- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01477229
Quality of Life in RECTal Cancer - a Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study (QoLiRECT)
Quality of Life in RECTal Cancer - A Study Within the Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Rectal cancer is more frequent in men than in women and is relatively uncommon before the age of 50. The prognosis for rectal cancer has improved over the last decades2. Almost 60% of all patients survive more than five years, and because of advances in early detection and treatment, this number is expected to increase in the future1. Treatment of rectal cancer varies depending on the stage of the disease at diagnosis. For some patients, operation is the only treatment. For others, surgery is combined with radiotherapy, chemotherapy or both. The two most common operative procedures are the sphincter-preserving anterior resection (AR) and the abdominoperineal resection (APR) - the latter results in a permanent colostomy. Patients with generalised disease at diagnosis receive palliative treatment, which may include chemotherapy and radiotherapy as well as surgery.
Rectal cancer comes with a high risk of local recurrence, i.e. return of the tumour within the pelvis after a presumed curative resection. Local recurrence is difficult to treat and often very painful and distressing for the patient. Some local recurrences will be candidates for second line surgery, as is also true for some distant metastases.
The aim of the QoLiRECT study is to increase the knowledge about symptoms, functional impairments, quality of life (QoL) and psychological and socioeconomic burden in an unselected population of rectal cancer patients. Symptoms such as incontinence, pain, fatigue and impaired sexual function3 are common with this disease. Bodily changes, caused by the treatment or the disease itself, may lead to functional impairments and psychological, social, emotional and economical restraints. Conventional outcome measures such as morbidity and survival reveal little about these things.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Gothenburg, Sweden, 416 85
- Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, SSORG, Göteborg
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients presenting at the participating hospitals with newly diagnosed rectal cancer, regardless of stage at diagnosis and plans for treatment, will be eligible for inclusion.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age below 18 years at diagnosis.
- No informed consent received or withdrawal of informed consent.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
Abdominoperineal resection
Patients with low rectal cancers
|
Anterior resection
Patients where it is possible to perform an anterior resection
|
Preoperative chemo-radiation treatment
Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
|
Palliative treatment
Patients with systemic disease
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
To describe QoL, symptoms and functional impairments in an unselected population of rectal cancer patients
Time Frame: At diagnosis
|
It will be evaluated at diagnosis, , i.e. at presentation of a plan for the treatment, at 12 months after start of the treatment, regardless of which, at 24 months after start of the treatment and at 60 months after start of the treatment
|
At diagnosis
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
To explore potential differences in QoL, symptoms and functional impairments between subgroups of the population
Time Frame: At diagnosis
|
and at 12 months, 36 months and 60 monts after diagnosis
|
At diagnosis
|
To identify symptoms and functional impairments and other risk factors that have great impact on QoL
Time Frame: At diagnosis
|
will also be assessed at 12 months after start of the treatment, regardless of which, at 24 months after start of the treatment and at 60 months after start of the treatment
|
At diagnosis
|
To identify patient and environmental factors with an impact on QoL
Time Frame: At diagnosis
|
and at 12 months after start of the treatment, regardless of which, at 24 months after start of the treatment and at 60 months after start of the treatment
|
At diagnosis
|
To analyse how clinical factors like oncologic result of operation, morbidity, recurrence and survival influence QoL
Time Frame: At 12 months after start of the treatment
|
This will be analyzed regardless of which, at 24 months after start of the treatment and at 60 months after start of the treatment
|
At 12 months after start of the treatment
|
To initiate interventional studies when appropriate
Time Frame: 12 months
|
May be another time frame than the one registered.
Depends on results from the QoL questionnaire
|
12 months
|
To generate basic descriptive data of the rectal cancer patient population: demography, socioeconomic data, disease stage at diagnosis, fashion of treatment, recurrence, survival
Time Frame: At diagnosis
|
At diagnosis
|
|
To analyse health economy aspects of QoL and morbidity in the patient population
Time Frame: At diagnosis
|
and at 12 months after start of the treatment, regardless of which, at 24 months after start of the treatment and at 60 months after start of the treatment
|
At diagnosis
|
To explore the presence and impact of intrusive thoughts on QoL
Time Frame: At 12 months
|
May be analyzed both at 24 and 60 months as well
|
At 12 months
|
QoL in an unselected population of rectal cancer patients
Time Frame: at 12 months
|
at 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Eva Angenete, M.D., Ph.D., SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group and Sahlgrenska University Hospital in collaboration with Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- QoLiRECT
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Life
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownImproving Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Children's National Research InstituteRecruitingProfessional Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliUniversity of BolognaActive, not recruitingImprove Quality of LifeItaly
-
B. Braun Medical SAUnknownQuality of Life of Colostomized Patient
-
Mattu UniversityCompletedBreif Description: Patients' Quality of Life ofEthiopia
-
University of South CarolinaNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)RecruitingHealth Related Quality of LifeUnited States
-
PharmanexSprim Advanced Life SciencesCompletedHealth-related Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Linkoeping UniversityRecruiting
-
South Valley UniversityActive, not recruitingDeterminants of Health-related Quality of Life for Patients After Renal Lithotripsy: PNL Versus RIRSHealth Related Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Region VästmanlandUnknownHealth Related Quality of Life