- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00929240
A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) + Xeloda (Capecitabine)as Maintenance Therapy in Patients With HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
March 2, 2015 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche
A Randomized Study of the Effect of Maintenance Therapy With Bevacizumab + Capecitabine Versus Bevacizumab Alone on Progression-free Survival in Patients With HER2-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer That Has Not Progressed During First-line Docetaxel Plus Bevacizumab Therapy
This randomized study will compare maintenance therapy with Avastin (bevacizumab) + Xeloda (capecitabine) versus Avastin alone, in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer who have not progressed during first-line therapy with docetaxel + Avastin.
Eligible patients will receive up to 6 x 3 week cycles of treatment with Avastin (15 mg/mg IV on Day 1 of each cycle) + docetaxel (75-100 mg/m2 IV on Day 1 of each cycle).
Those patients who do not progress will be randomized to 3 week cycles of either a) Avastin (15 mg/kg IV on Day 1 of each cycle) + Xeloda (1000 mg/m2 po bid on Days 1-14 of each cycle) or b) Avastin alone.
Study treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient request for withdrawal or end of study, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
287
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
CE
-
Fortaleza, CE, Brazil, 60336-550
-
-
MG
-
Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, 30190-130
-
-
RJ
-
Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 20560-120
-
-
RS
-
Ijui, RS, Brazil, 98700-000
-
Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 90035-003
-
-
SP
-
Jau, SP, Brazil, 17210-080
-
Santo Andre, SP, Brazil, 09060-650
-
Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 01246-000
-
Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 08270-070
-
-
-
-
-
Beijing, China, 100021
-
Beijing, China, 100071
-
Beijing, China, 100853
-
Hangzhou, China, 310022
-
Hangzhou, China, 310009
-
Shanghai, China, 200032
-
-
-
-
-
Alexandria, Egypt, 11737
-
Cairo, Egypt, 11796
-
-
-
-
-
Amiens, France, 80090
-
Angers, France, 49933
-
Besancon, France, 25030
-
Bobigny, France, 93009
-
Dijon, France, 21079
-
Hyeres, France, 83400
-
Le Coudray, France, 28630
-
Lille, France, 59000
-
Paris, France, 75970
-
Paris, France, 75231
-
Perigueux, France, 24000
-
Rodez, France, 12027
-
St Priest En Jarez, France, 42271
-
Strasbourg, France, 67010
-
-
-
-
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 852
-
-
-
-
-
Bangalore, India, 560027
-
Hyderabad, India, 500034
-
Mumbai, India, 400012
-
Mumbai, India, 400020
-
New Delhi, India, 110 060
-
New Delhi, India, 110085
-
-
-
-
Campania
-
Napoli, Campania, Italy, 80131
-
-
Friuli-Venezia Giulia
-
Trieste, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy, 34100
-
-
Liguria
-
Genova, Liguria, Italy, 16132
-
-
Lombardia
-
Saronno, Lombardia, Italy, 21047
-
-
Puglia
-
Brindisi, Puglia, Italy, 72100
-
-
Toscana
-
Antella (FI), Toscana, Italy, 50011
-
-
-
-
-
Bydgoszcz, Poland, 85-796
-
Wroclaw, Poland, 53-413
-
-
-
-
-
Dammam, Saudi Arabia, 31444
-
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 21497
-
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 21589
-
-
-
-
-
Jaen, Spain, 23007
-
Malaga, Spain, 29010
-
Toledo, Spain, 45004
-
Valencia, Spain, 46026
-
-
Alicante
-
Alcoy, Alicante, Spain, 03804
-
-
Barcelona
-
Sabadell, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 08208
-
-
Ciudad Real
-
Alcazar de S. Juan, Ciudad Real, Spain, 13600
-
-
Vizcaya
-
Barakaldo, Vizcaya, Spain, 48903
-
-
-
-
-
Ankara, Turkey, 06500
-
Ankara, Turkey, 06800
-
Antalya, Turkey, 07070
-
Istanbul, Turkey, 34000
-
Sıhhiye, ANKARA, Turkey, 06100
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- adult patients, >=18 years of age;
- HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer
- candidates for taxane-based chemotherapy;
- ECOG performance status of 0 or 1.
Exclusion Criteria:
- previous chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer;
- prior adjuvant/neo-adjuvant chemotherapy within 6 months prior to study;
- prior radiotherapy for treatment of metastatic disease;
- chronic daily treatment with aspirin (325 mg/day) or clopidogrel(>75mg/day).
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Avastin (bevacizumab)
|
15 mg/kg iv on day 1 of each 3 week cycle (maintenance phase)
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Avastin (bevacizumab) + Xeloda (capecitabine)
|
15 mg/kg iv on day 1 of each 3 week cycle (maintenance phase)
1000 mg/m2 po bid on days 1-14 of each 3 week cycle (maintenance phase)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)
Time Frame: Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 years
|
Progression Free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from first study drug dosing (during the maintenance treatment phase) to the first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first.
Progression was based on tumor assessment made by the investigators according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST).
Progressive Disease (PD) was defined as a 20 percent (%) or greater increase in the sum of the Longest Diameter (LD) of the target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded or appearance of new lesions.
|
Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 years
|
Progression Free Survival (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)
Time Frame: Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 years
|
PFS was defined as the time from first study drug dosing to the first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first.Time to progression was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression defined per RECIST 1.0 criteria.
Participants without an event at data cut-off or who were withdrawn from the study without documented progression were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment when the participant was known to be progression free.
Participants who took other non-protocol anti-cancer drugs while being on study medication, and who were still event free were censored on the date of first dose of the anti-cancer drug.
Participants without post-randomization tumor assessments but alive were censored at the time of randomization.
Participants without post-randomization assessments, who died after randomization were considered to have the PFS event at date of death.
Kaplan-Meier estimation was used for median time to PFS
|
Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Confirmed Objective Response of CR or PR Per RECIST 1.0 (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)
Time Frame: Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 years
|
Objective Response was determined by the investigator using modified RECIST criteria, Version 1.0.
An objective response was a complete or partial overall confirmed response as determined by investigators.
CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions.
PR was defined as greater than or equal to (≥) 30 % decrease in the sum of appropriate diameters of all target measurable lesions, no progress in the non-measurable disease, and no new lesions.
Progressive disease (PD) was defined as 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions and SD was defined as small changes that do not meet above criteria.
Pearson-Clopper one-sample method was used for Confidence intervals (CIs).
|
Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 years
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (CR, PR and SD) Per RECIST 1.0 (Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)
Time Frame: Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 years
|
CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions.
PR was defined as ≥ 30 % decrease in the sum of appropriate diameters of all target measurable lesions, no progress in the non-measurable disease, and no new lesions.
SD was defined as small changes that do not meet above criteria.
|
Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 years
|
Percentage of Participants Who Died (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)
Time Frame: Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 years
|
Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 years
|
|
Overall Survival (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)
Time Frame: Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 years
|
Duration of Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to death of any cause.
The OS data for participants for whom no death was captured in the clinical database were censored at the last time they were known to be alive.
Kaplan Meier estimation was used to determine OS.
|
Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 years
|
Percentage of Participants Expected to Be Alive After 1 and 2 Years on Treatment (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)
Time Frame: Years 1 and 2
|
Probability of being alive after 1 and 2 years on treatment with 95% CIs was calculated using Kaplan Meier approach with LOGLOG transformation.
|
Years 1 and 2
|
Percentage Of Participants With PD or Death Due to PD (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)
Time Frame: Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013
|
PD was defined per RECIST 1.0 as 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.
|
Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013
|
Time To Progression (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)
Time Frame: Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013
|
Time to Progression was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression (using investigator assessments of disease progression by RECIST 1.0).
PD was defined as 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.
|
Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013
|
Quality of Life Assessed As Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Using The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - 30 (EORTC QLQ - C30) (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)
Time Frame: Baseline, Randomization and Cycles 3, 6, 9 and 12
|
The EORTC QLQ-C30 incorporates 9 multi-item scales: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); 9 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties); and a global health and quality-of-life scale.
Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent').
Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms.
The change in global health status was determined to be the difference in values at baseline and each specific visit.
The term ''baseline'' refers to the time of randomization to the maintenance phase.
|
Baseline, Randomization and Cycles 3, 6, 9 and 12
|
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Confirmed Objective Response of CR or PR Per RECIST 1.0 (Initial Treatment Phase)
Time Frame: Screening and at the end of every third cycle until randomization for an average of 18 weeks
|
Objective Response was determined by the investigator using RECIST criteria, Version 1.0.
An objective response was a complete or partial overall confirmed response as determined by investigators.
CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions.
PR was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of appropriate diameters of all target measurable lesions, no progress in the non-measurable disease, and no new lesions.
Pearson-Clopper one-sample method was used for CI.
|
Screening and at the end of every third cycle until randomization for an average of 18 weeks
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (CR, PR and SD) Per RECIST 1.0 (Initial Treatment Phase)
Time Frame: Screening and at the end of every third cycle until randomization for an average of 18 weeks
|
CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions.
PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in the sum of appropriate diameters of all target measurable lesions, no progress in the non-measurable disease, and no new lesions.
SD was defined as small changes that do not meet above criteria.
|
Screening and at the end of every third cycle until randomization for an average of 18 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
July 1, 2009
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
June 1, 2014
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
June 1, 2014
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2009
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 25, 2009
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
June 26, 2009
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
March 3, 2015
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 2, 2015
Last Verified
March 1, 2015
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Skin Diseases
- Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Breast Diseases
- Breast Neoplasms
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
- Antimetabolites
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
- Angiogenesis Inhibitors
- Angiogenesis Modulating Agents
- Growth Substances
- Growth Inhibitors
- Capecitabine
- Bevacizumab
Other Study ID Numbers
- MO22223
- 2008-006872-31
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer
-
Northwestern UniversityEisai Inc.UnknownMale Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Triple-negative Breast Cancer | Stage IA Breast Cancer | Stage IB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | HER2-negative...United States
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New JerseyActive, not recruitingStage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Triple-negative Breast Cancer | Stage IIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | HER2-negative Breast CancerUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedMale Breast Cancer | Stage IV Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IA Breast Cancer | Stage IB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Recurrent Breast CancerUnited States
-
University of WashingtonTerminatedBreast Cancer | Breast Cancer Stage I | Breast Cancer Stage II | Breast Cancer Stage III | Breast Cancer Stage IIB | Breast Cancer Stage IIA | Breast Cancer Stage IIIA | Breast Cancer Stage IIIB | Breast Cancer Stage IIIcUnited States
-
CelgeneCompletedBreast Cancer | Metastatic Breast Cancer | Stage IV Breast Cancer | Triple-negative Breast Cancer | Recurrent Breast Cancer | Breast Tumor | Cancer of the Breast | Triple-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor- Negative Breast Cancer | HER2- Negative Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor- Negative...United States, United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, Spain, Canada, Portugal, Australia, Austria, Greece, Brazil, France
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedHER2-positive Breast Cancer | Stage IV Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IA Breast Cancer | Stage IB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Recurrent Breast CancerUnited States
-
University of WashingtonNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedHER2-positive Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IA Breast Cancer | Stage IB Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-positive Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-positive Breast...United States
-
University of WashingtonNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedHER2-positive Breast Cancer | Male Breast Cancer | Stage IV Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Recurrent Breast CancerUnited States
-
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson...Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer FoundationCompletedStage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Triple-negative Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | HER2-negative Breast CancerUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnStage IV Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Triple-negative Breast Cancer | Stage IA Breast Cancer | Stage IB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Recurrent Breast Cancer
Clinical Trials on bevacizumab [Avastin]
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedGlioblastoma MultiformeSwitzerland, France, United Kingdom, Denmark
-
Innovent Biologics (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.Completed
-
Northwell HealthFeinstein Institute for Medical Research; Hofstra North ShoreSuspendedVestibular SchwannomaUnited States
-
Ronald HoffmanNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Myeloproliferative Disorders-Research ConsortiumTerminated
-
Children's Hospital Los AngelesTemporarily not availableRetinopathy of PrematurityUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaCompletedDiabetic Retinopathy | Retinal DetachmentUnited States
-
mAbxience Research S.L.CompletedHealthy VolunteersUnited Kingdom
-
Universidad Autonoma de San Luis PotosíUnknownRetinopathy of PrematurityMexico
-
CelltrionCompleted
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompletedRecurrent Respiratory PapillomatosisUnited States