- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01682265
Stretta In Reflux Uncontrolled by IPP (SIRUP)
Stretta In Reflux Uncontrolled by Intake of Inhibitors of Protons Pump (IPP).- The SIRUP Trial- Multicentric, Randomized, Double Blind, Prospective Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study is over a period of 1 year. After checking eligibility, the patient will be randomised in double blind : stretta procedure /sham procedure. Control visits will take place after 4 weeks (on site), 8 weeks (by phone), 12 weeks (by phone), 18 weeks(on site) and 24 weeks(on site).During the 24 weeks visit, the therapeutic success will be evaluated.
In case of success, endoscopic control will be performed and the patient will come back on site at week 36 and 48 (end of study). In case of therapeutic failure, the stretta procedure will be proposed to the patient without breaking the blind for the 1st procedure. The procedure will be scheduled between week 24 and week 27. The patient will come back for a visit on site at weeks 31, 36 and 48 (end of visit)
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bordeaux, France
- Bordeaux Universitary Hospital
-
Brest, France, 29200
- Brest universitary hospital
-
Colombes, France, 92700
- APHP - Louis Mourier hospital
-
Lyon, France, 69000
- Lyon Universitary Hospital
-
Rouen, France, 76000
- Rouen Universitary Hospital
-
-
Loire Atlantique
-
Nantes, Loire Atlantique, France, 44093
- Nantes Universitary Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 ans
- Severe or moderate heartburn (at least 3 heartburn times per week), persistent under treatment with IPP
Exclusion Criteria:
- Recent oeso-gastro-duodenal endoscopy(< 3 months)
- Oesophagitis > grade A
- Endobrachyoesophagus > C0M1
- Hiatal Hernia > 2 cm
- Symptoms insufficiently relieved with continued intake of IPP or with intake of IPP according to needs
- Predominant symptom of Gastrooesophageal reflux disease other than heartburn
- Patients contra-indicated for radiofrequency technique
- Pregnant women
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Stretta procedure
Patient randomized in Stretta procedure arm will be hospitalized to have endoscopy and esophagus will receive radiofrequency. Control visits will then take place until Month 6. At this visit endoscopic control will take place. |
Other Names:
|
Sham Comparator: Sham procedure
Patient randomized in Sham procedure arm will be hospitalized to have endoscopy. Material necessary to perform Stretta procedure will be inserted (like in Stretta procedure arm) BUT esophagus will not receive radiofrequency. Control visits will then take place until Month 6. At this visit endoscopic control will take place. |
No radiofrequency delivered
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Efficiency of the treatment 6 months post-procedure
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Evaluate the efficiency of the treatment 6 months post-procedure according to the patient's answers to the 2 following items : IPP treatment taken less than 7 days /week and adequate relief of symptoms.
These results will be completed by the patient on a calendar during 2 weeks before the visit week 24
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Effects on digestive symptoms
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Compare Stretta and sham procedure according to complete relief of digestive symptoms and pyrosis (calculation based upon number of days without digestive symptoms and pyrosis as indicated by the patient on a questionary completed during the 2 weeks preceding visits à 6 months)
|
6 months
|
Effects on digestive symptoms
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Compare Stretta and sham procedure according to complete relief of digestive symptoms and pyrosis (calculation based upon number of days without digestive symptoms and pyrosis as indicated by the patient on a questionary completed during the 2 weeks preceding visits à 12 months)
|
1 year
|
Necessity of IPP treatment
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Compare Stretta and sham procedure according to necessity of IPP treatment
|
6 months
|
necessity of IPP treatment
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Compare Stretta and sham procedure according to necessity of IPP treatment
|
1 year
|
Tolerance
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Compare Stretta and sham procedure according to Tolerance analysed by recording of adverse events (sides effects of each procedure) until week 24.
|
6 months
|
Tolerance
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Compare Stretta and sham procedure according to Tolerance analysed by recording of adverse events (sides effects of each procedure) until week 48.
|
1 year
|
Quality of live
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Compare Stretta and sham procedure according to Quality of life (use of quality of life questionaries)
|
6 months
|
Quality of life
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Compare Stretta and sham procedure according to Quality of life
|
1 year
|
pH-impedancemetry predictive factors
Time Frame: At Inclusion
|
pH-impedancemetry will be realized at clinical trial start, when patient is under PPI intake to determine pH-impedancemetry predictive factors for positive response to stretta method.
Acid and non acid exposition of the esophagus will be measured as well as the SAP (Symptom Association Probability) which corresponds to the probability of association between symptoms felt by the patient during the pH-impedancemetry and episodes of acid or non acid reflux.
|
At Inclusion
|
Efficiency
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Evaluate efficiency of the stretta procedure in patients unsatisfied after the sham procedure at week 48 according to the patient's answers to the 2 following items : IPP treatment taken less than 7 days /week and adequate relief of symptoms.
These results will be completed by the patient on a calendar during 2 weeks before the visit week 48
|
1 year
|
Efficiency
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Evaluate efficiency of the 2nd stretta procedure in patients unsatisfied after the 1st stretta procedure at week 48 according to the patient's answers to the 2 following items : IPP treatment taken less than 7 days /week and adequate relief of symptoms.
These results will be completed by the patient on a calendar during 2 weeks before the visit week 48
|
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Stanislas Bruley des Varannes, Professor, Nantes Universitary Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Chloe Melchior, Doctor, Rouen Universitary Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Thierry Ponchon, Professor, Lyon Universitary Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Franck Zerbib, Professor, Bordeaux Universitary Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Franck Cholet, Doctor, Brest universitary hospital
- Principal Investigator: Benoit Coffin, Professor, APHP-Louis Mourier hospital
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- BRD/11/06-Q
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
-
TakedaTerminatedGastroesophageal Reflux Disease | Non-erosive Reflux DiseaseSwitzerland, Netherlands
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterCompletedGastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) | Non-erosive Reflux Disease (NERD)United States
-
Mansoura UniversityWithdrawnGastroesophageal Reflux Disease
-
Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université...UnknownGastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseBelgium
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedReflux, Gastroesophageal | Gastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseAustralia
-
King Chulalongkorn Memorial HospitalCompleted
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)CompletedGastroesophageal Reflux Disease | GERD | Acid Reflux | RefluxUnited States
-
PfizerTerminatedGastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseBrazil, Germany, Korea, Republic of, Belgium, Spain, Slovakia, France
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedReflux, Gastroesophageal | Gastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseAustralia
-
Duke UniversityNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedGastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) | RefluxUnited States, Canada
Clinical Trials on Stretta procedure
-
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, IndiaUnknown
-
Military University Hospital, PragueRecruiting
-
Montefiore Medical CenterAlbert Einstein College of MedicineTerminated
-
St George's, University of LondonWingate Institute of NeurogastroenterologyRecruitingGastroesophageal RefluxUnited Kingdom
-
Capital Medical UniversityUnknown
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenTimshel BVRecruiting
-
Nantes University HospitalCompletedGastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseFrance
-
Minia UniversityCompletedVisual Impairment | IOP DecreasedEgypt
-
University Hospital, ToulouseCompletedTobacco Use DisorderFrance
-
NYU Langone HealthCompleted