Safety, Pharmacokinetics (PK), and Efficacy of Buprenorphine Transdermal System (BTDS) in Children

June 7, 2017 updated by: Purdue Pharma LP

An Open-label, Multicenter Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Buprenorphine Transdermal System (BTDS) in Children From 7 to 16 Years of Age, Inclusive, Who Require Continuous Opioid Analgesia for Moderate to Severe Pain

The purpose of this study is to characterize the safety, PK, and efficacy of BTDS in patients of ages 7 to 16 years.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

A study of safety, PK, and efficacy of BTDS in patients of ages 7 to 16 years, inclusive, who require continuous opioid analgesia for moderate to severe pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

41

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Long Beach, California, United States, 90806
        • Long Beach Memorial Medical Center
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90027
        • Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095-1752
        • Children's Health Center
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Children's Hospital Colorado
    • Connecticut
      • Hartford, Connecticut, United States, 06106
        • Connecticut Children's Medical Center
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, D.C., District of Columbia, United States, 20060
        • Howard University Hospital
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • Jackson Memorial Hospital / University of Miami
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
        • Kosair Charities Pediatric Clinical Research Unit - University of Louisville
    • Louisiana
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71118
        • Willis-Knighton Physician Network
    • New Jersey
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08901
        • Saint Peter's University Hospital
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • WCMC, Department of Pediatrics - Hematology/Oncology
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11794
        • Stony Brook University Hospital
      • The Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Children's Hospital at Montefiore
    • North Carolina
      • Greenville, North Carolina, United States, 27834
        • Vidant Medical Center
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
        • The Center for Clinical Research - Carolina Pain Institute
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15224
        • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903
        • Rhode Island Hospital, Department of Pediatrics
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78723
        • Children's Blood and Cancer Center
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78258
        • Road Runner Research, Ltd.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 16 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria include:

  • Male and female patients, 7 to 16 years of age, inclusive, with malignant and/or nonmalignant moderate to severe pain requiring or anticipated to require continuous, around-the-clock, opioid treatment for at least 2 weeks (based on the investigator's judgment);
  • Patients must have written informed consent provided by the parent or legal guardian and assent provided by the patient, when appropriate;
  • Patients on incoming opioids must be taking ≤ 80 mg/day morphine or equivalent if aged 12 to 16 years or ≤ 40 mg/day morphine or equivalent if aged 7 to 11 years prior to the screening visit;
  • Patients and patient's parent/caregiver must be compliant with the protocol, ie, must be able to perform study assessments and understand and complete the age-appropriate scale to rate pain intensity. Patients must not have a cognitive developmental delay or any other condition that would preclude them from completing the age-appropriate pain scale.

Exclusion Criteria include:

  • Patients who are allergic to buprenorphine or have a history of allergies to other opioids (this criterion does not include patients who have experienced common opioid side effects [eg, nausea, constipation]) or who have allergies or other contraindications to transdermal delivery systems or patch adhesives;
  • Patients with a dermatological disorder, including burn and skin graft sites, at any relevant patch application site that would preclude proper placement and/or rotation of BTDS patches;
  • Patients with evidence of impaired renal function;
  • Patients with hepatic impairment;
  • Patients with history of seizures;
  • Patients with intracranial pressure;
  • Patients who have a history of sleep apnea within the past year;
  • Patients who require mechanical ventilation during study treatment period, are cyanotic, or who have unstable respiratory disease;
  • Patients with clinically significant structural heart disease or a pacemaker;
  • Patients with clinically unstable cardiac disease;
  • Patients who receive or anticipate to receive investigational medication/therapy during study drug treatment period.

Other protocol-specific inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Overall BTDS
Buprenorphine transdermal system
Buprenorphine transdermal system 2.5 mcg/h, 5 mcg/h, 10 mcg/h or 20 mcg/h applied transdermally for 7-day wear.
Other Names:
  • Butrans

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety
Time Frame: Up to 28 weeks
Safety assessments consisted of reports of AEs, vital signs (blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and temperature), weight, hemoglobin-oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2), clinical laboratory tests, somnolence (assessed by the University of Michigan Sedation Scale [UMSS]), conventional 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs), and 24-hour digital 12-lead ECGs (Holter monitor). Safety variables were summarized descriptively within age group for the safety population.
Up to 28 weeks
Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Buprenorphine Following Transdermal Administration: Apparent Clearance (CL/F)
Time Frame: Day 1, end of week 1, days 9/10, end of week 2, and end of week 4 or at discontinuation prior to end of study visit
The population PK (PopPK) of BTDS buprenorphine in pediatric patients ages 7 to 16 years was described by a 2-compartment model with sequential zero- and first-order absorption from the patch. A fixed allometric relationship was used to describe the effects of changes in ideal body weight (IBW) across pediatric patients on all clearance and volume parameters. Given the sparse sample collections, small sample size, and complexity of the absorption process with the patch formulation, this PopPK model was fit to the pediatric data using nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM) Bayes method with selective use of priors from previous adult PopPK results. Estimates of fixed effects from the final model were used to calculate the CL/F after patch dosing given the covariate distribution in the PopPK dataset and the typical weights from children in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) dataset.
Day 1, end of week 1, days 9/10, end of week 2, and end of week 4 or at discontinuation prior to end of study visit
Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Buprenorphine Following Transdermal Administration: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vc/F)
Time Frame: Day 1, end of week 1, days 9/10, end of week 2, and end of week 4 or at discontinuation prior to end of study visit
The population PK (PopPK) of BTDS buprenorphine in pediatric patients ages 7 to 16 years was described by a 2-compartment model with sequential zero- and first-order absorption from the patch. A fixed allometric relationship was used to describe the effects of changes in ideal body weight (IBW) across pediatric patients on all clearance and volume parameters. Given the sparse sample collections, small sample size, and complexity of the absorption process with the patch formulation, this PopPK model was fit to the pediatric data using nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM) Bayes method with selective use of priors from previous adult PopPK results. Estimates of fixed effects from the final model were used to calculate the Vc/F after patch dosing given the covariate distribution in the PopPK dataset and the typical weights from children in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) dataset.
Day 1, end of week 1, days 9/10, end of week 2, and end of week 4 or at discontinuation prior to end of study visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Right Now Assessment by Patients Aged 7 to 11 Years, Inclusive
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks

Pain right now was assessed using the Faces of Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). The FPS-R is a horizontal row of 6 faces representing pain intensity, with "no hurt" at the far left and "hurts worst" at the far right; the intensities are scored as 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10. A score of 0=no pain, and 10=very much pain. For screening to week 4, pain right now was assessed at 30 minutes before initial BTDS application on day 1; one hour after initial BTDS application on day 1; thereafter, once daily at approximately 8 PM for the first 4 weeks. Baseline score was the last assessment prior to the first dose. For weeks 1-4, weekly averages of the pain right now scores were calculated using the sum of all available pain right now scores recorded daily during a given week divided by the number of available scores.

The study measured pain right now for weeks 6-24 once a week at approximately 8 PM while on treatment; however, no patients in this age group were treated beyond week 12.

Up to 24 weeks
Pain Right Now Assessment by Patients Aged 12 to 16 Years, Inclusive
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks

Pain right now was assessed using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). The 100-mm VAS is a 100-mm line with 1 end marked as "no pain" and the other marked as "pain as bad as it could be." The patient was asked to make a mark on that line indicating his or her level of pain. Pain right now score was defined as the distance (in mm) from the "no pain" end to the patient's mark; 0=no pain and bigger numbers indicate more pain. For screening to week 4, pain right now was assessed 30 minutes before initial BTDS application on day 1; one hour after initial BTDS application on day 1; thereafter, once daily at approximately 8 PM for the first 4 weeks. Baseline was the last assessment prior to the first dose. For weeks 1-4, weekly averages of the pain right now scores were calculated using the sum of all available pain right now scores recorded daily during a given week divided by the number of available scores.

For weeks 6-24, pain right now was measured once a week at approximately 8 PM.

Up to 24 weeks
Parent/Caregiver-assessed Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: End of treatment (week 24) or early discontinuation visit
The PGIC rating score variable was collected on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 to 7 (where 1 = very much improved; and 7 = very much worse). The PGIC is designed to assess overall satisfaction with the treatment. The PGIC score was summarized using the number and percent of patients in each of the 7 possible response categories overall and by age group. PGIC was assessed by the parent/caregiver at the end of treatment visit or early discontinuation visit.
End of treatment (week 24) or early discontinuation visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

March 29, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Buprenorphine transdermal system

3
Subscribe