Single Versus Combination Therapy in Acute Tocolysis

September 6, 2011 updated by: Wafa Al Omari, Tawam Hospital

Phase 2 Study of Clinical Utility of Combination Tocolysis in Preterm Labor

The purpose of this study is to compare the tocolytic efficacy, effectiveness and safety of Atosiban in comparison with the combination of Atosiban and Nifedipine together.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Preterm birth, defined as birth at less than 37+0 weeks of gestation, is the most important determinant of adverse infant outcomes. It accounts for 5 to 11% of births in the world, but represents the single largest cause of mortality and morbidity for newborns and a major cause of morbidity for pregnant women. These babies are at increased risk of cerebral palsies, chronic pulmonary insufficiency and other handicaps resulting in suboptimal performance in school and decreased abstractive thinking compared with infants born at term. The economic burden on society in catering for these preterm babies is high. A multi-level modeling of hospital service utilization and cost profile of preterm birth done in 2005 in the United Kingdom, has outlined the huge economic consequences of preterm birth in the first 10 years of life. Furthermore, recent data from Denmark have shown an overall increase in the proportion of preterm deliveries by 22% from 1995 to 2004(from 5.2% to 6.3%). Neonatal mortality has declined, mostly due to improved management of very low birth weight babies rather than prevention of preterm labor (PTL).

The most common treatment used in the management of PTL involves pharmacological inhibition of preterm uterine contractions. Perinatal death and morbidity resulting from PTL are not only strongly related to early gestational age but also to antenatal administration of steroids and transfer to a tertiary care centre in utero or after birth.6 Hence, the choice of tocolytic agent depends on its ability to delay the delivery by at least 48 hours from the time of administration of steroids and preferably longer without maternal or fetal side effects. There is considerable variation in the type of tocolytic agent used in different parts of the world. Single agent tocolysis using ritodrine (β-agonist), atosiban (oxytocin antagonist) or nifedipine (calcium channel blocker) is a common practice. Atosiban has been shown to have comparable effectiveness to β-agonists but with improved side-effect profile similar to that seen in placebo studies. Meta analysis from Cochrane systematic review failed to demonstrate the superiority of atosiban over betamimetics or placebo in terms of tocolytic efficacy or infant outcomes, but, the maternal drug reactions that required treatment cessation were fewer with atosiban. Nifedipine is the only agent associated with improved perinatal outcomes and fewer maternal side-effects than betamimetics. A direct comparison between atosiban and nifedipine has shown that both drugs are equally effective in acute tocolysis, however maternal side-effects were more pronounced with nifedipine.

Due to the differences in their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, one may expect to have improved tocolysis when two agents are combined. In vitro studies have demonstrated that simultaneous blockade of these different pathways could result in an additive or even synergistic effect capable of producing better uterine relaxation than induced by each drug alone. Accordingly, the use of multiple agent therapies has been suggested as a way forward in tocolytic search. In an observational study, combination therapy without serious side effects has been used in the management of PTL at extremely early gestations by Ingemarsson et al.3 However, this was not tested in structured human trials.

The objective of this study was to compare the tocolytic efficacy and safety of the combination of atosiban and nifedipine against the single agent, atosiban in the treatment of PTL.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Abudhabi
      • Al Ain, Abudhabi, United Arab Emirates, 15258
        • Department of obstetrics and Gynecology, Tawam Hospital
      • Al Ain, Abudhabi, United Arab Emirates, 15258
        • Tawam Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 43 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of preterm labour
  • Women with singleton pregnancies

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes
  • Women with any indication for emergency delivery for whom prolongation of pregnancy is contraindicated

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group 1 - Atosiban
Patients on single agent atosiban alone
Atosiban was given as a bolus (6.7 mg. IV) over 1 min then an infusion of 18 mg/hr for 3 hrs followed by 6 mg/hr for 48 hrs.
Other Names:
  • Tractocile
Experimental: Group 2
Patients on combination of atosiban and nifedipine
This group were given simultaneously as follows:Atosiban was given as a bolus (6.7 mg. IV) over 1 min then an infusion of 18 mg/hr for 3 hrs followed by 6 mg/hr for 48 hrs.Nifedipine was given in the dose of 10 mg orally every 15 min till uterine quiescence was achieved (<4 contractions/hr). Maximum dose was 40 mg in the first hour then maintenance dose of 10 mg every 4-6 h for 48 hrs was given.
Other Names:
  • Tractocile and nifedipine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of pregnancy, an expected average of 10 weeks
Safety was assessed by maternal, fetal and neonatal adverse events. Particular emphasis was placed on serious adverse cardiovascular events, including cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest, admission to intensive care unit and death were assessed as serious maternal outcomes and perinatal complications were recorded by neonatal morbidity and mortality until discharge from the hospital
Participants will be followed for the duration of pregnancy, an expected average of 10 weeks
Number of women undelivered 48 hrs and seven days of initiation of therapy
Time Frame: Participants who are not delivered within seven days of initiation of therapy
Tocolytic efficacy was assessed in terms of the proportion of women undelivered 48 hrs and seven days of initiation of therapy without the need for rescue tocolysis.
Participants who are not delivered within seven days of initiation of therapy
Number of Babies with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 weeks
Safety was assessed by maternal, fetal and neonatal adverse events. Perinatal complications were recorded by neonatal morbidity and mortality until discharge from the hospital
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prolongation of pregnancy
Time Frame: Assessed till the date of delivery, an expected average of 10 weeks
Assessed till the date of delivery, an expected average of 10 weeks
Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission
Time Frame: Till the time of discharge, an expected avearge of 7 weeks
Number of neonates who are needing NICU admission after delivery.
Till the time of discharge, an expected avearge of 7 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wafa R AlOmari, Tawam Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

September 7, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 7, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2011

Last Verified

September 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Preterm Labour

Clinical Trials on Atosiban

3
Subscribe