Comparison of Ondansetron, Metoclopramide and Promethazine for the Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting in the Adult ED

September 30, 2013 updated by: Tyler Barrett, Vanderbilt University

A Randomized, Double Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Trial Comparing Ondansetron, Metoclopramide and Promethazine for the Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting in the Adult Emergency Department.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of ondansetron, metoclopramide, and promethazine for the treatment of nausea in the adult emergency department population.

We hypothesize that a single intravenous dose of ondansetron is more effective in reducing nausea than a single IV dose of metoclopramide, promethazine or normal saline placebo in undifferentiated adult emergency department patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

171

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37240
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients age 18 or older who present to the ED with a complaint requiring antiemetic treatment who do not meet the exclusion criteria.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients less than 18 years of age
  • Unstable patients with SBP < 90
  • Patients with a stated or documented allergy to any of the study medications
  • Patients whose nausea rating if < 40 on the pretreatment VAS scale
  • Patients who have received a commonly accepted antiemetic within the previous 24 hours
  • Patients unwilling or unable to complete the assessment tool before and 30 minutes after study drug dosing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Ondansetron
Ondansetron 4 mg intravenous administration
4 mg intravenous dose administered over 2 minutes through a peripheral intravenous catheter
Active Comparator: Metoclopramide
Metoclopramide 10 mg intravenous administration
10 mg intravenous dose administered over 2 minutes through a peripheral intravenous catheter
Active Comparator: Promethazine
Promethazine 10 mg intravenous administration
12.5 mg intravenous dose administered over 2 minutes through a peripheral intravenous catheter
Placebo Comparator: Saline Placebo
Volume-matched saline placebo
Volume matched isotonic sodium chloride solution dose administered over 2 minutes through a peripheral intravenous catheter

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score for Nausea. This Was Calculated by Subtracting the Patient's Reported Score on the 30 Minute VAS From the Patient's Reported VAS Score on Their Baseline VAS.
Time Frame: Baseline and 30 minute assessments
Participants independently rated their nausea severity on separate scales at the baseline and 30-minute evaluations to prevent the baseline VAS score from influencing the 30-minute mark. The VAS had the words "Least Severe" on the left and "Most Severe" on the right. The possible values range from 0 to 100mm with 0 at the "Least Severe" extreme and 100 at the "Most Severe" extreme. Investigators instructed the participant to draw a single vertical line through the point on the 100mm scale that corresponded to their nausea severity at the times of measurement (Baseline and 30 minutes).
Baseline and 30 minute assessments

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tyler W Barrett, MD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

April 10, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 30, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2013

Last Verified

September 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nausea

Clinical Trials on Ondansetron

3
Subscribe