Internet Intervention for Adolescents With Chronic Pain

Web-MAP 2: Internet Intervention for Adolescents With Chronic Pain

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a web-based (i.e., internet) behavioral program to reduce pain and improve functioning in children and adolescents with chronic pain. We hypothesize that children and adolescents in families that receive the web-based behavioral program will report reduced pain levels and improved daily functioning compared to children and their parents who receive online patient education.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Chronic Pain; Abdominal Pain; Headache
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Online Behavioral Intervention; Other: Education: Online Patient Education

Detailed Description

An estimated 15% to 30% of otherwise healthy children and adolescents suffer from recurrent or chronic pain such as headache, abdominal pain, and musculoskeletal pain. Chronic pain has a significant impact on children's mood, daily functioning, and overall quality of life. Effective behavioral interventions have been developed to increase positive coping behaviors. However, most children do not have access to these interventions due to a variety of barriers such as distance from pediatric pain treatment centers. We have developed an online behavioral intervention called Web-based Management of Adolescent Pain (Web-MAP), and our preliminary findings indicated that children in families that received this intervention experienced significant improvements in their pain level and daily functioning compared to children who did not receive the intervention (Palermo et al., 2009). The purpose of this study is to extend these findings by: 1) recruiting families from other medical centers, 2) determining whether the benefits of online behavioral intervention are maintained 6- and 12-months after the intervention has been completed, 3) evaluating additional outcomes such as parent responses to pain and child sleep quality, anxiety, depression, and health service use, 4) comparing results from online behavioral intervention to online patient education.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 273
• Phase: Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Washington
    • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98105
      • Seattle Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 11 years to 17 years (Child)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Literate in English
• Age 11-17 years
• Pain present for at least 3 months duration
• Pain occurs at least 1 time per week and interferes with daily functioning
• Pain is not related to a chronic disease
• Receiving evaluation or treatment in a pediatric pain clinic
• Has access to a computer, the Internet, and a phone

Exclusion Criteria:

• A serious comorbid chronic condition in the patient (e.g., diabetes, arthritis, cancer).
• Non-English speaking
• More than 4 sessions of CBT for pain management in the 6 months prior to the time of screening.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Online Behavioral Intervention; In addition to standard medical care, children and parents in the online behavioral intervention will receive access to the full web-based program including education about chronic pain, training in behavioral and cognitive coping skills, instruction in increasing activity participation, and education about pain behaviors and parental operant strategies using an engaging, interactive format on the Internet.	Behavioral: Online Behavioral Intervention; The online behavioral intervention is travel-themed and participants visit 8 destinations (1 per week) designed to take 30 min each to complete. The destinations serve as an online analog for the weekly sessions used when delivering behavioral interventions face-to-face. The 8 child destinations include: 1) education about chronic pain, 2) recognizing stress and negative emotions, 3) relaxation and distraction skills, 4) school, 5) cognitive skills, 6) sleep hygiene and lifestyle, 7) staying active, and 8) relapse prevention. The eight parent destinations include: 1) education about chronic pain, 2) recognizing stress and negative emotions, 3) operant strategies I, 4) operant strategies II, 5) modeling, 6) sleep hygiene and lifestyle, 7) communication, and 8) relapse prevention.; Other Names: Internet Intervention
Active Comparator: Online Patient Education; The Online Patient Education group will serve as an attention control condition. In addition to standard medical care, children and parents will be provided with access to a modified version of the study website that will provide information from publicly available educational websites about pediatric chronic pain management.	Other: Education: Online Patient Education; The purpose of the online patient education group is to control for time, attention, and computer usage. Children and parents will be provided with access to a modified version of the study website that will provide links to information from publicly available educational websites about pediatric chronic pain management. Children and parents will log onto the web program weekly at the same interval as the Online Behavioral Intervention group. Children and parents will be asked to view 3 links each week and then report a few details pertaining to the content of what they viewed.; Other Names: Online Attention Control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Activity limitations	Child report of activity limitations will be assessed using the prospective version of the Child Activity Limitations Interview (Palermo, Witherspoon, Valenzuela, & Drotar, 2004), which includes 8 activities that children identify as important in their day-to-day lives that are impacted by pain. Responses are rated on a 5-point scale (0-4) with higher scores indicating greater perceived difficulty with activities. Children will provide ratings daily for 7 days on their online diaries at each assessment period. Mean activity limitations across the reporting period is used in analyses.	pre-treatment, immediately post-treatment, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Pain intensity	Children will report on presence and intensity of pain daily for 7 days at each assessment period. Pain intensity will be assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) with anchors of 0= no pain to 10= worst pain (McGrath et al., 2008). Mean average intensity of the pain reported will serve as primary pain measure.	pre-treatment, immediately post-treatment, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Depression and pain-specific anxiety	Children will complete the Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire (BAPQ), a 61-item scale that will be used to measure pain-specific emotional functioning (Eccleston et al., 2005). The BAPQ was developed specifically for children with chronic pain and has demonstrated adequate reliability and validity (Eccleston et al., 2008). For the purpose of this study, the subscales of depression and pain-specific anxiety will be used in analyses.	pre-treatment, immediately post-treatment, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Treatment Satisfaction	Children and parents will complete this questionnaire, which includes items that address satisfaction with the therapeutic process during the course of treatment and satisfaction with the outcome of therapy. Items are rated on a 5-point scale from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree.	Immediately Post-Treatment, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Parental Response to Pain Behavior	Children and their parents will complete the Adult Responses to Children's Symptoms (ARCS), a 29-item measure assessing parental responses to child pain behavior (Walker, Levy, & Whitehead, 2006). Respondents rate on a five-point Likert scale the frequency with which parents engage in specific behaviors in response to their child's pain.	pre-treatment, immediately post-treatment, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Sleep Quality	Children's perception of sleep quality will be measured by the Adolescent Sleep Wake Scale (LeBourgeois et al., 2005), a 28-item self-report scale that assesses five behavioral dimensions of teens' sleep: going to bed, falling asleep, maintaining sleep, reinitiating sleep, and returning to wakefulness. Subscale scores range from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating better sleep quality.	pre-treatment, immediately post-treatment, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Health service Use	Parents will complete the Client Service Receipt Inventory-Pain version (Sleed et al., 2005), a measure of service use, out-of-pocket expenses, and lost work time incurred by families for the evaluation or management of the child's chronic pain. Questions pertain to hospital admissions, outpatient services, community services (e.g., tutor, lawyer), medications, lost work time, paid help, and other costs. We will compute the following variables: total number of services used, number of lost parental work days, and number of out-of-pocket expenses.	pre-treatment, 12-month follow-up
Miscarried Helping	Parents and adolescents will complete the Helping for Health Inventory (Harris et al., 2008), a 15-item scale that measures miscarried helping or negative social support. Respondents rate on a 5-point scale the frequency with which parents engage in certain behaviors or feel certain ways pertaining to their child's health.	pre-treatment, immediately post-treatment, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Seattle Children's Hospital
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Tonya M. Palermo, Ph.D., University of Washington Medical School

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Palermo TM, Law EF, Zhou C, Holley AL, Logan D, Tai G. Trajectories of change during a randomized controlled trial of internet-delivered psychological treatment for adolescent chronic pain: how does change in pain and function relate? Pain. 2015 Apr;156(4):626-634. doi: 10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460355.17246.6c.
• Law EF, Groenewald CB, Zhou C, Palermo TM. Effect on Health Care Costs for Adolescents Receiving Adjunctive Internet-Delivered Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pain. 2018 Aug;19(8):910-919. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 22.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: May 1, 2011
• Primary Completion (Actual): November 1, 2015
• Study Completion (Actual): November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: March 11, 2011
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 14, 2011
• First Posted (Estimate): March 16, 2011

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): October 3, 2018
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 2, 2018
• Last Verified: October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Adolescents; Abdominal Pain; Chronic Pain; Headache; Internet Interventions; Behavioral Interventions
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Signs and Symptoms, Digestive; Chronic Pain; Abdominal Pain; Headache
• Other Study ID Numbers: R01HD062538-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No