A Randomized Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Prograf vs Prograf-XL in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

December 16, 2015 updated by: Astellas Pharma Inc

A Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Prograf (Tacrolimus)/MMF and Extended Release (XL) Tacrolimus /MMF in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Prograf extended release(XL) plus MMF with Prograf plus MMF in de novo kidney transplant recipients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

73

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taichung, Taiwan, 407
      • Tainan, Taiwan, 704
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 112
      • Taoyuan, Taiwan, 333

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has been fully informed and has signed an IRB approved informed consent form and is willing and able to follow study procedures
  • Patient is a recipient of a primary or retransplanted cadaveric or non-HLA-identical living kidney transplant
  • Patient must receive first oral dose of randomized study drug within 48 hours of transplant procedure
  • Female patients of child bearing potential must have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test within 7 days prior to enrollment or upon hospitalization

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has previously received or is receiving an organ transplant other than a kidney
  • Patient has received a kidney transplant from a non-heart beating donor
  • Patient has received an ABO incompatible donor kidney
  • Recipient or donor is known to be seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • Patient has a current malignancy or a history of malignancy (within the past 5 years), except non-metastatic basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been treated successfully
  • Patient has significant liver disease, defined as having during the past 28 days continuously elevated AST (SGOT) and/or ALT (SGPT) levels greater than 3 times the upper value of the normal range of the investigational site
  • Patient has an uncontrolled concomitant infection or any other unstable medical condition that could interfere with the study objectives
  • Patient is currently taking or has been taking an investigational drug in the 30 days prior to transplant
  • Patient is receiving everolimus or enteric coated mycophenolic acid at any time during the study
  • Patient has a known hypersensitivity to tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil or corticosteroids
  • Patient is pregnant or lactating
  • Patient is unlikely to comply with the visits scheduled in the protocol
  • Patient has any form of substance abuse, psychiatric disorder or a condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may invalidate communication with the investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Prograf-XL + MMF
oral
Other Names:
  • tacrolimus extended release
  • MR4
  • FK506XL
oral
Other Names:
  • Mycophenolate Mofetil
Active Comparator: Prograf + MMF
oral
Other Names:
  • Mycophenolate Mofetil
oral
Other Names:
  • FK506
  • tacrolimus

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The patient and graft survival rates at 6 month post-transplant
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Efficacy failure at 6-month posttransplant.
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Incidence of biopsy confirmed acute rejection (Banff > 1) at 6 months and 12 months
Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months
6 months and 12 months
1 year patient and graft survival
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

July 17, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 17, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Kidney Transplantation

Clinical Trials on Prograf-XL

3
Subscribe