Evaluation of a Mechanical Device During Acute Respiratory Failure in Patients With Neuromuscular Disorders (Nemucough)

Evaluation of a Mechanical Insufflation-exsufflation Device During Acute Respiratory Failure in Patients With Neuromuscular Disorders: a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study

The hypothesis is that a mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) is associated with a decrease in the number of intubations and more rapid clinical improvement in children and adults with neuromuscular disease who are admitted for an acute respiratory exacerbation.In this prospective, randomised, multicenter study, 55 patients will be treated with standard treatment and a MI-E, and 55 patients with standard treatment and standard respiratory physiotherapy. The primary objective is the reduction of the number of patients requiring invasive ventilatory support (endotracheal intubation or tracheotomy) in the group treated with MI-E (MI-E group). The main secondary objectives are a reduction in hospital stay and an improvement in clinical condition, dyspnea and respiratory muscle function.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Justification Respiratory muscle weakness reduces the efficacy of the cough reflex in patients with neuromuscular disorders and exposes them to the risk of acute respiratory failure. Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation devices assist cough and have been shown to be efficient in increasing the cough expiratory flow in children and adults with neuromuscular disease and decreasing the risk of intubation in a limited population of hospitalized adults with acute respiratory failure.

Primary objective The goal is to record the efficacy of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) during acute respiratory failure in patients with neuromuscular disorders.The primary objective is the reduction of the number of patients requiring invasive ventilatory support (endotracheal intubation or tracheotomy) in the group treated with MI-E (MI-E group) compared to the group treated with traditional chest physiotherapy without MI-E (Control group).

Secondary objectives

In the MI-E group, compared to the Control group:

  1. Decrease in the length of hospitalization in the intensive care unit (ICU)
  2. Decrease in the total length of hospitalization
  3. Decrease in the incidence of bronchoscopy-assisted aspiration
  4. Decrease in the duration of oxygen therapy
  5. Decrease in the daily length of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV)
  6. Improvement in blood gases on room air during hospitalization
  7. Improvement of the peak cough flow (PCF)
  8. Improvement of the vital capacity (VC), maximal inspiratory (PImax) and expiratory (PEmax) pressures, sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP), peak expiratory flow (PEF) and dyspnea during hospitalization.
  9. Decrease in the number of secondary tracheotomies (for weaning of ventilatory support)

Type of study Prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study

Number of subjects The calculation of the number of subjects is based on two retrospective studies. In the study by VIANELLO, which included 11 adults hospitalized in the ICU for respiratory failure, the number of therapeutic failures, defined as the need for a "mini" tracheotomy or intubation, was significantly less in the group using MI-E than in a group of 16 historical control patients [2 failures in the MI-E group (18%) versus 10 failures in the control group (63%), p<0.05] (1). Another study reported 19 successes (80%) versus 5 failures on MI-E (2).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75012
        • Hospital Armand Trousseau, Pediatric Pulmonology Department and INSERM UMR S-893

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Pediatric or adult patients with chronic neuromuscular disorders, such as spinal muscular atrophy, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, other congenital myopathy, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), hospitalized for acute respiratory failure, as defined by:

  • Persistent bronchial encumbrance (> 2 days) despite regular treatment in the homecare setting, associated with-Oxygen desaturation on room air, defined by a pulse oximetry (SaO2) <95%) or
  • In patients not receiving long-term NPPV: the need to institute NPPV-In patients receiving long-term NPPV: the need to increase the daily length of NPPV by at least 25%.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Need for immediate intubation (alteration in consciousness, coma, hemodynamic disorders)
  • Multiple organ failure (e.g., associated cardiac failure)
  • In adults: respiratory rate >30/min, pH < 7.35, PaCO2 > 50 mm Hg
  • Facial deformity or anomaly which prevents the use of a mouthpiece or mask
  • Patients who signed a refusal to be intubated regardless of the progression of their disease
  • Patients on long-term oxygen therapy
  • Tracheotomized patients
  • Patients requiring the use of an intrapulmonary percussive ventilation device during hospitalization
  • Acute neuromuscular disorder of known or unknown etiology
  • Associated lung disease such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • Refusal of patient consent and/or parental consent in the case of a minor
  • Uncooperative patients
  • Patients < 4 years old

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
patients treated with standard treatment and a mechanical insufflation-exsufflation
Patients will receive MI-E treatment with the following settings: insufflation pressure of at least +30 cm H2O and an exsufflation pressure ≥ -30 cm H2O. There will be at least 6 hyperinflation/exsufflation sequences per session of chest physiotherapy. There will be at least two daily sessions done routinely by the respiratory therapist at 8 hour intervals.
Other Names:
  • Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation devices assist cough
Active Comparator: 2
Patients with standard treatment and standard respiratory physiotherapy
Traditional chest physiotherapy without mechanical insufflation-exsufflation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Reduction of the number of patients requiring invasive ventilatory support in the group treated with MI-E (MI-E group) compared to the group treated with traditional chest physiotherapy without MI-E (Control group).
Time Frame: During the treatment phase
During the treatment phase

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Decrease in the length of hospitalization in the intensive care unit (ICU) (if necessary)
Time Frame: During the treatment phase
During the treatment phase
Decrease in the total length of hospitalization
Time Frame: During the treatment phase
During the treatment phase
Decrease in the incidence of bronchoscopy-assisted aspiration
Time Frame: During the treatment phase
During the treatment phase
Decrease in the duration of oxygen therapy
Time Frame: During the treatment phase
During the treatment phase
Decrease in the daily length of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV)
Time Frame: During the treatment phase
During the treatment phase
Improvement in blood gases on room air during hospitalization and improvement of the peak cough flow (PCF)
Time Frame: During the treatment phase
During the treatment phase
Improvement of the vital capacity (VC), maximal inspiratory (PImax) and expiratory (PEmax) pressures, sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP), peak expiratory flow (PEF) and dyspnea during hospitalization
Time Frame: During the treatment phase
During the treatment phase
Decrease in the number of secondary tracheotomies (for weaning of ventilatory support)
Time Frame: During the treatment phase
During the treatment phase

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brigitte FAUROUX, MD PhD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

February 9, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 28, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuromuscular Diseases

Clinical Trials on mechanical insufflation - exsufflation

3
Subscribe