- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01094301
Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Post-Stroke Shoulder Pain
A Prospective Multi-Center Pilot Study of the SPR™ System for the Treatment of Post-Stroke Shoulder Pain
Post-stroke shoulder pain is defined as pain in the shoulder area that starts after a person has had a stroke. The SPR System is an investigational device that is being studied for the relief of post-stroke shoulder pain. The SPR System uses electrical stimulation and includes a Trial Stage (where a temporary system is used to see if the subject may benefit from this type of therapy) and may include an Implant Stage (where a small device is implanted under the skin in the chest). The SPR System delivers mild electrical stimulation to the shoulder where the subject feels pain. This research study will evaluate the effect of electrical stimulation on shoulder pain.
Individuals who are over the age of 21, who had a stroke at least six months ago, who experience shoulder pain, and have tried other therapies for their shoulder pain, may be eligible to participate in the first stage of the SPR System. Subjects meeting the specified success criteria at the conclusion of the SPR Trial Stage who experience a return of pain within 6 months of completion of the Trial Stage may be eligible for the second stage (SPR Implant Stage). This research study lasts a little over 3 years and may include 17 visits to the study doctor and at least 8 telephone calls from study staff.
Study Overview
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10065
- Weill Cornell Medical Center
-
-
North Carolina
-
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28203
- Carolinas Healthcare System/Carolinas Rehabilitation
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44109
- MetroHealth Medical Center
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, United States, 19027
- Moss Rehab/ Albert Einstein Healthcare Network
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Trial Stage Inclusion Criteria:
- At least 21 years of age
- Post-stroke shoulder pain
Trial Stage Exclusion Criteria:
- Use of habit-forming (narcotic) medications
- History of recurrent skin infections
- Bleeding disorder
- Parkinson's Disease, Spinal Cord Injury, traumatic brain injury, Multiple Sclerosis, or complex regional pain syndrome
- Heart arrhythmia or artificial heart valves
- Uncontrolled seizures
- Implanted Electronic Device
Implant Stage Inclusion Criteria
- Had a "return of pain" defined as an increase in pain of at least 2 points compared to the pain intensity score at Visit 5 and has a pain intensity score of at least 4
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NA
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: The SPR System
The SPR System is an investigational two-staged device which delivers stimulation to the shoulder.
Subjects with chronic post-stroke shoulder pain who meet eligibility criteria for the first stage (SPR Trial Stage) will receive a temporary Lead and External Stimulator.
Subjects who qualify and who agreed to proceed will advance to the second stage (SPR Implant Stage) which uses an Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG) and Implantable Lead.
Subjects will be followed until 36-months after IPG stimulation has been started.
|
The SPR System is an investigational two-staged device which delivers stimulation to the shoulder.
Subjects with chronic post-stroke shoulder pain who meet eligibility criteria for the first stage (SPR Trial Stage) will receive a temporary Lead and External Stimulator.
Subjects who qualify and who agreed to proceed will advance to the second stage (SPR Implant Stage) which uses an Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG) and Implantable Lead.
Subjects will be followed until 36-months after IPG stimulation has been started.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain Intensity (Trial Stage)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-week (Trial Stage), 6-week (Trial Stage)
|
Subjects were asked to report their worst pain score on an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine."
The average scores across subjects were reported for Baseline, 3-weeks (End of Placebo), and 6-weeks (End of Treatment).
|
Baseline, 3-week (Trial Stage), 6-week (Trial Stage)
|
Pain Intensity (Implant Stage)
Time Frame: 3-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, 9-months, 12-months, 24-months, and 36 months post IPG-Stim ON (Implant Stage)
|
Subjects were asked to report their worst pain score on an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine."
The average scores across subjects were reported for 3-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, 9-months, 12-months, 24-months, and 36 months post IPG-Stim ON.
|
3-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, 9-months, 12-months, 24-months, and 36 months post IPG-Stim ON (Implant Stage)
|
Device-Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: Total of 86 months (from when the first subjects enrolled to when the last subject completed the study)
|
At each study visit following the baseline assessment at Visit 1, subjects were questioned if any changes in their medical status or condition had occurred since their previous visit.
If the subject experienced a change that was an adverse event, an Adverse Event Form was completed by the site.
The number of subjects that experienced at least one study-related adverse event is reported here.
|
Total of 86 months (from when the first subjects enrolled to when the last subject completed the study)
|
Number of Subjects Who Were a Trial Stage Success
Time Frame: End of Treatment (EOT)
|
The number of subjects who were a trial stage success is presented.
Trial Stage Success for each subject was determined by a 2-point reduction in Brief Pain Inventory question 3 at the end of t.he Trial Stage beyond any placebo effect.
|
End of Treatment (EOT)
|
Number of Subjects Who Were an Implant Stage Success
Time Frame: 12-weeks post IPG-Stim ON
|
Number of subjects who were an Implant Stage Success is presented.
Implant Stage Success for each subject was determined by a 2-point reduction in Brief Pain Inventory question 3 at 12-week post IPG stimulation ON beyond any placebo effect.
|
12-weeks post IPG-Stim ON
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain Interference (Trial Stage)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-week (Trial Stage), 6-week (Trial Stage)
|
Subjects were asked to rate the degree to which their pain has interfered with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep and enjoyment of life on an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "does not interfere" and 10 represents "completely interferes."
The average scores across subjects were reported for Baseline, 3-weeks (End of Placebo), and 6-weeks (End of Treatment).
|
Baseline, 3-week (Trial Stage), 6-week (Trial Stage)
|
Pain-Free Passive Range of Motion (Trial Stage)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-week (Trial Stage), 6-week (Trial Stage);
|
Pain-Free Passive Range of Motion (ROM) was assessed.
The average ROMs for all subjects were reported for Baseline, 3-weeks (End of Placebo), and 6-weeks (End of Treatment).
|
Baseline, 3-week (Trial Stage), 6-week (Trial Stage);
|
Quality of Life (Trial Stage)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-week (Trial Stage), 6-week (Trial Stage)
|
Subjects were asked to complete the Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) to assess basic physical functioning and emotional well-being regardless of the disease or treatment.
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section.
Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight.
The lower the score the more disability.
The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
To calculate the scores it is necessary to purchase special software.
The eight domains are physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, social functioning, bodily pain, general mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality, and general health perceptions.
The mean scores for Baseline, 3-week (End of Placebo), and 6-week (End of Treatment) were reported.
|
Baseline, 3-week (Trial Stage), 6-week (Trial Stage)
|
Number of Participants Completing the Economic Impact Survey
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Subjects were asked to document pain medication, doctor visits, supplies, related treatments, need for caregivers, time spent in skilled nursing facilities, and lost work due to their shoulder pain.
This data was collected from subjects at Baseline and asked to recall this data for the 6-months prior to study enrollment.
National average costs were not available for these data points, and therefore the overall economic impact of shoulder pain could not be reported.
|
Baseline
|
Emotional Functioning (Trial Stage)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-week (Trial Stage), 6-week (Trial Stage)
|
Subjects were asked to complete the Beck Depression Inventory Version 2 (BDI-II), a 21 question survey to assess depressive symptoms.
Each answer was scored on a scale value of 0 to 3 and a sum was taken for all 21 questions.
Higher total scores indicated more severe depressive symptoms.
The standardized cutoffs used were: 0-13: minimal depression, 14-19: mild depression, 20-28: moderate depression, and 29-63: severe depression.
Mean BDI-II scores were calculated across subjects and were reported for Baseline, 3-weeks (End of Placebo), and 6-weeks (End of Treatment).
|
Baseline, 3-week (Trial Stage), 6-week (Trial Stage)
|
User Satisfaction (Trial Stage)
Time Frame: 6-week (Trial Stage)
|
Subjects completed a sponsor-developed survey with questions pertaining to their feelings about the Smartpatch Stimulation System as a method for managing post-stroke shoulder pain.
|
6-week (Trial Stage)
|
Global Impact of Stimulation Therapy (Trial Stage)
Time Frame: 3-week (Trial Stage), 6-week (Trial Stage)
|
The Patient Global Impression of Change asks subjects to rate their improvement with treatment on a 7-point scale ranging from "very much worse" to "very much improved".
The subjects combine all the components of their experience into one overall score.
|
3-week (Trial Stage), 6-week (Trial Stage)
|
Quality of Life (Implant Stage)
Time Frame: 3-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, 9-months, 12-months post IPG-Stim ON (Implant Stage)
|
Subjects were asked to complete the Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) to assess basic physical functioning and emotional well-being regardless of the disease or treatment.
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section.
Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight.
The lower the score the more disability.
The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
To calculate the scores it is necessary to purchase special software.
The eight domains are physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, social functioning, bodily pain, general mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality, and general health perceptions.
The mean scores for 3-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, 9-months, and 12-months, post IPG-Stim ON were reported.
|
3-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, 9-months, 12-months post IPG-Stim ON (Implant Stage)
|
Pain Interference (Implant Stage)
Time Frame: 3-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, 9-months, 12-months post IPG-Stim ON (Implant Stage)
|
Subjects were asked to rate the degree to which their pain has interfered with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep and enjoyment of life on an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "does not interfere" and 10 represents "completely interferes."
The average scores across subjects were reported for 3-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, 9-months, and 12-months post IPG-Stim On.
|
3-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, 9-months, 12-months post IPG-Stim ON (Implant Stage)
|
Pain-Free Passive Range of Motion (Implant Stage)
Time Frame: 3-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, 9-months, 12-months post IPG-Stim ON (Implant Stage)
|
Pain-Free Passive Range of Motion (ROM) was assessed.
The average ROMs for all subjects were reported for 3-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, 9-months, and 12-months post IPG-Stim ON.
|
3-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, 9-months, 12-months post IPG-Stim ON (Implant Stage)
|
Emotional Functioning (Implant Stage)
Time Frame: 3-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, 9-months, 12-months post IPG-Stim ON (Implant Stage)
|
Subjects were asked to complete the Beck Depression Inventory Version 2 (BDI-II), a 21 question survey to assess depressive symptoms.
Each answer was scored on a scale value of 0 to 3 and a sum was taken for all 21 questions.
Higher total scores indicated more severe depressive symptoms.
The standardized cutoffs used were: 0-13: minimal depression, 14-19: mild depression, 20-28: moderate depression, and 29-63: severe depression.
Mean BDI-II scores were calculated across subjects and were reported for 3-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, 9-months, and 12-months post IPG-Stim ON.
|
3-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, 9-months, 12-months post IPG-Stim ON (Implant Stage)
|
Global Impact of Stimulation Therapy (Implant Stage)
Time Frame: 3-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, 9-months, 12-months, 24-months, and 36-months Post IPG-Stim ON (Implant Stage)
|
The Patient Global Impression of Change asks subjects to rate their improvement with treatment on a 7-point scale ranging from "very much worse" to "very much improved".
The subjects combine all the components of their experience into one overall score.
|
3-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, 9-months, 12-months, 24-months, and 36-months Post IPG-Stim ON (Implant Stage)
|
User Satisfaction (Implant Stage)
Time Frame: 12-weeks,12-months post IPG-Stim ON (Implant Stage)
|
Subjects completed a sponsor-developed survey with questions pertaining to their feelings about the IPG System as a method for managing post-stroke shoulder pain.
|
12-weeks,12-months post IPG-Stim ON (Implant Stage)
|
Reduction in Arm Impairment and Improvement in Activities of Daily Living (Trial Stage)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-week (Trial Stage), 6-week (Trial Stage)
|
Subjects were asked to assess their arm impairment using the Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS) test.
The SULCS is a validated upper limb capacity scale which includes tasks directly related to activities of daily living individuals experience in their home environment.
The SULCS consists of 10 items, with each item having a possible score of 0 or 1: 3 items for arm capacity without active hand capacity; 4 items for arm capacity and basic hand capacity; and, 3 items for complex hand capacity.
These scores were summed with a higher score indicating better capacity, with 10 being the max score.
The average score across subjects were reported for Baseline, 3-weeks (End of Placebo), and 6-weeks (End of Trial Stage).
|
Baseline, 3-week (Trial Stage), 6-week (Trial Stage)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NDI-0122-CSP-001
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Shoulder Pain
-
Helping Hand Institute of Rehabilitation SciencesRecruitingShoulder Injuries | Shoulder Capsulitis | Shoulder Arthritis | Shoulder Impingement | Shoulder Bursitis | Shoulder Pain ChronicPakistan
-
University of Southern DenmarkRegion of Southern Denmark; The Danish Rheumatism Association; Esbjerg Municipality and other collaboratorsCompletedHypermobility Syndrome Shoulder | Shoulder Pain Chronic | Shoulder LuxationDenmark
-
Oslo University HospitalUnknownShoulder Impingement Syndrome | Subacromial Shoulder PainNorway
-
Şeyhmus KAPLANCompletedSubacromial Impingement | Pain, Shoulder
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)Istanbul Aydın UniversityCompletedPain, Shoulder | Myofacial Pain | Adhesion; ShoulderTurkey
-
Mohamed R El TahanCompletedUnilateral Chronic Shoulder Pain | Bilateral Chronic Shoulder PainEgypt
-
Makassed General HospitalRecruiting
-
Zagazig UniversityCompleted
-
Helping Hand Institute of Rehabilitation SciencesCompletedShoulder Injuries | Shoulder Pain | Shoulder Capsulitis | Frozen Shoulder | Shoulder ImpingementPakistan
-
Hasan Kalyoncu UniversityHacettepe UniversityCompletedShoulder Pain | Shoulder Injury | Shoulder ImpingementTurkey
Clinical Trials on The SPR System
-
Jon SnaedalKarolinska University Hospital; Ullevaal University Hospital; Zealand University... and other collaboratorsUnknown
-
TakedaActive, not recruiting
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiSana Health, Inc.CompletedPain | Chronic Pain | Neuropathic PainUnited States
-
University of California, San DiegoCongressionally Directed Medical Research ProgramsEnrolling by invitationRotator Cuff Repair | Ankle Arthroplasty or Arthrodesis | Hallux Valgus (Bunion) ResectionUnited States
-
University of California, San DiegoThe Cleveland Clinic; Augusta University; United States Naval Medical Center,... and other collaboratorsCompletedRotator Cuff Repair | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction | Ankle Arthrodesis or Arthroplasty | Hallux Valgus CorrectionUnited States
-
Oslo University HospitalUnknownHypertension, Resistant to Conventional TherapyNorway
-
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De MarseilleUnknownGynecological SurgeryFrance
-
Acessa Health, Inc.CompletedUterine Fibroids | Uterine MyomasUnited States, Guatemala, Mexico
-
Abbott Medical DevicesTerminated
-
National Institute on Aging (NIA)Completed