Study of the ConforMIS iDuo(R) G2

October 23, 2023 updated by: Restor3D

A Prospective, Multicenter Study of the ConforMIS iDuo(R) G2 Bicompartmental Knee Repair System

To evaluate the ConforMIS iDuo G2 implant

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, multicenter study. The investigators will be evaluating the ConforMIS iDuo G2 implant.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • New Castle, Indiana, United States, 47362
        • Forest Ridge Medical Pavilion
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70121
        • Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute
    • Vermont
      • Morrisville, Vermont, United States, 05661
        • Mansfield Orthopaedics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients presenting this specific form of osteoarthritis at participating sites with IRB approval.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinical condition included in the approved Indications For Use for the iDuo® G2
  2. Bicompartmental osteoarthritis defined as Medial and patellofemoral osteoarthritis, or Lateral and patellofemoral arthritis as confirmed by the investigator's assessment of disease status at screening visit. Disease status is assessed by Clinical and Radiographic assessment. In addition, CT arthrogram assessment may be utilized for diagnosis.
  3. Willingness to participate in the clinical study, to give informed consent and to attend all follow-up visits
  4. > 18 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. BMI > 40
  2. Active malignancy (defined as a history of any invasive malignancy - except non-melanoma skin cancer), unless patient has been treated with curative intent and there have been no clinical signs or symptoms of the malignancy for at least 5 years
  3. Poorly controlled diabetes
  4. Neuromuscular conditions which prevent patient from participating in study activities
  5. Active local or systemic infection
  6. Immunocompromised
  7. Fibromyalgia or other general body pain related condition
  8. Rheumatoid arthritis or other forms of inflammatory joint disease
  9. Loss of bone or musculature, osteonecrosis, neuromuscular or vascular compromise in the area of the joint to be operated to an extent that the procedure is unjustified
  10. Diagnosed or receiving treatment for Osteoporosis
  11. Other physical disability affecting the hips, spine, or contralateral knee
  12. Severe instability due to advanced loss of osteochondral structure
  13. Prior arthroplasty of the affected knee
  14. Compromised ACL, PCL or collateral ligament
  15. Severe fixed valgus or varus deformity of >15º
  16. Extensor lag > 15 º
  17. Fixed flexion contracture ≥ 10 º
  18. Prior history of failed implant surgery of the joint to be treated, including high tibial osteotomy (HTO)
  19. Unwilling or unable to comply with study requirements
  20. Participation in another clinical study which would confound results
  21. If during intra-op, it is noted that the patient has tri-compartmental disease, then the patient is considered a screen fail

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
iDuo G2
iDuo G2 to be implanted in the patient.
single comparator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain and function
Time Frame: 3 months
By using questionnaires, we will look at pain and function scores at this time point
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain and function at follow up time points
Time Frame: 1, 2, 5 and 10 years post implant
By using questionnaires, we will look at pain and function scores at these time points
1, 2, 5 and 10 years post implant
Revision rates
Time Frame: Patient will be observed for 10 years post implant
Capture revision rates
Patient will be observed for 10 years post implant
Incidence of major procedure related and device related complications
Time Frame: Patient will be observed for 10 years post implant
To capture any procedure or device related complications
Patient will be observed for 10 years post implant
Post operative limb alignment
Time Frame: X rays will be taken at 1 year, 2 year, 5 year and 10 year follow ups
X rays will be taken at 1 year, 2 year, 5 year and 10 year follow ups
Radiographic implant position
Time Frame: X rays will be taken at 1 year, 2 year, 5 year and 10 year follow ups
X rays will be taken at 1 year, 2 year, 5 year and 10 year follow ups
Radiographic loosening, radiolucencies
Time Frame: X rays will be taken at 1 year, 2 year, 5 year and 10 year follow ups
X rays will be taken at 1 year, 2 year, 5 year and 10 year follow ups
Length of procedure
Time Frame: Day of surgery
Timing from skin to cement
Day of surgery
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Patient will be followed from admission to discharge with an average of about 5 days
measure length of stay from admission to discharge
Patient will be followed from admission to discharge with an average of about 5 days
Blood loss during surgery
Time Frame: Day of surgery
Day of surgery
Intraoperative blood replacement volume
Time Frame: Day of surgery
Day of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: L Rolston, MD, Forest Ridge

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 18, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2012

First Posted (Estimated)

March 28, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bicompartmental Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on iDuo G2

3
Subscribe