Osseous Setting Improvement With Co-implantation of Osseous Matrix and Mesenchymal Progenitors Cells From Autologous Bone Marrow

September 22, 2009 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Sometime osseous reconstruction needs allogeneic bone, in this study we use Ostéopure™ from Ostéobanque d'Auvergne, which is a osseous matrix. However Ostéopure™ integration lasts a long time. To optimize this integration we purpose to associate mesenchymal progenitors cells from autologous bone marrow.

Study Overview

Status

Suspended

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

All patients will be treated for tibia or femur pseudo-arthrosis. At the beginning of chirurgical intervention, autologous bone marrow will be sampling and will be concentrated during this one.

Meanwhile osseous matrix (Ostéopure™ ) will be incubated in autologous blood serum and finally implanted in the fracture site. And after (at the end of chirurgical intervention), concentrate autologous bone marrow will be injected in the same place.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • tibia or femur pseudo-arthrosis,
  • patient who needs bone graft

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - contra indications for chirurgical intervention or bone graft

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Evaluate osseous setting at 3-months follow-up and compare our results with past studies
Time Frame: at 3-months follow-up
at 3-months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Feasibility and tolerance of this therapeutic strategy
Time Frame: at 3-months follow-up
at 3-months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marc Berger, Dr

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2011

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

November 14, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 23, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2009

Last Verified

September 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tibia or Femur Pseudo-arthrosis

Clinical Trials on Chirurgical procedure

3
Subscribe