Bevacizumab Versus Ranibizumab in Treatment of Macular Edema From Vein Occlusion (CRAVE)

October 26, 2017 updated by: Rhonda Weeks, Barnes Retina Institute

Comparison of Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factors Agents in the Treatment of Macular Edema Following Retinal Vein Occlusion

Antagonists of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway are effective in treating macular edema resulting from retinal vein occlusion (RVO). In the eye, the two most widely used anti-VEGF agents are ranibizumab and bevacizumab. Only ranibizumab has been FDA-approved for the treatment of macular edema from RVO, however bevacizumab has been used off-label by many ophthalmologists with good success. Furthermore, the cost of bevacizumab is less than one-tenth the cost of ranibizumab. Here the investigators conduct a six month randomized, prospective interventional trial comparing the effectiveness of ranibizumab with bevacizumab in the treatment of macular edema from RVO. Primary outcome measures are change in central retinal thickness. Secondary measures are change in visual acuity from baseline and change in angiographic properties of macular lesions from baseline after treatment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • The Retina Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • Visual acuity of 20/40 - 20/320 in the study eye (regardless of relative APD)
  • Central foveal thickness (CFT) of > 250 microns as assessed by OCT (see below)
  • Diagnosis of retinal vein occlusion in the past 9 months
  • Age over 50 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of previous intraocular surgery in the study eye, including pars plana vitrectomy (but not including uncomplicated cataract surgery), within 60 days of the screening visit
  • Inability to make study visits
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye (defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥ 25 mmHg) despite treatment with two or more topical pharmacological anti-glaucomatous medication)
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Evidence of any diabetic retinopathy on exam or history of diabetic macular edema within 12 weeks of study onset
  • Any intravitreal injections within 12 weeks of study onset
  • Prior retinal vein occlusion
  • History of pan-retinal photocoagulation within 3 months of study onset or anticipated within 4 months after study onset
  • History of cerebrovascular event or myocardial infarction within 3 months of study onset

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Ranibizumab
0.5 mg per dose, delivered monthly by intravitreal injection for six months
Active Comparator: Bevacizumab
1.25 mg per dose, delivered monthly by intravitreal injection for six months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in central retinal thickness
Time Frame: six months compared to baseline
central thickness is measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT)
six months compared to baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in best-corrected Snellen visual acuity
Time Frame: six months compared to baseline
best-corrected Snellen visual acuity (BCVA) is the best visual acuity measured using a standard Snellen eye chart at 20 feet between (1) uncorrected vision, (2) vision with current eyeglasses or (3) pinholed visual acuity.
six months compared to baseline
change in fluorescein angiogram
Time Frame: six months compared to baseline
fluorescein angiograms will measure area of peripheral nonperfusion. This will be interpreted by a designated physician at each testing center.
six months compared to baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

September 5, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Macular Edema

Clinical Trials on Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab

3
Subscribe