- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01587833
WEUKBRE5559: IMI PROTECT: Benzodiazepines & Fracture
WEUKBRE5559: IMI PROTECT (Work Package 2): Use of Benzodiazepines and Risk of Hip/Femur Fracture
The studies described in this protocol are all performed within the framework of PROTECT (Pharmacoepidemiological Research on Outcomes of Therapeutics by a European ConsorTium) Workpackage 2 and Workgroup 1. Primary aim of these studies is to develop, test and disseminate methodological standards for the design, conduct and analysis of Pharmacoepidemiological (PE) studies applicable to different safety issues and using different data sources. To achieve this, results from PE studies on five key adverse events (AEs) performed in different databases will be evaluated. Therefore, emphasis will be on the methodological aspects of the studies in this protocol and not on the clinical consequences of the association under investigation.
Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are one of the therapeutic groups most widely used, mainly indicated as hypnotics and anxiolytics. Guidelines recommend treatment courses not exceeding 4-6 weeks. However, long-term treatment is highly prevalent, particularly in older people with a prevalence ranging from 15 to 30%. However, treatment is often taken as needed.
Hip/femur fractures are a major cause of morbidity and mortality, impair quality of life and impose a considerable economic burden. Among people aged 50 years and older, a case-fatality rate of 20% is associated within the first year.
The relationship between benzodiazepines and hip fractures remains controversial. Psychotropic medication has been traditionally associated with hip fractures. Among psychotropic medication, long elimination half-life benzodiazepines were found to increase the risk of hip fractures in a case-control study published in the late eighties. Since then, several investigations have been performed, mostly in older patients focusing on the relationship between benzodiazepines and hip fractures, and between benzodiazepines and falls as a mechanism underlying this effect. A review performed in 2003, which included 11 epidemiological studies, reported that results were not always consistent. Seven out of eight cohort and population based case-control studies, found an association, but different results were reported according to benzodiazepines' half-life. In four hospital-based case-control studies no association between benzodiazepines use and hip fracture has been described. Data on dosing was only included in three of the studies, and once more results were not conclusive. Results ranged from no effect to an increased risk with high dose regimens. Results from subsequent succeeding studies have also shown contradictions, with no association reported in one of the studies, and an association described for the short-term use of short half-life, high-potency benzodiazepines.
Even though there is epidemiological evidence suggesting that the use of benzodiazepines increases the risk of hip fractures, problems rise with the definition of benzodiazepine exposure, or biases such as confounding by indication and the control for confounders. These remain unresolved topics that should be addressed in future studies. In the present protocol, it is proposed to further asses the risk of hip/femur fractures associated with benzodiazepines using different study designs in different primary databases, and to compare the results in order to evaluate the impact of design and population differences on the outcome of the study association.
The objective of this study is to assess the association between benzodiazepines use and hip/femur fracture with different study designs (descriptive, cohort, nested case-control, case crossover and self control case series) across different primary care databases (Bavarian, Mondriaan, National Databases (Denmark), General Practice Research Database (GPRD), Base de Datos para la Investigación Farmacoepidemiologica en Atencion Primaria (BIFAP) and The Health Improvement Network (THIN)) and to compare the results between databases, across designs to evaluate the impact of design/database/population differences on the outcome of the studied association.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients who have at least one year of enrolment with the GP
- All patients who are at least 18 years of age
- All patients who have at least one benzodiazepine prescription
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a benzodiazepine prescription within 6 months prior to study start
- Patients less than 18 years of age
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Patients with a diagnosis of hip or femur fracture
All patients of the study population with a record/diagnosis of a first fracture of the hip or femur during the study period regardless of whether they have a history of past fractures.
When the patient has a history of hip or hip/femur fracture, a minimum of 12 months should have elapsed between the two episodes for a current fracture to be considered a new event.
|
BZD prescription during the study period between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2009
|
Patients without a diagnosis of hip or femur fracture
All patients of the study population without a record/diagnosis of a fracture of the hip or femur during the study period
|
BZD prescription during the study period between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2009
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Incident hip/femur fracture defined by ICPE-2 codes in BIFAP/Mondriaan, Read codes in GPRD/THIN and ICD-10 codes in Bavarian database
Time Frame: Up to nine years following drug exposure
|
Up to nine years following drug exposure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 116440
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anxiety Disorders
-
Prisma Health-UpstateCompletedAnxiety | Anxiety, Separation | Separation Anxiety | Anxiety Generalized
-
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoUniversity of California, Los Angeles; University of CincinnatiRecruitingAnxiety, Separation | Anxiety, Social | Anxiety, GeneralizedUnited States
-
AstraZenecaCompletedAnxiety Disorders | Anxiety | Anxiety Neuroses | Anxiety StatesUnited States
-
Loyola UniversityCompletedAnxiety | Anxiety State | Procedural AnxietyUnited States
-
Nazife Begüm KARANCompletedDental Anxiety | Sedative; Anxiety DisorderTurkey
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyCompletedAnxiety Neuroses | Anxiety States, Neurotic | Neuroses, AnxietyUnited States, Mexico, South Africa
-
West University of TimisoaraUnknownAnxiety Disorder/Anxiety StateRomania
-
Dr. Nazanin AlaviActive, not recruitingGeneralized Anxiety Disorder | AnxietyCanada
-
ProofPilotFisher WallaceActive, not recruitingGeneralized Anxiety Disorder | Anxiety | Generalized AnxietyUnited States
-
Loma Linda UniversityCompletedParental/Caregiver Anxiety | Child's AnxietyUnited States