A Pilot Trial of Interferon Beta-1a in Alzheimer's Disease (REAL)

January 20, 2014 updated by: Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Pilot Trial of Interferon Beta-1a in Alzheimer's Disease

This was a 52-week, multicentric, phase II, pilot study conducted in 40 subjects with early-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) to evaluate safety, tolerability and clinical efficacy of subcutaneous (sc) interferon (IFN) beta-1a [Rebif® 22 microgram (mcg), three times per week (tiw)] in the treatment of AD by comparing the neuropsychological performance changes into placebo and treatment arms from screening/baseline to 52 week.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Alzheimer's disease is characterized by progressive cognitive impairment resulting from neuronal loss. The primary pathological feature of the disease is the extracellular deposition of fibrillary amyloid and its compaction into senile plaques. The senile plaque is the focus of a complex cellular reaction involving the activation of both microglia and astrocytes adjacent to the amyloid plaque. In fact, microglias are the most abundant and prominent cellular components associated with these plaques. Plaque-associated microglia exhibits a reactive or activated phenotype. Through the acquisition of a reactive phenotype, microglia responds to various stimuli, as is evident by the increased expression of numerous cell-surface molecules, including major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class-II antigens and complement receptors.

Traditionally, multiple sclerosis (MS) has been considered a "demyelinating" disease. Recent immunocytochemical studies suggest that MS may be more than a demyelinating disorder, and that even in early stages of the disease, MS pathological scenario envisages axonal damage. Interferons, the modern therapeutic strategies for the treatment of MS, are cytokines - proteins which lead to a network of signals within different cells. In the immune system, IFNs act at different levels. For example, IFNs increase the expression of MHC class II antigens and, thereby, facilitate the antigen-presenting process and the activation of lymphocytes. T-lymphocytes are important targets of IFN immunomodulation. In MS, it is believed that IFN beta suppresses the production of proinflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ and TNF-α, and increases the production of immunosuppressive cytokines such as interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-10. Since the activation of microglia and astrocytes is common to both AD and MS, IFN beta could have therapeutic applications in the treatment of AD. Furthermore, recent studies have also found that through astrocyte production, IFNs promote the activation of nerve-growth factor.

OBJECTIVES

  • To evaluate safety, tolerability and clinical efficacy of IFN beta-1a (Rebif® 22 mcg, tiw) in the treatment of AD

In this study, subjects were randomized into two groups: the first group (treatment arm, n=20) received Rebif® 22 mcg tiw; the second group (placebo arm, n=20) received placebo. The treatment period was for 28 weeks and subjects were followed up to Week 52. Efficacy was determined by comparing neuropsychological performance changes into placebo and treatment arms from screening/baseline to Week 52.

On Day 1 of the study treatment period, subjects received injection training and were administered the first dose of Rebif under the supervision of the clinical personnel by subcutaneous injection tiw at approximately the same time each day preferably in the late afternoon or evening. All subjects received 28 weeks of therapy and after 24 weeks from the therapy conclusion, a termination visit was conducted.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • CT
      • Catania, CT, Italy, 95122
        • U.VA. Neurologia - Azienda Ospedaliera Garibaldi Nesina

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects aged between 50 and 75 years
  • Subjects diagnosed with AD, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV)
  • Subjects with MMSE score of 20 to 26 (inclusive)
  • Subjects supervised by a caregiver
  • Subjects who have been given informed written consent and approval of the Local Ethical Committee

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with constant use in the 3 months prior study enrolment of other drugs that can modify the course of the disease (e.g. statins, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs] and steroids) or symptomatic cognitive treatments (e.g. cholinesterase inhibitors)
  • Subjects with modified Hachinski Ischemic Score ≥ 4
  • Subjects who are unable to undergo neuropsychological evaluation (including analphabetism)
  • Subjects with significant liver (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase , alkaline phosphatase > 2.0 times the upper limit of normal [ULN] of the local laboratory, or total bilirubin > 1.5 times the ULN of the local laboratory), thyroid (according to clinical judgment) or hematological dysfunctions (e.g. leucocytes ≤ 2.0 * 109/Liter [L]; platelets ≤ 100 * 109/L; hemoglobin ≤ 12 gram/deciliter [g/dL] for women and ≤ 13 g/dL for men, serum albumin ≤ 3 g/dL)
  • Subjects with history (past or recurrent) of depression unresponsive to medication or past medical history of suicidal ideation
  • Subjects with severe cardiac disease (angina, congestive heart failure class 3-4 New York Heart Association [NYHA] Functional Classification , or severe arrhythmia)
  • Subjects with epilepsy
  • Subjects with concomitant use of hypnotic, anxiolytic, antidepressant, antipsychotic, anticholinergic
  • Subjects with known allergic reactions against IFNs or other components of the applied drug

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment arm - Rebif®
Subjets in this arm received interferon beta-1a (Rebif® 22 mcg tiw)
Interferon (IFN) beta-1a [Rebif® 22 microgram (mcg), three times per week (tiw)] administered subcutaneously (sc)
Other Names:
  • Rebif®
Placebo Comparator: Placebo arm
Subjects in this arm received placebo
The inactive substance (placebo) looks the same as Interferon beta-1a (Rebif®), and is given the same way

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Score
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52
ADAS: global rating scale created to evaluate both cognitive and functional aspects linked with disease progression. ADAS-Cog: subscale of ADAS which consists in a series of short tests aimed to evaluate possible cognitive impairment due to disease progression. It includes 11 items, testing word-finding difficulty, following commands, naming: objects and fingers, orientation, word recognition, recall of test instructions, constructions, ideational praxis, spoken language ability, comprehension of spoken language and word recall. Scores range from 0 (no impairment) to 70 (serious deficit).
Baseline and Week 52

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Score
Time Frame: Week 12 and 28
ADAS: global rating scale created to evaluate both cognitive and functional aspects linked with disease progression. ADAS-Cog: subscale of ADAS which consists in a series of short tests aimed to evaluate possible cognitive impairment due to disease progression. It includes 11 items, testing word-finding difficulty, following commands, naming: objects and fingers, orientation, word recognition, recall of test instructions, constructions, ideational praxis, spoken language ability, comprehension of spoken language and word recall. Scores range from 0 (no impairment) to 70 (serious deficit).
Week 12 and 28
Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, 28 and 52
MMSE is a tool for screening cognitive decline associated with dementia. It is a brief examination intended to evaluate an adult participant's level of cognitive functioning. The test is performed in following areas: orientation in time and place, learning and immediate recall, mental control and concentration, short-term recall, naming ability, language expression, verbal comprehension, writing comprehension, writing ability and visual-spatial coordination. Scores range between 0 (maximum cognitive deficit) and 30 (no cognitive deficit).
Baseline, Week 12, 28 and 52
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Non-cognitive Subscale (ADAS-NonCog) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, 28 and 52
ADAS-NonCog is a subscale of ADAS aimed to evaluate the non-cognitive features such as mood state and behavioral changes. It takes about 10 minutes to be performed and includes 10 items: testing tearful, depressed mood, concentration/distractibility, uncooperative to testing, delusions, hallucinations, pacing, motor activity increase, tremors and appetite change. Scores range between 0 (excellent performance) and 35 (worst performance).
Baseline, Week 12, 28 and 52
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28 and 52
IADL is used to evaluate participants with early-stage disease, both to assess level of disease and to determine participant's ability of self-care. IADL scale measures functional impact of emotional, cognitive, and physical impairments. It provides information about participants' compromising rate and care he might need. It includes 8 items: testing ability to use telephone, shopping, food preparation, housekeeping, laundry, mode of transportation, responsibility for own medication and ability to handle finances. Scores range between 0 (impairment) and 8 (full independence).
Baseline, Week 28 and 52
Physical Self-Maintenance Scale (PSMS) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28 and 52
PSMS designed as a disability measure for use in planning and evaluating treatment in elderly participants living in community or in institutions, is Guttman scale containing 6 items of self-care. The scale is based on theory that human behavior can be ordered in a hierarchy of complexity, within each category, a further hierarchy of complexity runs from basic to complex activities. It includes 6 items, testing the following areas: toilet use, eating, dressing, physical appearance, deambulation and bath. Scores range between 0 (excellent performance) and 30 (worst performance).
Baseline, Week 28 and 52
Clinician's Interview Based Impression of Change (CIBIC-PLUS) Score
Time Frame: Week 28 and 52
CIBIC-PLUS: structured instrument based on comprehensive evaluation of 3 domains: participant cognition, behavior and functioning, including assessment of daily living activities. It includes 15 items and represents assessment of skilled clinician using validated scales based on the observation at interviews conducted separately with participant and caregiver familiar with behavior of participant. According to comparison between baseline and follow-up assessments, scores can range between 1 (markedly improved) and 7 (markedly worsened), with 4 indicating no change observed between two visits.
Week 28 and 52
Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28 and 52
The GDS consists of 30 'yes' or 'no' items aimed to assess depression. One point is assigned to each answer and the cumulative score is rated on a scoring grid. Scores are grouped as follows: 0-9 'normal', 10-19 'mildly depressed', and 20-30 'severely depressed'.
Baseline, Week 28 and 52
Global Deterioration Scale Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28 and 52
Global deterioration scale includes seven different diagnostic stages ranging between "no cognitive deterioration" and "very serious cognitive deterioration". It investigates the cognitive impairment. Scores range between 1 (no cognitive deterioration) and 7 (very severe cognitive decline).
Baseline, Week 28 and 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Andrea Paolillo, MD, PhD, Merck Serono S.P.A., Italy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

February 25, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 13, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2014

Last Verified

January 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer's Disease

Clinical Trials on Interferon beta-1a

3
Subscribe