Stretta In Reflux Uncontrolled by IPP (SIRUP)

January 28, 2019 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Stretta In Reflux Uncontrolled by Intake of Inhibitors of Protons Pump (IPP).- The SIRUP Trial- Multicentric, Randomized, Double Blind, Prospective Study

The aim of the study is to compare the Stretta procedure and the Sham procedure efficiency 6months post-procedure in reflux uncontrolled by intake of Inhibitors of Protons Pump (IPP) patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study is over a period of 1 year. After checking eligibility, the patient will be randomised in double blind : stretta procedure /sham procedure. Control visits will take place after 4 weeks (on site), 8 weeks (by phone), 12 weeks (by phone), 18 weeks(on site) and 24 weeks(on site).During the 24 weeks visit, the therapeutic success will be evaluated.

In case of success, endoscopic control will be performed and the patient will come back on site at week 36 and 48 (end of study). In case of therapeutic failure, the stretta procedure will be proposed to the patient without breaking the blind for the 1st procedure. The procedure will be scheduled between week 24 and week 27. The patient will come back for a visit on site at weeks 31, 36 and 48 (end of visit)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

62

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bordeaux, France
        • Bordeaux Universitary Hospital
      • Brest, France, 29200
        • Brest universitary hospital
      • Colombes, France, 92700
        • APHP - Louis Mourier hospital
      • Lyon, France, 69000
        • Lyon Universitary Hospital
      • Rouen, France, 76000
        • Rouen Universitary Hospital
    • Loire Atlantique
      • Nantes, Loire Atlantique, France, 44093
        • Nantes Universitary Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 ans
  • Severe or moderate heartburn (at least 3 heartburn times per week), persistent under treatment with IPP

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recent oeso-gastro-duodenal endoscopy(< 3 months)
  • Oesophagitis > grade A
  • Endobrachyoesophagus > C0M1
  • Hiatal Hernia > 2 cm
  • Symptoms insufficiently relieved with continued intake of IPP or with intake of IPP according to needs
  • Predominant symptom of Gastrooesophageal reflux disease other than heartburn
  • Patients contra-indicated for radiofrequency technique
  • Pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Stretta procedure

Patient randomized in Stretta procedure arm will be hospitalized to have endoscopy and esophagus will receive radiofrequency.

Control visits will then take place until Month 6. At this visit endoscopic control will take place.

Other Names:
  • Radiofrequency of esophagus
Sham Comparator: Sham procedure

Patient randomized in Sham procedure arm will be hospitalized to have endoscopy. Material necessary to perform Stretta procedure will be inserted (like in Stretta procedure arm) BUT esophagus will not receive radiofrequency.

Control visits will then take place until Month 6. At this visit endoscopic control will take place.

No radiofrequency delivered

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficiency of the treatment 6 months post-procedure
Time Frame: 6 months
Evaluate the efficiency of the treatment 6 months post-procedure according to the patient's answers to the 2 following items : IPP treatment taken less than 7 days /week and adequate relief of symptoms. These results will be completed by the patient on a calendar during 2 weeks before the visit week 24
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effects on digestive symptoms
Time Frame: 6 months
Compare Stretta and sham procedure according to complete relief of digestive symptoms and pyrosis (calculation based upon number of days without digestive symptoms and pyrosis as indicated by the patient on a questionary completed during the 2 weeks preceding visits à 6 months)
6 months
Effects on digestive symptoms
Time Frame: 1 year
Compare Stretta and sham procedure according to complete relief of digestive symptoms and pyrosis (calculation based upon number of days without digestive symptoms and pyrosis as indicated by the patient on a questionary completed during the 2 weeks preceding visits à 12 months)
1 year
Necessity of IPP treatment
Time Frame: 6 months
Compare Stretta and sham procedure according to necessity of IPP treatment
6 months
necessity of IPP treatment
Time Frame: 1 year
Compare Stretta and sham procedure according to necessity of IPP treatment
1 year
Tolerance
Time Frame: 6 months
Compare Stretta and sham procedure according to Tolerance analysed by recording of adverse events (sides effects of each procedure) until week 24.
6 months
Tolerance
Time Frame: 1 year
Compare Stretta and sham procedure according to Tolerance analysed by recording of adverse events (sides effects of each procedure) until week 48.
1 year
Quality of live
Time Frame: 6 months
Compare Stretta and sham procedure according to Quality of life (use of quality of life questionaries)
6 months
Quality of life
Time Frame: 1 year
Compare Stretta and sham procedure according to Quality of life
1 year
pH-impedancemetry predictive factors
Time Frame: At Inclusion
pH-impedancemetry will be realized at clinical trial start, when patient is under PPI intake to determine pH-impedancemetry predictive factors for positive response to stretta method. Acid and non acid exposition of the esophagus will be measured as well as the SAP (Symptom Association Probability) which corresponds to the probability of association between symptoms felt by the patient during the pH-impedancemetry and episodes of acid or non acid reflux.
At Inclusion
Efficiency
Time Frame: 1 year
Evaluate efficiency of the stretta procedure in patients unsatisfied after the sham procedure at week 48 according to the patient's answers to the 2 following items : IPP treatment taken less than 7 days /week and adequate relief of symptoms. These results will be completed by the patient on a calendar during 2 weeks before the visit week 48
1 year
Efficiency
Time Frame: 1 year
Evaluate efficiency of the 2nd stretta procedure in patients unsatisfied after the 1st stretta procedure at week 48 according to the patient's answers to the 2 following items : IPP treatment taken less than 7 days /week and adequate relief of symptoms. These results will be completed by the patient on a calendar during 2 weeks before the visit week 48
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stanislas Bruley des Varannes, Professor, Nantes Universitary Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Chloe Melchior, Doctor, Rouen Universitary Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Thierry Ponchon, Professor, Lyon Universitary Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Franck Zerbib, Professor, Bordeaux Universitary Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Franck Cholet, Doctor, Brest universitary hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Benoit Coffin, Professor, APHP-Louis Mourier hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 26, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 27, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 27, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

September 10, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Clinical Trials on Stretta procedure

3
Subscribe