An Acupuncture Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Study on Chronic Pain: Response Reliability and Dose Effect

July 12, 2017 updated by: Jian Kong, Massachusetts General Hospital

An Acupuncture fMRI Study on Chronic Pain: Response Reliability and Dose Effect

In this proposal, we plan to dynamically investigate brain response to verum acupuncture (of two different "doses") and placebo acupuncture, using a paradigm that approximates clinical acupuncture practice across multiple treatment sessions in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. This proposal aims to: 1) characterize session-to-session brain responses to verum / sham acupuncture treatment (reliability of response) for OA patients, and 2) investigate how different "doses" of acupuncture influence brain response and acupuncture efficacy (impact of dose). The findings of this project will deepen our biological understanding on why and how acupuncture can treat chronic pain and what happens in the brain during the multiple-session acupuncture treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States, 02129
        • Massachusetts General Hosptial

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

38 years to 68 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Volunteers 40-70 years of age.
  2. Meet the Classification Criteria of the American College of Rheumatology for osteoarthritis of the left / right knee for at least the past 3 months, as determined by the referring physician.
  3. Radiographic evidence of Grade 2 or 3 knee OA using the Kellgren-Lawrence Scale [78, 85-87].
  4. Patients must have moderate or greater clinically significant pain on most days during the past month (more than 15 days out of 30, of average daily pain of >3/10) in the left or right knee.
  5. At least a 10th grade English-reading level; English can be a second language provided that the patients feel they understand all the questions used in the assessment measures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any interventional procedure for knee pain, including corticosteroid injections (within 6 months, [88]) to the knee.
  2. Prior acupuncture treatment for any condition. Because we are using a placebo needle as a control, acupuncture-naive patients are necessary to maximize the benefits of blinding and to control expectancy.
  3. The intent to undergo surgery during the time of involvement in the study.
  4. Presence of any illness or medication use that is judged to interfere with the trial. For example: skin irritations around the knee such as psoriasis; bleeding disorders or anticoagulant use that would be contraindications for acupuncture; opioids or benzodiazepines, which may alter pain sensitivity and BOLD response.
  5. Knee pain due to other causes, such as inflammation or malignancy, other pain disorders that may refer pain to the leg, OA of ipsilateral hip, diagnosis of RA.
  6. Non-ambulatory status.
  7. History of cardiac, respiratory, or nervous system disease that, in the investigator's judgment, precludes participation in the study because of a heightened potential for adverse outcome. For example: asthma or claustrophobia.
  8. Presence of any contraindications to fMRI scanning. For example: cardiac pacemaker, metal implants, fear of closed spaces, pregnancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High dose acupuncture
six needle applied during acupuncture
patient will receive high dose, low dose or sham acupuncture treatment.
Experimental: Low dose acupuncture
two needles will be applied.
patient will receive high dose, low dose or sham acupuncture treatment.
Placebo Comparator: placebo acupuncture
sham acupuncture treatment will be applied
patient will receive high dose, low dose or sham acupuncture treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS Pain Rating) at 5-7 Weeks Post-Treatment
Time Frame: One post-treatment measurement 5-7 weeks after baseline
The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was used to measure clinical outcomes. KOOS is measured on a scale from 0-4 with 0 being no pain and 4 being extreme pain (the worst). The KOOS is comprised of 5 subscales, each of which produces an outcome score. These subscales include pain, other symptoms, function in daily living (ADL), function in sport and recreation, and knee-related quality of life (QOL). Based on previous studies, subscale scores of the KOOS related to pain, function in daily living, and function in sport and recreation were selected as the primary outcome of the present study. For each subscale, a normalized score was calculated, where 0 indicated the most extreme symptoms/pain and 100 indicated no symptoms/pain.
One post-treatment measurement 5-7 weeks after baseline
Cortical Thickness Changes at 5-7 Weeks Post-Treatment
Time Frame: 2 days; one at baseline and another post-treatment measurement taken 5-7 weeks after baseline
All eligible patients were scanned using fMRI while receiving treatment during acupuncture sessions 1, 3, and 6. Structural MRI data were only compared between Session 1 (pre-treatment) and Session 6 (post-treatment). The structural data was analyzed using FreeSurfer software.
2 days; one at baseline and another post-treatment measurement taken 5-7 weeks after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jian Kong, Massachusetts General Hosptial

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

March 3, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2009-P-000904
  • 1R21AT004497-01A2 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee

Clinical Trials on acupuncture

3
Subscribe