Safety Study of MRI-guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate Tissue to Treat Localized Prostate Cancer

January 29, 2020 updated by: Profound Medical Inc.

Phase 1 Study: A Prospective, Multi-center, Single Arm Study - Evaluation of the Safety and Feasibility of MRI-guided Transurethral Ultrasound Therapy for the Ablation of Prostate Tissue in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer

This study is to evaluate that the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided transurethral ultrasound therapy system is safe and feasible to ablate prostate tissue in men with localized prostate cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Profound Medical Inc. has developed a novel technology called the MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound therapy system. The technology is developed for patients with organ confined prostate cancer. The therapeutic endpoint of this technology is thermal coagulation of prostate tissue.

The treatment is conducted completely within an MRI suite, which enables real-time temperature images of the heated region to be acquired as the ultrasonic treatment is delivered. Using MRI thermometry during treatment, dynamic temperature feedback control over the intensity of the ultrasound beams and rotation of the Ultrasound Applicator can shape the pattern of thermal coagulation accurately and precisely in the prostate gland, thereby reducing the risk of possible damage to important surrounding anatomy such as the rectum, urinary sphincters, neurovascular bundles and pelvic bone. This coagulation method, therefore, has the potential to have lower complication rates than conventional therapies.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5W9
        • London Health Science Centre
      • Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
        • German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)
    • Michigan
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
        • William Beaumont Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 75 years (OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male, age ≥65
  • Patient with low-risk, early-stage organ-confined prostate cancer (Stage T1c or T2a, N0, M0).
  • Gleason score 6 (3+3)
  • Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤ 10 ng/ml
  • Eligible for MR imaging (DOC-10252)
  • Meets the following criteria on pre-treatment transrectal ultrasound imaging:

    1. No cysts or calcifications > 1.0 cm in size
    2. No evidence of extraprostatic extension or seminal vesicle invasion
    3. Overall prostate size less than 5 cm in sagittal length and less than 7 cm in diameter
  • Biopsy confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate, performed at least 6 weeks prior to and no more than 6 months prior to the scheduled treatment.
  • Eligible for General Anesthesia, as defined in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)
  • Normal rectal anatomy and rectal mucosa on digital rectal examination

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bleeding disorder
  • Abnormal coagulation and current anticoagulant therapy.
  • Acute or chronic Urinary Tract Infection
  • Interest in future fertility
  • History of allergy relevant medication or other
  • History of any other malignancy other than skin cancer
  • Patients with peripheral arterial disease with intermittent claudication or Leriches Syndrome
  • Prior treatment of the prostate gland
  • Prior treatment with 5 alpha reductase inhibitor allowed (not as prostate cancer treatment or prevention) as long as drug has been stopped for minimum 3 months
  • History of any major rectal or pelvic surgery
  • History of ulcerative colitis or other chronic inflammatory conditions affecting rectum
  • History of documented clinical prostatitis requiring therapy within previous 6 months
  • History of urethral and bladder outlet disorders, including urethral stricture disease, urethral diverticulae, bladder neck contracture, urethral fistulae which had required prior urethrotomy, urethral stenting, urethroplasty or chronic indwelling urethral catheter
  • Patients with artificial urinary sphincter or any penile implant (metallic or non-metallic)
  • Neurologic bladder disorders
  • Untreated bladder stones
  • History of acute urinary retention
  • Confirmed or suspected bladder cancer
  • Urinary sphincter abnormalities
  • Active untreated gross hematuria for any cause
  • Post Void Residual (PVR) bladder volume > 250 mL
  • Obstructing median lobe enlarged out of proportion to the rest of the prostate and protruding significantly into the bladder

Additional exclusion criteria on file....

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: MR-Guided Transurethral US Ablation
MR-Guided Transurethral US Ablation of Prostate Tissue
The technology is developed to treat patients with organ confined prostate cancer. The therapeutic endpoint of this technology is thermal coagulation of prostate tissue.
Other Names:
  • Prostate Ablation Device: PAD-105

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety - Evaluate the Frequency of Treatment Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: 12 months from the Treatment Date
All reported adverse events were recorded. The frequency was measured as the number of study participants who experienced a treatment/device related adverse event after receiving treatment delivery with PAD-105, the investigational device.
12 months from the Treatment Date
Safety - Evaluate the Severity of Treatment Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: 12 months from the Treatment Date

Severity of treatment/device related adverse events were evaluated in accordance with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) standard (version 4), published by the National Cancer Institute (NCI).

There was no intraoperative complication, no rectal injury or fistula and no severe urinary incontinence. No Grade 4 (G4) or higher adverse events and only one attributable Grade 3 (G3) event; reported below. The common and significant Grade 1 (G1) and Grade 2 (G2) genitourinary events have also been reported.

12 months from the Treatment Date

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility - Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Investigational System to Thermally Coagulate Prostate Tissue Conforming to the Target Volume With a High Degree of Accuracy and Precision
Time Frame: On Treatment Date
Conformal thermal coagulation of prostate tissue will be determined quantitatively using measures of targeting accuracy which compare the spatial difference between the target volume and target temperature isotherm determined from MR thermometry images acquired during treatment.
On Treatment Date

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment Efficacy - Biopsy
Time Frame: 12 months from the Treatment Date
Evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment to achieve disease control at 12 months based on biopsy results.
12 months from the Treatment Date
Treatment Efficacy - PSA
Time Frame: As per the Study Schedule, measured at 1-month, 3-months, 6-months and 12-months from the Treatment Date compared to Baseline
Based on measurements obtained at each study visit, characterize the pattern of PSA response within the first 12 months following treatment in comparison to baseline.
As per the Study Schedule, measured at 1-month, 3-months, 6-months and 12-months from the Treatment Date compared to Baseline
Treatment Efficacy - Quality of Life - Urinary Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline and 12-months post Treatment

Evaluate quality of life in the first 12 months following Treatment compared to Baseline, using a standardized questionnaire, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), which focuses on urinary symptoms.

Total Score: 0 - 35 0-7 - mildly symptomatic 8-19 - moderately symptomatic 20-35 - severely symptomatic

Baseline and 12-months post Treatment
Treatment Efficacy - Quality of Life - Erectile Function
Time Frame: Baseline and 12-months post Treatment

Evaluate quality of life in the first 12 months following Treatment compared to Baseline, using a standardized questionnaire, Erectile Function EF domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15), which focuses on erectile symptoms.

Minimum score value - 0 Maximum score value - 30 A higher score corresponds to a better outcome; lower score indicative of erectile dysfunction

Baseline and 12-months post Treatment
Treatment Efficacy - Quality of Life - Bowel Habits
Time Frame: Baseline and 12-months post Treatment

Evaluate quality of life in the first 12 months following Treatment compared to Baseline, using a standardized questionnaire, Bowel Habits domain of the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index Short Form (UCLA-PCl-SF-BH), which focuses on bowel symptoms.

Minimum score value - 0 Maximum score value - 100 A higher score corresponds to better outcome

Baseline and 12-months post Treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joseph Chin, MD, London Health Science Center
  • Principal Investigator: James Relle, MD, William Beaumont Hospitals
  • Principal Investigator: Ryan Berglund, MD, The Cleveland Clinic
  • Principal Investigator: Heinz P Schlemmer, MD, German Cancer Research Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 13, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 23, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 11, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 18, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on MR-Guided Transurethral US Ablation of Prostate Tissue

3
Subscribe