Immunotherapy of HLA-A2 Positive Stage II-IV Melanoma Patients (LAG-3/IMP321)

Vaccination of Melanoma Patients (Stage II-IV) With ImmuFact IMP321, Tumor Antigenic Peptides and Montanide

The purpose of this study is to determine whether vaccination with tumor antigenic peptides and both IMP321/LAG-3 and Montanide adjuvants can induce an immune response in melanoma patients and to assess the safety and tolerability of this vaccination. Tumor responses following this vaccination will also be documented.

Study Overview

• Status: Terminated
• Conditions: Melanoma
• Intervention / Treatment: Biological: 2 vaccine injections in 1 limb; Biological: 2 vaccine injections in distinct limbs; Biological: 2 "vaccine injections" in distinct limbs

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this study is:

• to evaluate melanoma antigen specific immune response induced by this vaccination with tumor antigenic peptides derived from MAGE-A3 (Melanoma Antigen family A3) (MHCI: MAGE-A3.A2 and MHCII: MAGE-A3.DP4), NY-ESO-1 (New York Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma antigen-1), Melan A (analog ELA and native EAA) and NA-17A with IMP321 (ImmuFact)/ LAG-3Ig (Lymphocyte activation gene-3 immunoglobulin-like domains) as adjuvant/immunostimulant, formulated with Montanide ISA-51.
• to assess the safety and tolerability of this vaccination

The secondary objective is to document tumor responses in patients following this vaccination.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 16
• Phase: Phase 2; Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Switzerland
  • Vaud
    • Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, 1011
      • Oncology Department, CHUV

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Histologically confirmed stage II, III or IV melanoma patients.
• Tumor expression of Melan-A.
• Human leukocyte antigen-A2 (HLA-A2) positive.
• Expected survival of at list 3 months.
• Karnofsky scale performance status of 70 % or more.
• Age ≥ 18 years.
• Able to give a written informed consent.
• The following laboratory results:

Hemoglobin ≥ 100g/L, Neutrophil count ≥ 1.5 x 109/L, Lymphocyte count ≥ 0.5 x 109/L, Platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/L, Serum creatinine ≤ 2 mg/dL (0.18mmol/L), Serum bilirubin ≤ 2mg/dL (0.034mmol/L), Granulocyte count > 2.5x109/L, Aspartate Amino Transférase (ASAT), Alanine Amino Transferase (ALAT) < 2.5 x upper limit of normal, Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) within the normal ranges ±25%, Thromplastin (TP) ≥ 80%

Exclusion Criteria:

• Clinically significant heart disease.
• Serious illness, eg. serious infections requiring antibiotics, uncontrolled peptic ulcer, or central nervous system disorders.
• History of immunodeficiency disease or autoimmune disease.
• Metastatic disease to the central nervous system, unless treated and stable.
• Known HIV positivity.
• Known seropositivity for hepatitis B surface antigen.
• Concomitant treatment with steroids, antihistamine drugs. Topical or inhalation steroids are permitted.
• Participation in any other clinical trial involving another investigational agent within 4 weeks prior to enrollment.
• Pregnancy or lactation.
• Women of childbearing potential not using a medically acceptable means of contraception.
• Psychiatric or addictive disorders that may compromise the ability to give informed consent.
• Lack of availability of the patient for immunological and clinical follow-up assessment.
• Coagulation or bleeding disorders.
• Kidney dysfunction with creatinine > 2 X the upper limit of the normal value.
• Reported strong (allergic) reactions to previous vaccination.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Non-Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 2 vaccine injections in 1 limb; 9 patients initially planned: patients received peptides with IMP321/LAG-3Ig and Montanide in 2 injections sites at 5 cm distance from each other 2 vaccine injections in same limb (vaccine 1 : NY-ESO-1, MAGE-3.A2, NA-17 peptides + IMP321 + Montanide) (vaccine 2 : Melan-A, MAGE-A3-DP4 peptides + IMP321 + Montanide)	Biological: 2 vaccine injections in 1 limb; Participants receive the vaccine separated in 2 syringes with syringe 1 containing NA-17, MAGE-3.A2 and NY-ESO-1 peptides with IMP321/LAG3 ± Montanide, and syringe 2 containing Melan-A and MAGE-A3-DP4 peptides with IMP321/LAG-3 ± Montanide. The content of each syringe is injected s.c. in the same limb at about 5 cm distance from each other.; Other Names: vaccine1: NY-ESO-1,MAGE-3.A2, NA-17, IMP321, Montanide; vaccine 2: Melan-A, MAGE-A3-DP4 , IMP321, Montanide
Experimental: 2 vaccine injections in distinct limbs; Groupe2: 2 vaccine injections in different limb should include 9 patients that were initially planned: patients received the same vaccine in 2 syringes injected each in a distinct limb (vaccine 1: NY-ESO-1, MAGE-3.A2, NA-17 peptides + IMP321 + Montanide) (vaccine 2: Melan-A, MAGE-A3-DP4 peptides + IMP321 + Montanide)	Biological: 2 vaccine injections in distinct limbs; Participants receive the vaccine separated in 2 syringes with syringe 1 containing NA-17, MAGE-3.A2 and NY-ESO-1 peptides with IMP321/LAG3 ± Montanide, and syringe 2 containing Melan-A and MAGE-A3-DP4 peptides with IMP321/LAG-3 ± Montanide.The content of each syringe is injected s.c. in different limbs.; Other Names: vaccine 1: NY-ESO-1, MAGE-3.A2, NA-17,IMP321, Montanide; vaccine 2: Melan-A, MAGE-A3-DP4, IMP321, Montanide)
Experimental: 2 "vaccine injections" in distinct limbs; Groupe3: 2 vaccine injections in distinct limb should include 9 patients that were initially planned; due to premature trial termination, no patients could be enrolled. Patients of this group should have received the same vaccine but without the MHC class II peptide (MAGE-A3)	Biological: 2 "vaccine injections" in distinct limbs; Other Names: vaccine 1: NY-ESO-1, NA-17, IMP321, Montanide; vaccine 2: Melan-A, NA-17, IMP321, Montanide

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Ex Vivo Frequency of Melan-A Specific CD8+T Cells	Cellular immunity was evaluated through the activation and the expansion of Melan-A-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Their frequency was measured in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) directly ex vivo (i.e. without prior in vitro expansion) by multicolor flow cytometry with Melan-A ELA tetramers. The fold change for each time point compared to baseline was calculated as: Melan-A-specific CD8+ T cell frequency at the time point/ Melan-A-specific CD8+ T cell frequency at baseline. Significant T cell response is defined by at least 2-fold change of Melan-A-specific CD8+ T cell frequency as compared to pre-immunotherapy.	Melan-A specific CD8+ T cells were measured in PBMC collected at the end of Cycle 1 (Week 7), end of Cycle 2 (Week 25), end of Cycle 3 (Week 40), and Follow-up (6 to 18 months after the end of Cycle 3).
In Vitro Frequency of MAGE A3.DP4-specific CD4+ T Cells Producing Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)	The activation of peptide-specific CD4+ T cells was analyzed in vitro before and after vaccination by Intracellular Cytokine Staining (ICS). From each patient, total CD4+ T-cells were stimulated in the presence of peptide MAGE-A3.DP4 LP (MAGE-A3243-258 peptide presented by autologous cells). After 10 days, cell cultures were challenged for 4h with the peptide or left unchallenged. Specific CD4+ T cells responses were identified via detection of IFN-γ producing cells.	MAGE A3.DP4 specific CD4+ T cells producing IFN-γ were measured in PBMC collected at the end of Cycle 1 (Week 7), end of Cycle 2 (Week 25), end of Cycle 3 (Week 40), and Follow-up (6 to 18 months after the end of Cycle 3).
In Vitro Frequency of MAGE A3.DP4-specific CD4+ T Cells Producing Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α)	The activation of peptide-specific CD4+ T cells was analyzed in vitro before and after vaccination by ICS. From each patient, total CD4+ T-cells were stimulated in the presence of peptide MAGE-A3.DP4 LP (MAGE-A3243-258 peptide presented by autologous cells). After 10 days, cell cultures were challenged for 4h with the peptide or left unchallenged. Specific CD4+ T cells responses were identified via detection of TNF-α producing cells.	MAGE A3.DP4 specific CD4+ T-cells producing TNF-α were measured in PBMC collected at the end of Cycle 1 (Week 7), end of Cycle 2 (Week 25), end of Cycle 3 (Week 40), and Follow-up (6 to 18 months after the end of Cycle 3).
In Vitro Frequency of MAGE A3.DP4-specific CD4+ T Cells	Frequencies of specific MAGE-A3.DP4-specific CD4+ T cells were quantified by flow cytometry using class II tetramers after 10 days of in vitro stimulation. The fold change for each time point compared to baseline was calculated as: MAGE-A3.DP4-specific CD4+ T cell frequency at the time point/ MAGE-A3.DP4-specific CD4+ T cell frequency at baseline.	MAGE A3.DP4 specific CD4+ T cells were measured in PBMC collected at the end of Cycle 1 (Week 7), end of Cycle 2 (Week 25), end of Cycle 3 (Week 40) and Follow-up (6 to 18 months after the end of Cycle 3).
In Vitro Frequency of Melan-A-specific CD8+T Cells After Stimulation	After 12 days of in vitro stimulation with Melan-A peptides, CD8+ T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry using tetramer staining. The fold change for each time point compared to baseline was calculated as: Melan-A-specific CD8+ T cell frequency at the time point/ Melan-A-specific CD8+ T cell frequency at baseline. Significant T cell response is defined by at least 2-fold change of Melan-A-specific CD8+ T cell frequency as compared to pre-immunotherapy.	In vitro stimulated Melan-A specific CD8+ T cells were measured in PBMC collected at the end of Cycle 1 (Week 7), end of Cycle 2 (Week 25), end of Cycle 3 (Week 40) and Follow-up (6 to 18 months after the end of Cycle 3).
In Vitro Frequency of NY-ESO-1-specific CD8+ T Cells	After 12 days of in vitro stimulation with NY-ESO-1 peptide, CD8+ T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry using tetramer staining. The fold change for each time point compared to baseline was calculated as: NY-ESO-1-specific CD8+ T cell frequency at the time point/ NY-ESO-1-specific CD8+ T cell frequency at baseline.	In vitro stimulated NY-EYO-1 specific CD8+ T cells were measured in PBMC collected at the end of Cycle 1 (Week 7), end of Cycle 2 (Week 25), end of Cycle 3 (Week 40), and Follow-up (6 to 18 months after the end of Cycle 3).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Tumor Response	The assessment of the baseline disease status was performed, using CT (Computed Tomography) scan or PET (Positron Emission Tomography)/ CT scan, at screening visit or within 8 weeks preceding the screening visit. Imagery examinations occurred after the end of each vaccination cycle. The tumor response was assessed according to the classification World Health Organization (WHO) 1979 and defined as: No evidence of disease (NED),; Stable disease (SD): change in size of all measurable lesions (the sum of the products of the greatest and perpendicular parameters), of less than a 25% increase or 25% decrease from baseline for at least 4 weeks, without appearance of new lesions or progression of any lesion.; Progressive disease (PD): appearance of new tumors, or increase in size of any measurable tumor by at least 25% of the sum of the product of the greatest and perpendicular diameter.	Change from baseline in tumor response at the end of Cycle 1 (Week 7), end of Cycle 2 (Week 25) and end of Cycle 3 (Week 40)

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
• Collaborators: Immutep S.A.S.
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Olivier Michielin, MD PhD, Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Sierro S, Romero P, Speiser DE. The CD4-like molecule LAG-3, biology and therapeutic applications. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2011 Jan;15(1):91-101. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2011.540563.
• Brignone C, Escudier B, Grygar C, Marcu M, Triebel F. A phase I pharmacokinetic and biological correlative study of IMP321, a novel MHC class II agonist, in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Oct 1;15(19):6225-31. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0068. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
• Speiser DE, Romero P. Molecularly defined vaccines for cancer immunotherapy, and protective T cell immunity. Semin Immunol. 2010 Jun;22(3):144-54. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2010.03.004. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
• Legat A, Maby-El Hajjami H, Baumgaertner P, Cagnon L, Abed Maillard S, Geldhof C, Iancu EM, Lebon L, Guillaume P, Dojcinovic D, Michielin O, Romano E, Berthod G, Rimoldi D, Triebel F, Luescher I, Rufer N, Speiser DE. Vaccination with LAG-3Ig (IMP321) and Peptides Induces Specific CD4 and CD8 T-Cell Responses in Metastatic Melanoma Patients--Report of a Phase I/IIa Clinical Trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Mar 15;22(6):1330-40. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1212. Epub 2015 Oct 23.

Helpful Links

• Multidisciplinary Oncology Center, CHUV, Lausanne

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): June 1, 2010
• Primary Completion (Actual): April 1, 2014
• Study Completion (Actual): April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: March 3, 2011
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 3, 2011
• First Posted (Estimate): March 4, 2011

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): June 11, 2020
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 26, 2020
• Last Verified: May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Immunotherapy; Melanoma; Vaccination; Montanide ISA-51; IMP321; Stage II-IV; HLA class I and II tumor-specific peptides
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Neoplasms by Histologic Type; Neoplasms; Neuroectodermal Tumors; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal; Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Nevi and Melanomas; Melanoma; Physiological Effects of Drugs; Immunologic Factors; Adjuvants, Immunologic; Vaccines; Monatide (IMS 3015)
• Other Study ID Numbers: P009-2010DR1082