A Placebo- and Ropinirole-Controlled Study for SPM 962 in Advanced Parkinson's Disease Patients

April 23, 2014 updated by: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

A Double-Blind, 3-Arm, Parallel Group, Placebo- and Ropinirole-Controlled Study for SPM 962 in Advanced Parkinson's Disease Patients With Concomitant Treatment of L-dopa

  • To demonstrate the non-inferiority of SPM 962 to ropinirole in terms of efficacy in order to confirm clinical value of SPM 962.
  • To demonstrate the superiority of SPM 962 to placebo in terms of efficacy.
  • To investigate the tolerability and safety of SPM 962 up to 36.0 mg/day.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

420

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chubu Region, Japan
      • Chugoku Region, Japan
      • Hokkaido Region, Japan
      • Kanto Region, Japan
      • Kinki Region, Japan
      • Kyushu Region, Japan
      • Shikoku Region, Japan
      • Tohoku Region, Japan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 79 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject diagnosed as having Parkinson's disease in accordance with "Diagnostic Criteria established by the Research Committee of MHLW-specified Intractable Neurodegenerative Diseases (1995)".
  • Subject is 30 and more and less than 80 years of age at the time of informed consent.
  • Hoehn & Yahr stage 2-4 (on time).
  • Total UPDRS Part 3 score is over 10 at screening test (on time).
  • Subject is on a stable dose of L-dopa with no change in daily dose or dosing regimen for at least 28 days prior to the initial treatment of SPM 962.
  • Subject has any of the following problematic symptoms; 1) Wearing off phenomenon (including frozen gait at off time and dystonia at off time) 2) On and off phenomenon 3) Delayed-on and/or No-on phenomenon 4) Dyskinesia 5) Not well controlled with L-dopa.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject who has previously participated in a clinical trial of SPM962 and taken the investigational product (IP).
  • Subject has psychiatric symptoms, e.g. confusion, hallucination, delusion, excitation, delirium, abnormal behavior at screening test or baseline.
  • Subject whose SBP declines by at least 30 mmHg from supine to standing position based on the orthostatic hypotension assessment, or subject who develops orthostatic hypotension at baseline.
  • Subject has a history of epilepsy, convulsion and other.
  • Subject who has complications or a history of serious cardiac diseases or arrhythmia (eg, congestive heart failure of class 3 or 4 in the NYHA classification, second or third degree atrioventricular block, complete left bundle branch block, sick sinus syndrome, ventricular fibrillation, myocardial infarction within 12 months prior to the screening test, or a complication of angina pectoris).
  • Subjects has QTc-interval >450 msec twice at screening. Subject has a the average QTc-interval from two ECGs >450 msec in males and >470 msec in females at baseline.
  • Subject has congenital long QT syndrome.
  • Subject whose serum potassium level is < 3.5mEq/L at the screening test.
  • Subject has a total bilirubin >= 3.0 mg/dL or AST(GOT) or ALT(GPT) greater than 2.5 times of the upper limit of the reference range (or >= 100 IU/L) at screening test, or suffers complications of active phase of chronic hepatitis or liver cirrhosis.
  • Subject has BUN >= 30 mg/dL or serum creatinine >= 2.0 mg/dl at screening test.
  • Subject has a history of allergic reaction to topical agents such as transdermal patch.
  • Subject has a history of known intolerance/hypersensitivity to ropinirole and/or adverse drug reactions that prevent subject from receiving treatment.
  • Subject is pregnant or nursing or woman who plans pregnancy during the trial.
  • Subject is receiving therapy with prohibited drug specified in the study protocol.
  • Subject has a history of pallidotomy, thalamotomy, deep brain stimulation or fetal tissue transplant.
  • Subject has dementia, including DLB and PDD (MMSE score <= 24 at screening).
  • Subject who has a complication or history of malignant neoplastic disease, or received treatment for the disease within 12 months prior to the screening test.
  • Subject is unable to give consent.
  • Subject who is unable to properly record information in a diary.
  • Subject is participating in another trial of IPs or received other IPs within 12 weeks prior to commencement of study treatment.
  • Investigator judges that subject is inappropriate as a study subject with other reasons.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SPM 962
SPM 962 transdermal patch
SPM 962 transdermal patch once a daily up to 36.0 mg/day
Active Comparator: Ropinirole
Ropinirole tablet
Ropinirole oral administration TID up to 15.0 mg/day
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
SPM962 placebo patch and Ropinirole placebo tab
SPM962-placebo patch and Ropinirole-placebo tab

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Score (UPDRS) Part 3 Sum Score
Time Frame: baseline, 16 weeks after dosing

Mean change (LOCF) from baseline in UPDRS Part 3 sum score (on state) at 16 weeks after dosing.

UPDRS is a scale for monitoring Parkinson's Disease-related disability and impairment. The UPDRS consists of the following four sub-scales. Part 1: Mentation, Part 2: Activities of Daily Living, Part 3: Motor, Part 4: Complications. Part 3 assesses 14 items. Each item is scored from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). The sum score serves as the sub-scale score. A higher score indicates a greater severity of symptoms. Thus a decrease in the scores means improvement.

baseline, 16 weeks after dosing

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
UPDRS Part 3 Sum Score
Time Frame: baseline, 8 and 10 weeks after dosing

Mean change (LOCF) from baseline in UPDRS Part 3 sum score (on state) at 8 and 10 weeks after dosing.

UPDRS Part 3 assesses 14 items. Each item is scored from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). The sum score serves as the sub-scale score. A higher score indicates a greater severity of symptoms. Thus a decrease in the scores means improvement.

baseline, 8 and 10 weeks after dosing
UPDRS Part 2 Sum Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing

Mean change (LOCF) from baseline in UPDRS Part 2 sum score (average scores of on state and off state) at 16 weeks after dosing.

UPDRS 2 assesses 13 items. Each item is scored from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). The sum score serves as the sub-scale score. A higher score indicates a greater severity of symptoms. Thus a decrease in the scores means improvement.

Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing
Off Time
Time Frame: Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing
Mean change (LOCF) from baseline in off time at 16 weeks after dosing. Off-time is a state where L-Dopa becomes ineffective. Off-time was measured by patient diary in hours/day.
Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing
Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-2 (PDSS-2)
Time Frame: Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing
Mean change (LOCF) from baseline in PDSS-2 sum score at 16 weeks after dosing. PDSS-2 is a scale for assessing sleep disorders in Parkinson's disease. PDSS consists of 15 questions about sleep and nocturnal disturbances. The score of each question ranges from 0 (never) to 4 (very frequent). The sum of each question serves as the scale score. Thus a decrease in the scores means improvement.
Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing
On Time
Time Frame: Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing
Mean change (LOCF) from baseline in on time at 16 weeks after dosing. On-time is a state where L-Dopa is effective. On-time was measured by patient diary in hours/day.
Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing
On Time Without Dyskinesia Disturbing Daily Activities
Time Frame: Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing

Mean change (LOCF) from baseline in on time without dyskinesia disturbing daily activities at 16 weeks after dosing.

On-time is a state where L-Dopa is effective. On-time was measured by patient diary in hours/day.

Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing
On Time With Dyskinesia Disturbing Daily Activities
Time Frame: Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing
Mean change (LOCF) from baseline in on time with dyskinesia disturbing daily activities at 16 weeks after dosing (rate against on time).
Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing
Effective Rate in UPDRS Part 3 Sum Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing
Effective rate (percentage of subjects with 20% or 30% decrease) (LOCF) in UPDRS Part 3 sum score (on state) at 16 weeks after dosing.
Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing
Effective Rate in UPDRS Part 2 Sum Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing
Effective rate (percentage of subjects with 20% or 30% decrease) (LOCF) in UPDRS Part 2 sum score (average scores of on state and off state) at 16 weeks after dosing.
Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing
Effective Rate in Off Time
Time Frame: Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing

Effective rate (percentage of subjects with 20% or 30% decrease) (LOCF) in off time at 16 weeks after dosing.

On-time is a state where L-Dopa is effective. On-time was measured by patient diary in hours/day.

Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing
Clinical Global Impression (CGI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing

Change (LOCF) from baseline in CGI score. CGI improvement is a clinician-reported scale for assessing how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened from baseline.

The scale scoring criteria are 1: very much improved, 2: much improved, 3: minimally improved, 4: no change, 5: minimally worse, 6: much worse, 7: very much worse. A decrease in the scores means improvement.

Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing
Dystonia (at an Early Hour)
Time Frame: Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing
Change (LOCF) from baseline in occurrence of Dystonia (at an early hour).
Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing
Dystonia (in the Daytime)
Time Frame: Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing
Change (LOCF) from baseline in occurrence of Dystonia (in the daytime).
Baseline, 16 weeks after dosing

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 27, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 23, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2014

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on SPM 962

3
Subscribe