A Pilot Trial of Sonoelastography for Planning Tumor-targeted Prostate Biopsy

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer and the second-leading cause of cancer death amongst men in the United States. Sonoelastography is an imaging technology predicated on reproducible differences in the backscattered ultrasound signal produced by compression of tissues of varying stiffness. It permits measurement of the elastic properties of tissue. These measurements can be transposed onto conventional anatomic ultrasound images, producing a colorized overlay that allows direct visualization of the anatomic distribution of tissue stiffness. In this study, we aim to determine whether prostate biopsies planned with sonoelastographic guidance would be more likely than random prostate biopsies to intersect with foci of carcinoma in the prostate gland, and to determine whether prostate biopsies planned with sonoelastographic guidance would be more likely than random prostate biopsies to yield histopathology representative of the final Gleason Score obtained at pathologic assessment of the resected prostate.

Study Overview

• Status: Terminated
• Conditions: Prostate Cancer
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Sonoelastography

Detailed Description

Background and Significance Prostate cancer is the most common cancer and the second-leading cause of cancer death amongst men in the United States. Initially, tumors biopsy guided by detected by conventional B-mode transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). Unfortunately, prostate cancer had a highly variable ultrasound echo pattern and may be indistinguishable from normal prostate, and the sonographic appearance of BPH overlaps with that of prostatic carcinoma, which limited the accuracy of conventional ultrasound, producing sensitivity and specificity for prostate carcinoma of only 40-50%. There is therefore an urgent need for better localization and more accurate biopsy of prostate cancer.

Sonoelastography is an imaging technology predicated on reproducible differences in the backscattered ultrasound signal produced by compression of tissues of varying stiffness. It permits measurement of the elastic properties of tissue. These measurements can be transposed onto conventional anatomic ultrasound images, producing a colorized overlay that allows direct visualization of the anatomic distribution of tissue stiffness.

Previously, several studies have reported that the feasibility of sonoelastography to distinguish between benign and malignant nodules and thereby guide biopsy. These assessments were based on the change in anatomic appearance of nodules after compression with a transrectal ultrasound probe. However, these reports did not specify the criteria used to determine that lesions seen by elastography were the same lesions seen by histopathology, did not assess whether biopsies planned with the assistance of sonoelastography would have intersected with the foci of prostate cancer, and did not address the histopathologic characteristics of areas of the prostate that were falsely positive at sonoelastography.

If sonoelastography were to more accurately delineate foci of tumor in the prostate than B mode ultrasound, and it could be used to guide biopsy, then there would be fewer missed cancers at biopsy. In addition, sonoelastography-guided biopsies may be more representative of the ultimate Gleason Score of the tumor.

Specific Aims:

Aim 1: To determine whether prostate biopsies planned with sonoelastographic guidance would be more likely than random prostate biopsies to intersect with foci of carcinoma in the prostate gland.

Aim 2: To determine whether prostate biopsies planned with sonoelastographic guidance would be more likely than random prostate biopsies to yield histopathology representative of the final Gleason Score obtained at pathologic assessment of the resected prostate.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 4
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Massachusetts
    • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
      • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age 18 years of age or older.
2. Serum PSA between 4 and 10 ng/mL.
3. A diagnosis of prostate cancer based on extended (twelve core) random prostate biopsy within three months prior to study entry.
4. Clinically localized prostate carcinoma i.e. TNM stage T2c or less.
5. The patient has elected to undergo radical prostatectomy to treat the prostate carcinoma.
6. The patient consents to undergo a diagnostic transrectal ultrasound of the prostate with elastography.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Any contraindication to transrectal ultrasonography, including prior anorectal surgery, inflammatory bowel disease, rectal fistula, or fissure-in-ano.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sonoelastography; Sonoelastography is an imaging technology predicated on reproducible differences in the backscattered ultrasound signal produced by compression of tissues of varying stiffness.	Device: Sonoelastography; Sonoelastography is an imaging technology predicated on reproducible differences in the backscattered ultrasound signal produced by compression of tissues of varying stiffness.; Other Names: Hitachi; HI VISION Preirus

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
The Number of Core Biopsies in These Targeted Regions	From elastography-prostatectomy pathology correlation, the following data will be obtained, 1) The number of planned core biopsies that would intersect foci of prostate carcinoma, 2) The Gleason Score that would be obtained, assuming that elastographically targeted biopsies sample the targeted region.	Participants will be followed until prostatectomy pathology is available (average 1 week)

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Massachusetts General Hospital
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Anthony E. Samir, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: December 1, 2009
• Primary Completion (Actual): December 1, 2012
• Study Completion (Actual): December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: October 31, 2012
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: December 12, 2012
• First Posted (Estimate): December 13, 2012

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): October 20, 2017
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 19, 2017
• Last Verified: October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Neoplasms; Urogenital Neoplasms; Neoplasms by Site; Genital Neoplasms, Male; Prostatic Diseases; Prostatic Neoplasms
• Other Study ID Numbers: 09-395