- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01601301
Post-Market Study of the Ellipse PRECICE Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System (PINS)
January 31, 2018 updated by: Ellipse Technologies, Inc.
A Post-Market Prospective Evaluation of the Performance and Safety of the Ellipse PRECICE Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System
The purpose of this study is to obtain post market performance and safety data of the Ellipse PRECICE Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System for subjects undergoing unilateral limb lengthening.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Subject data will be reviewed at the following visits:
- Preoperative
- Operative
- Every 7 to 14 days through Distraction Phase
- Every 4 to 6 weeks through Consolidation Phase
- 6-Month Post-Consolidation
- 12-Month Post-Consolidation
- 18-Month Post-Consolidation
- 24-Month Post-Consolidation
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
32
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Loma Linda, California, United States, 92350
- Loma Linda University
-
-
Florida
-
Orlando, Florida, United States, 32827
- Nemours Children's Hospital
-
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33407
- Paley Advanced Limb Lengthening Institute
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21215
- Sinai Hospital of Baltimore
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10021
- Hospital for Special Surgery
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- ADULT
- OLDER_ADULT
- CHILD
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Leg length discrepancy ≥ 1.5 cm and ≤ 6.5 cm due to short femur or tibia
- Weight ≤ 114 kg if implanted with the 10.7 mm or 12.5 mm diameter nail, or ≤ 57 kg if implanted with the 8.5 mm diameter nail
- Skeletally mature
- Intramedullary canal without offset
- Tibia or femur sufficient to contain the implant
- Availability, willingness, and sufficient cognitive awareness to comply with protocol procedures and schedule
- Must sign informed consent to permit the use of personal health data
Exclusion Criteria:
- Active infection or previous history of deep infection in the involved bone
- Metal allergies or sensitivities to the components of the device
- Distance from the nearest convenient external surface of the treated limb to the intramedullary canal > 38 mm for the 8.5 mm PRECICE nail, > 51 mm for the 10.7 mm PRECICE nail, or > 76 mm for the 12.5 mm PRECICE nail
- Significant range of motion deficit of the adjacent joints
- Patients with a pacemaker, implanted cardiac defibrillator, or any other electronic or magnetic implant
- Patients who require an MRI during implantation
- Non-union
- Impassable or obstructed intramedullary canal
- Significant angular deformity that prevents device placement
- Cannot bear weight on the contralateral limb
- Procedural osteotomy cannot be made in an appropriate location
- Deformities that require multilevel osteotomies or bi-lateral implantation at the time of study index surgery
- Systemic bone disease
- Pregnant or nursing women
- Inadequate vascularity or evidence of vascular disease or peripheral neuropathy
- Malignancies or tumors in the involved bone
- Patient is a drug abuser
- Open wounds or ulcers that could compromise treatment
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NA
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: PRECICE System
|
Lenthening of either the tibia or femur with the PRECICE System.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Distraction Control: actual distraction rate vs. target distraction rate
Time Frame: Postoperatively, every 7-10 days up until the subject's distraction regimen is complete, an expected average of 33 days
|
Postoperatively, every 7-10 days up until the subject's distraction regimen is complete, an expected average of 33 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Bone Union
Time Frame: Following completion of the subject's distraction regimen, every 4-6 weeks until the subject's treated limb is evaluated as consolidated, an expected average of 66 days
|
Following completion of the subject's distraction regimen, every 4-6 weeks until the subject's treated limb is evaluated as consolidated, an expected average of 66 days
|
|
Pain
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post-consolidation of the treated limb, an expected total average of 29 months
|
Pain measured by the SF-36v2, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Lower Limb Outcomes Questionnaire, and medication use.
|
Up to 24 months post-consolidation of the treated limb, an expected total average of 29 months
|
Healing Index
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post-consolidation of the treated limb, an expected total average of 29 months
|
The total treatment period with the PRECICE System in situ, divided by the length of bone growth in centimeters.
|
Up to 24 months post-consolidation of the treated limb, an expected total average of 29 months
|
Number of days to complete lengthening
Time Frame: Postoperatively, every 7-10 days up until the subject's distraction regimen is complete, an expected average of 33 days
|
Postoperatively, every 7-10 days up until the subject's distraction regimen is complete, an expected average of 33 days
|
|
Number of days to complete full weight bearing
Time Frame: Up to an expected average of 99 days.
|
Up to an expected average of 99 days.
|
|
Number of days to full consolidation
Time Frame: Following completion of the subject's distraction regimen, every 4-6 weeks until the subject's treated limb is evaluated as consolidated, an expected average of 66 days
|
Following completion of the subject's distraction regimen, every 4-6 weeks until the subject's treated limb is evaluated as consolidated, an expected average of 66 days
|
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post-consolidation of the treated limb, an expected total average of 29 months
|
Up to 24 months post-consolidation of the treated limb, an expected total average of 29 months
|
|
Device-related complications
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post-consolidation of the treated limb, an expected total average of 29 months
|
Up to 24 months post-consolidation of the treated limb, an expected total average of 29 months
|
|
Procedure-related complications
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post-consolidation of the treated limb, an expected total average of 29 months
|
Up to 24 months post-consolidation of the treated limb, an expected total average of 29 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Stuart A Green, MD, University of California, Irvine
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
July 1, 2012
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
June 1, 2018
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
June 1, 2018
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 17, 2012
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
May 18, 2012
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
February 5, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 31, 2018
Last Verified
January 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- PR0035
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Limb Length Discrepancy
-
University of FloridaActive, not recruitingBiomechanics | Limb Length DiscrepancyUnited States
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceUnknownLimb Length DiscrepancyFrance
-
Ziv Medical CenterCompletedLimb Length Discrepancy | Total Hip
-
Aliaa Rehan YoussefCompletedBone Deformity | Limb Length DiscrepancyEgypt
-
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanUnknownLeg Length Discrepancy, Shoe Lifts
-
University College, LondonUnknownLeg Length Discrepancy | Leg Length DifferenceUnited Kingdom
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkThe Hospital for Sick Children; Boston Children's HospitalRecruitingLeg Length DiscrepancyUnited States, Canada
-
Orthofix s.r.l.CompletedJoint Diseases | Genu Varum | Genu Valgum | Knee Deformity | Ankle Deformity | Length Inequality, Leg | Discrepancy Length; Congenital | Deformity of LimbItaly
-
Sundsvall HospitalCompletedOsteoarthritis | Hip Arthroplasty | Leg Length Difference
-
National Taiwan University HospitalNational Science Council, TaiwanCompletedScoliosis | Leg Length DiscrepancyTaiwan
Clinical Trials on PRECICE System
-
ResMedCompleted
-
Federal University of São PauloCompletedAdverse Reaction to Systemic AgentsBrazil
-
KineticureCompletedOsteoarthritis | Knee PainUnited States
-
Smith & Nephew, Inc.CompletedDiabetic Foot Ulcers | Venous Leg UlcersUnited States, Canada
-
Molnlycke Health Care ABCompletedEvaluation of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in the Treatment of DFUs Incl. Post Amputation Wounds.Diabetes | Foot UlcersUnited Kingdom
-
Zahedan University of Medical SciencesUnknownPain, Postoperative Pain Pathologic Processes Postoperative Complications Signs and Symptoms
-
University of British ColumbiaNot yet recruitingPersistent Developmental Stutter | Childhood-Onset Fluency Disorder (Stuttering)
-
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and...Recruiting