation, a rotating brush, and alcohol debridement.

The Amadeus II microkeratome (Advanced Medical Optics Inc, Irvine, CA, USA) used for the creation of a LASIK flap has an upgradeable platform that will allow the user to perform mechanical separation of the corneal epithelium before photorefractive treatments. With the use of this device, the corneal epithelium can be separated from the underlying stroma without previous preparation of the corneal surface with alcohol. The separated epithelial sheet can either be removed or replaced on the operated cornea after photoablation. This surgical procedure, which has been called Epi-LASIK, represents an advanced alternative surface ablation photorefractive procedure for the correction of ametropia. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical visual outcomes, healing rates, and patient satisfaction when performing surface ablation procedures using mechanical vs. alcohol separation of the epithelium.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

10

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Magill Laser Center, Medical University of South Carolina

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject must be a candidate for surface ablation procedures in both eyes.
  • ≥ 18 years of age or older.
  • Myopia ≤ -6.00 D.
  • Astigmatism ≤ - 3.00 D.
  • Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) of -6.00 D.
  • Capable of wearing a bandage contact lens.
  • Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits and other study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of ocular pathology.
  • Very large pupils (greater than 8mm diameter, infrared measurement).
  • Thin corneas (preoperatively calculated minimal residual bed < 250 um).
  • If patient fit into the group of the usual exclusionary criteria (e.g. irregular astigmatism, asymmetric astigmatism, unstable refraction - most of these patients would not typically be considered LASIK candidates under normal circumstances).
  • History of previous refractive surgery.
  • Corneal irregularities potentially affecting visual acuity: keratoconus, corneal dystrophy, corneal opacities.
  • Participation in (or current participation) any investigational drug or device trial within the previous 30 days prior to the start date of this trial.
  • Intraocular conventional surgery within the past three months or intraocular laser surgery within one month in the operated eye.
  • Use of any systemic or topical drug known to interfere with visual performance.
  • Pregnant or nursing mothers and females of childbearing potential not practicing a reliable and medically acceptable method of birth control
  • Inability or unwillingness of subjects to give written informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kerry Solomon, MD, Medical University of South Carolina

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

August 21, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2006

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MRC-06-003

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ

Clinical Trials on LASIK surgery

3
Subscribe