Incidence and Relationship of Positive Preoperative Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Screens and Post-operative Infections (MRSA)

June 3, 2021 updated by: Cynthia Hack, Inova Health Care Services

Evaluation of the Prevalence of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Colonization in Pre-Surgical Patients and Post-Operative Infection

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of pre-surgical patients who are MRSA carriers. From an evidence-based practice perspective, findings from this study can be considered in the evaluation of the hospital SOP mandating pre-surgical MRSA screening requirements for patients with scheduled surgeries.

The central hypothesis to be addressed in this study is whether the MRSA colonization and subsequent post-operative infection are the equivalent in these populations.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Design and Methods: Subjects in this study of 975 pre-operative, scheduled surgical patients are in one of the three following groups:

  • Group 1 (N=325): Allocation sample of surgical patients required to be MRSA screened per hospital SOP (including patients having a positive MRSA history, orthopedic surgery, undergoing dialysis, or transfer from another hospital, nursing home, skilled nursing facility, or jail).
  • Group 2 (N=650): Randomized sample (1:1 ratio) of surgical patients not required to be MRSA screened per hospital SOP, to one of the following two groups:

    • 2a (N=325): MRSA screening; or
    • 2b (N=325): No MRSA screening. All subjects were followed for 30 days post-operatively to determine the incidence of post-operative infection. Treatment, diagnostic, and hospitalization data were collected for patients diagnosed with post-operative infection.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

975

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Falls Church, Virginia, United States, 22042
        • Inova Health Care Services
      • Leesburg, Virginia, United States, 20176
        • Inova Loudoun Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Pre-surgical out patient at ILH
  2. Surgical procedure scheduled at least 2 days before surgery
  3. Surgery being done at ILH operating room
  4. Provision of signed ICF

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient 18 years of age or older who is deemed by the hospital incapable of providing Informed Consent
  2. Inability to communicate in the English language

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: No MRSA screening, Group b
Standard of care
Other: MRSA screening, Group a
MRSA preoperative screening
MRSA preoperative screening and post operative infection rate, 30 days post operative

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary objective of this study is to compare the prevalence of MRSA colonization and its relationship to post-operative infection in patients who are currently pre-operatively MRSA screened per SOP to those who are not.
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The secondary objective is to compare medical charges associated with diagnosis and treatment of post-operative infections for these groups using cost-effectiveness analysis.
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Karen G Speroni, BSN, MHSA, PhD, Inova Loudoun Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

December 9, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infection

Clinical Trials on Preoperative MRSA screening

3
Subscribe