Trial of exSALT SD7™ Compared to Xeroform® Petrolatum Dressing for the Management of Partial Thickness Donor Sites

December 22, 2009 updated by: Exciton Technologies Inc.

A Randomized, Site-Matched, Controlled Trial of exSALT SD7™ Compared to Xeroform® Petrolatum Dressing for the Management of Partial Thickness Donor Sites

This randomized, controlled trial is designed to evaluate split-thickness donor sites treated with exSALT SD7™ compared to donor sites treated with Xeroform®. For the purpose of this study, subjects enrolled will have selected donor sites or portions of donor sites designated as "Test Sites." The selected locations will be randomly assigned treatment with either the Test Dressing or the Control Dressing.

The primary objective of the trial will be to quantify the proportion of the donor sites in each group that are healed at 10 and 14 days. Secondary objectives will include: time to re-epithelialization, pain with dressing changes and mobilization, ease of use, resource utilization and safety, as well as quality of healing and overall cosmetic result. A total of 25 subjects will be enrolled in the trial.

The trial duration will be 12 weeks. For the purposes of this trial, healing will be defined as ≥ 90% re-epithelialization and must be visually confirmed by the investigator or designate and two other people (i.e., research nurse, burn resident, member of the Wound Care Team). The maximum time to evaluate healing will be 14 days +/-2 days. A final visit will be conducted at 12 weeks for safety and to evaluate the quality of healing.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Autologous skin grafting is a common procedure required in the care of burn and plastic surgery patients where the harvesting of autologous skin grafts results in the creation of a partial thickness wound known as a donor site. The donor site healing time can affect the length of hospitalization and subject survival.

The literature reports the use of a variety of donor site dressing materials including fine mesh gauze, polyurethane film, synthetic fiber and hydrocolloids (Kilinc, Sensoz et al. 2001). The literature reports what might be considered the optimal donor site dressing attributes. These attributes would include: minimizing pain, velocity in healing, minimizing bacterial growth and simplicity in use (Rakel, Bermel et al. 1998).

However, none of the available dressing products are entirely satisfactory. Fine mesh gauze (FMG) is the donor site dressing used at many burn centers, as it is inexpensive, can be placed on posterior donor sites, does not require a margin of intact skin and allows large amounts of exudate to drain away from the donor site.

However, FMG does not have any inherent anti-infective properties and provides a dry environment for wound healing. Xeroform® Petrolatum Dressing resembles FMG physically except that it contains 3% xeroform (bismuth tribromophenate) which exerts some antibacterial effect (Feldman, Rogers et al. 1991). Xeroform® Petrolatum Dressing is the standard donor site dressing in the Firefighters' Burn Treatment Unit (3C2 WMC) and Plastic Surgery Unit (3D3 WMC) and has been selected as the control treatment (Control Dressing).

Research evidence demonstrates that partial thickness wounds re-epithelialize more rapidly in a moist environment that is free from infection (Alper 1986; Alvarez 1988). In an effort to provide an improved method of dressing wounds and donor sites, exSALT SD7™ has been proposed as an alternative dressing (Test Dressing). The dressing is intended to reduce pain and discomfort and improve the re-epithelialization process by providing a moist environment. The model outlined in this protocol provides the basis for a controlled comparison of wound healing and re-epithelialization in a clean partial thickness wound that allows us to compare the healing rate and quality of the Test Dressing compared to our standard of care to determine safety and efficacy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2B7
        • Recruiting
        • The University of Alberta Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Edward E Tredget, MD, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Timothy M Riegel, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • signed or verbal informed consent provided
  • are 18 to 65 years of age
  • scheduled to undergo a split-thickness skin graft (autograft) that will result in a donor site or sites that are; a first time harvest and includes primarily the anterior including medial and lateral aspects of the anterior portion(s) of the thigh(s) with either; a single donor site that is a minimum of 8 x 20 cm or two donor sites are both a minimum of 8 x 8 cm and the resulting test sites are generally comparable in size and wound characteristics.
  • requires hospitalization for initial treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • require full thickness graft
  • known skin sensitivity to any of the dressing components
  • poor prognosis and who are unlikely to survive the trial period
  • participating in another concurrent trial
  • exhibiting any other medical condition, which, according to the investigator, justifies the subject's exclusion from the trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: exSALT SD7™ Wound Dressing
The exSALT™ SD7 Wound Dressing provides an antimicrobial barrier that inhibits microbial growth in the dressing. The exSALT™ SD7 Wound Dressing consists of 3 layers: two non-adherent polyethylene mesh wound contact layers and one absorbent core made of polyester. All three layers are silver coated. The concentration of silver on the exSALT™ SD7 Wound Dressing is approximately 0.4 mg/cm2 (2.5% w/w).
The exSALT™ SD7 Wound Dressing is indicated for the management of partial and full thickness wounds, including decubitus ulcers, venous stasis ulcers, diabetic ulcers, first and second degree burns, grafts and donor sites, or other acute or chronic wounds. The dressing may be used over debrided and grafted wounds.
Other Names:
  • K083870
Active Comparator: Xeroform® Petrolatum Dressing
Xeroform® Petrolatum Dressing (Xeroform® / Control Dressing) is fine mesh gauze impregnated with 3% Bismuth Tribromophenate in a special petrolatum blend. The dressing is a non adherent dressing that clings and conforms to all body parts.
Sterile, single use, non-adherent dressing consisting of absorbent gauze impregnated with Xeroform in a petrolatum blend.
Other Names:
  • K973507

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Evaluate the proportion of donor sites healed.
Time Frame: 10 days
10 days
Evaluate the proportion of donor sites healed.
Time Frame: 14 Days
14 Days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time to re-epithelialization.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Pain with dressing changes and mobilization.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Assessments that quantify ease of use.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Resource utilization and safety.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Appearance and long term cosmetic results.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ruth Collins-Nakai, MD, MBA, Exciton Technologies Inc.
  • Principal Investigator: Edward E Tredget, MD, MSc, University of Alberta

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2010

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

August 31, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 24, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2009

Last Verified

December 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PR-0004

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wound Infection

Clinical Trials on The exSALT™ SD7 Wound Dressing

3
Subscribe