Is the Use of Blood Platelets Effective in the Treatment of Difficult Fistulas Related to the Anal Sphincter?

August 21, 2012 updated by: Maastricht University Medical Center

Use of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) as an Adjunct in the Treatment of High Peri-anal Fistulas.

Rationale:

Closure of the internal opening is the most accepted standard procedure in the treatment of peri-anal fistulas. The mucosal advancement flap is considered as golden standard. In one out of the three patients mucosal flap repair fails. Possible causal factors are incomplete clearance of pus and debris, incomplete closure of the internal opening, inappropriate host response in patients with risk factors like smoking or diabetes. Platelet derived growth factors may facilitate closure of the internal opening, especially in patients with impaired wound healing.

Objective:

The use of autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) as an adjunct to the staged mucosal advancement flap to achieve a better closure rate of complex peri-anal fistula's.

Study design:

Randomized, multicenter trial.

Study population:

Patients with complex cryptoglandular peri-anal fistula's.

Intervention:

Injection of PRP in the curretted fistula track under the mucosal flap.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

  • Recurrence rate
  • Post-operative pain
  • Continence
  • Quality of life.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, group relatedness:

Because autologous blood is used, no extra risk are expected.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Groningen
      • Stadskanaal, Groningen, Netherlands, 9501 HE
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Refaja ziekenhuis
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Stephan J. van der Hagen, MD, PhD
    • Limburg
      • Heerlen, Limburg, Netherlands, 6419 PC
        • Recruiting
        • Atrium medisch centrum
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Wim G. van Gemert, MD, PhD
      • Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands, 6229 HX
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Maastricht
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Stephanie O. Breukink, MD, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kevin W.A. Göttgens, MD
      • Roermond, Limburg, Netherlands, 6043 CV
        • Recruiting
        • Laurentius Ziekenhuis
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jeroen Heemskerk, MD, PhD
    • Noord Brabant
      • Breda, Noord Brabant, Netherlands, 4819 EV
        • Withdrawn
        • Amphia Ziekenhuis
      • Eindhoven, Noord Brabant, Netherlands, 5623 EJ
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Catharina Ziekenhuis
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • J.P. de Zoete, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Complex peri-anal fistula.
  • Able to understand informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Local malignancy
  • Crohn's disease or Ulcerative colitis
  • Traumatic or iatrogenic lesion
  • Thrombocytopenia
  • Splenomegaly
  • Bleeding disorders
  • Hematologic malignancies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Mucosa advancement flap
Mucosa advancement flap will be performed at the starting point of the fistula in the rectum
Experimental: Mucosa advancement flap + PRP
Platelet rich plasma added to the mucosa advancement flap
Mucosa advancement flap will be performed at the starting point of the fistula in the rectum

The PRP will be injected into the fistula, after the mucosa advancement flap was created.

For the PRP we will need to take 55 millilitres of blood of the patient. This blood will be centrifuged into PRP.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence of fistulas
Time Frame: Assessed up to 104 weeks after operation

The surgeon or docter in the outpatient clinic will decide if there is a recurrent fistula or not.

In case of doubt a MRI will be made.

Assessed up to 104 weeks after operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain
Time Frame: Assessed at 2 weeks after operation
Measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS-score)
Assessed at 2 weeks after operation
Quality of Life
Time Frame: Assessed at 2 weeks after operation
Measured using the SF-36v2 questionnaire
Assessed at 2 weeks after operation
Incontinence
Time Frame: Assessed at 2 weeks after operation
Measured using the Vaizey score
Assessed at 2 weeks after operation
Pain
Time Frame: Assessed at 4 weeks after operation
Measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS-score)
Assessed at 4 weeks after operation
Pain
Time Frame: Assessed at 16 weeks after operation
Measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS-score)
Assessed at 16 weeks after operation
Pain
Time Frame: Assessed at 24 weeks after operation
Measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS-score)
Assessed at 24 weeks after operation
Pain
Time Frame: Assessed at 52 weeks after operation
Measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS-score)
Assessed at 52 weeks after operation
Pain
Time Frame: Assessed at 104 weeks after operation
Measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS-score)
Assessed at 104 weeks after operation
Quality of life
Time Frame: Assessed at 4 weeks after operation
Measured using the SF-36v2 questionnaire
Assessed at 4 weeks after operation
Quality of Life
Time Frame: Assessed at 16 weeks after operation
Measured using the SF-36v2 questionnaire
Assessed at 16 weeks after operation
Quality of life
Time Frame: Assessed at 24 weeks after operation
Measured using the SF-36v2 questionnaire
Assessed at 24 weeks after operation
Quality of life
Time Frame: Assessed at 52 weeks after operation
Measured using the SF-36v2 questionnaire
Assessed at 52 weeks after operation
Quality of life
Time Frame: Assessed at 104 weeks after operation
Measured using the SF-36v2 questionnaire
Assessed at 104 weeks after operation
Incontinence
Time Frame: Assesed at 4 weeks after operation
Measured using the Vaizey score
Assesed at 4 weeks after operation
Incontinence
Time Frame: Assessed at 16 weeks after operation
Measured using the Vaizey score
Assessed at 16 weeks after operation
Incontinence
Time Frame: Assessed at 52 weeks after operation
Measured using the Vaizey score
Assessed at 52 weeks after operation
Incontinence
Time Frame: Assessed at 24 weeks after operation
Measured using the Vaizey score
Assessed at 24 weeks after operation
Incontinence
Time Frame: Assessed at 104 weeks after operation
Measured using the Vaizey score
Assessed at 104 weeks after operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stephanie O. Breukink, MD, PhD, Maastricht University Medical Center
  • Study Director: Cor G.M.I. Baeten, MD, PhD, Prof., Maastricht University Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 8, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 22, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2012

Last Verified

August 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Fistula

Clinical Trials on Mucosa advancement flap

3
Subscribe