Improving Psychological Wellness After Acquired Brain Injury

September 9, 2010 updated by: Toronto Rehabilitation Institute

Improving Mood, Adjustment and Coping in People With Acquired Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Examine the Efficacy of a Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Protocol Adapted for Brain Injury and Remote Administration of Services.

The purpose of the study is to investigate the potential benefits of a psychological therapy, called cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT), for improving emotional well being after acquired brain injury and to demonstrate its efficacy in both under telephone (T-CBT) and face-to-face group (G-CBT) modes of delivery compared to an educational control group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Each year, approximately 50,000 Canadians sustain an acquired brain injury (ABI) with 16,000 of those individuals living in Ontario. Individuals with ABI not only suffer significant cognitive and motor impairments, but they often experience debilitating emotional distress. Emotional distress uniquely contributes to poorer functional outcomes and decreased quality of life. Moreover, emotional distress confers risk for the subsequent development of serious mental illness such as depression, anxiety disorders, suicide and possibly psychotic illness. While a great deal of clinical resources are devoted to the cognitive and motor sequelae of ABI, the concomitant psychological and psychiatric sequelae of brain injury often receive relatively little attention in in-patient and day-hospital programs, and the expense and inaccessibility of therapeutic services are often prohibitive for consumers in the sub-acute and chronic stages of brain injury. Moreover, few psychological interventions are tailored to the specific cognitive needs and content issues of brain-injured consumers. We have taken a well-validated mode of psychological treatment used in face-to-face therapeutic settings - Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) - and adapted it for the needs of brain-injured clients. Thus far, the protocol has been adapted for content issues and cognitive impairments of people with ABI, it has been adapted for telehealth delivery, it has been through expert review, and its feasibility has been assessed. The aim of the proposed research is to demonstrate in a randomized control trial (RCT) the efficacy of the adapted protocol, both in a standard delivery modality (i.e., face to face and group) and in the telehealth delivery modality in comparison to an education control group. The treatment is focused on improving coping skills and decreasing psychological distress post-ABI. If proven effective, the intervention could be used cost-effectively by a range of therapists (e.g., Psychologists; Psychiatrists; Occupational Therapists and Social Workers) to improve coping, adjustment and quality of life for ABI consumers irrespective of geographical location, mobility restrictions or economic status.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L4Z 3G1
        • Recruiting
        • Peel Halton Acquired Brain Injury Service
        • Contact:
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2A2
        • Recruiting
        • Toronto Rehabilitation Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • One standard deviation above the mean on the SCL-90-R, Global Severity Index (GSI)
  • Moderate to severe brain injury, operationalized as a GCS of 12 or less in TBI participants and cognitive impairment of at least two standard deviations below expected levels in at least one cognitive domain in all participants
  • on a stable dosage and being monitored by a physician(if on psychoactive medications)
  • able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Endorsement of significant suicidal ideation at the time of evaluation
  • Engaged in another CBT or other psychotherapeutic intervention
  • Communication disorder that would preclude participation in the intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
Cognitive behavioural therapy to be delivered in a group setting for 11 sessions, for 1 to 1.5 hours/session.
Cognitive behavioural therapy to be delivered in one-on-one via the telephone across 11 sessions, for 1 to 1.5 hours/session.
Experimental: Telephone Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
Cognitive behavioural therapy to be delivered in a group setting for 11 sessions, for 1 to 1.5 hours/session.
Cognitive behavioural therapy to be delivered in one-on-one via the telephone across 11 sessions, for 1 to 1.5 hours/session.
No Intervention: Group Education
No Intervention: Telephone Education

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Greater reduction in distress as determined by improved scores on the Global Severity Index of the Symptom Checklist 90-R.
Time Frame: 1 month and 6 months post treatment
1 month and 6 months post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Reduction in psychological distress and improvement in coping as determined by improved scores on the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, Community Integration Scale, and the Satisfaction with Life questionnaire.
Time Frame: 1 month and 6 months post-treatment
1 month and 6 months post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robin E Green, Ph.D., C.Psych, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute
  • Study Chair: Cheryl Bradbury, Psy. D., C. Psych, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

March 20, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 10, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2010

Last Verified

September 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Behavioural Therapy

3
Subscribe