- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01774565
Closed-loop Insulin Delivery in the General Ward (ANGIE02)
A Randomised Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Automated Closed-loop Glucose Control in Insulin Treated Type 2 Diabetes (Phase 1), Inpatient Hyperglycaemia Requiring Subcutaneous Insulin Therapy (Phase 2 and Phase 3) and to Evaluate Use of Closed-loop Applying Faster Insulin Aspart Versus Standard Insulin Aspart (Phase 4)
The study assesses the efficacy and safety of closed-loop glucose control in patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.
Phase 1 The study objective is to compare conventional insulin therapy with closed-loop glucose control combined with once daily basal insulin injection over 72 hours in hospitalised insulin treated T2D subjects.
Phase 2 The study objective is to compare conventional insulin therapy with closed-loop glucose control up to maximum 15 days in hospitalised insulin treated T2D subjects.
Phase 3 The study objective is to compare conventional insulin therapy with closed-loop glucose control applying faster insulin aspart up to maximum 15 days in insulin-treated inpatients receiving parenteral and/or enteral nutrition.
Phase 4 The study objective is to compare automated closed-loop control using faster acting insulin aspart with closed-loop control using standard insulin aspart.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Hyperglycaemia in hospitalized patients is becoming a common clinical problem due to the increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus . Hyperglycaemia in this cohort can also occur in patients with previously undiagnosed diabetes, or during acute illness in those with previously normal glucose tolerance. As a result, the prevalence of acute or stress hyperglycaemia in hospitalised patients has been widely reported. A growing body of evidence currently suggest that the degree of hyperglycaemia upon admission and the duration of hyperglycaemia during their illness are associated with adverse outcomes.In-patient hyperglycaemia is now widely recognised as a poor prognostic marker in terms of morbidity and mortality, increased length of stay and cost to the healthcare system.
The current management of in-patient hyperglycaemia in non-critical care is still far from ideal, and vary widely between different centres. The discordance between clinical evidence and practice is due to a number of factors which could potentially undermine patient care and safety. Of these, hypoglycaemia remains one the biggest barriers to managing in-patient hyperglycaemia. There is therefore a need to develop and validate a more effective and safer system to manage in-patient hyperglycaemia.
A closed-loop insulin infusion system has previously been tested and reported to be feasible and safe in intensive care patients. Its utilisation in non-critical patients in the general medical and surgical wards currently remains unproven. Its use in this cohort however could potentially be of significant practical and clinical value, especially in a busy ward environment. The Model Predictive Control (MPC) algorithm developed by our group at the University of Cambridge utilises fundamental glucoregulatory processes and predicts future glucose excursion resulting from projected insulin infusion rates. The algorithm can also account for the patient's meal intake and the duration of action of the short acting insulin used. This has the distinct advantage over the "reactive" approach of sliding scale insulin protocols, which treats hyperglycaemia after it has already occurred.
The MPC algorithm has been studied in intensive care and cardiac surgery patients, and results from these studies to date have been encouraging. It is shown to be associated with a significantly higher percentage of time within the blood glucose target range, without increasing the risk of severe hypoglycaemia. The expectant role of a closed-loop system using the MPC algorithm in non-critical care patients would therefore be to provide clinicians with an effective and safe method to manage hyperglycaemia in hospital.
In early 2017, faster-acting insulin aspart (Fiasp, Novo Nordisk, Copenhagen, Denmark) received marketing authorisation from the European Commission. Due to the more favourable pharmacokinetic profile, Fiasp has the potential to further improve safety and efficacy of fully automated closed-loop glucose control.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bern, Switzerland, 3010
- Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism
-
-
-
-
-
Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 18 years or older
- Type 2 Diabetes for at least 1 year as defined by WHO (phase 1 and 4)
- Inpatient hyperglycaemia requiring subcutaneous insulin therapy (phase 2 and 3)
- Treatment with subcutaneous insulin alone or in combination with oral glucose-lowering medication(s) (phase 4: basal bolus insulin regime for at least 3 months)
- Receiving parenteral and/or enteral nutrition (phase 3)
- HbA1c<11.0% (phase 4)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Autoimmune type 1 diabetes
- Known or suspected allergy against insulin
- Known proliferative retinopathy
- Current or planned pregnancy or breast feeding
- Unstable or end-stage cardiac and renal disease (phase 1 only)
- Planned surgery during study period (phase 1 only)
- Current in-patient in intensive care unit
- Any physical or psychological disease or medication(s) likely to interfere with the conduct of the study and interpretation of the study results, as judged by the study clinician
- Likely discharge earlier than 72 hours (phase 1 only)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Fully Automated Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery (phase 1-4)
The control algorithm will automatically direct between meals and meal-related subcutaneous insulin delivery utilizing real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) data.
The subcutaneous insulin pump will deliver insulin Aspart or similar.
In phase 1, a once daily basal insulin analogue will also be given subcutaneously at 20% the patient's usual total daily dose.
In phase 3 and 4 faster-acting insulin aspart (Fiasp) is applied.
|
|
Active Comparator: Usual care/ fully-automated closed-loop using Iasp
Phase 1-3: During usual care (conventional therapy), subject's s.c. insulin dose and regimen on admission will be adjusted as necessary by the clinical team according to local centres' usual clinical practice. Subjects will have masked CGM sensors inserted during the study (CGM readings will be masked throughout the study). Phase 4: subjects will receive fully-automated insulin delivery using standard insulin aspart (Iasp) |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time spent in target glucose range (5.6-10.0mmol/l)
Time Frame: Phase 1 (Pilot study) = 72-hours, Phase 2 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days
|
Primary outcome will be measured using continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) data (Phase 1-3) and plasma (Phase 4).
|
Phase 1 (Pilot study) = 72-hours, Phase 2 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Proportion of time with glucose levels below 5.6 mmol/l and above 10.0 mmol/l as recorded by CGM
Time Frame: Phase 1 (Pilot study) = 72-hours, Phase 2 and Phase 3 (Follow-up study)= Up to 15 days, Phase 4=between 07:00 and 17:00
|
CGM (Phase 1-4) and plasma glucose (Phase4)
|
Phase 1 (Pilot study) = 72-hours, Phase 2 and Phase 3 (Follow-up study)= Up to 15 days, Phase 4=between 07:00 and 17:00
|
Average glucose levels, as recorded by CGM
Time Frame: Phase 1 (Pilot study) = 72-hours, Phase 2 and Phase 3 (Follow-up study)= Up to 15 days, Phase 4=between 07:00 and 17:00
|
CGM (Phase 1-4) and plasma glucose (Phase4)
|
Phase 1 (Pilot study) = 72-hours, Phase 2 and Phase 3 (Follow-up study)= Up to 15 days, Phase 4=between 07:00 and 17:00
|
Proportion of time with glucose levels below 3.9 mmol/l as recorded by CGM
Time Frame: Phase 1 (Pilot study) = 72-hours, Phase 2 and Phase 3 (Follow-up study)= Up to 15 days, Phase 4=between 07:00 and 17:00
|
CGM (Phase 1-4) and plasma glucose (Phase4)
|
Phase 1 (Pilot study) = 72-hours, Phase 2 and Phase 3 (Follow-up study)= Up to 15 days, Phase 4=between 07:00 and 17:00
|
Proportion of time with glucose levels below 3.0 mmol/l as recorded by CGM
Time Frame: Phase 2 and Phase 3 (Follow-up study)= Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours
|
CGM (Phase 1-4) and plasma glucose (Phase4)
|
Phase 2 and Phase 3 (Follow-up study)= Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours
|
Proportion of time with glucose levels below 2.8 mmol/l as recorded by CGM
Time Frame: Phase 2 and Phase 3 (Follow-up study)= Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours
|
CGM (Phase 1-4) and plasma glucose (Phase4)
|
Phase 2 and Phase 3 (Follow-up study)= Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours
|
Area under the curve of sensor glucose levels below 3.5 mmol/l as recorded by CGM
Time Frame: Phase 1 (Pilot study) = 72-hours, Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours
|
CGM (Phase 1-4) and plasma glucose (Phase4)
|
Phase 1 (Pilot study) = 72-hours, Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours
|
Area under the curve of sensor glucose levels below 3.0 mmol/l as recorded by CGM
Time Frame: Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours
|
CGM (Phase 1-4) and plasma glucose (Phase4)
|
Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours
|
Standard deviation and coefficient of variation of glucose levels, as recorded by CGM
Time Frame: Phase 1 (Pilot study) = 72-hours, Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours
|
CGM (Phase 1-4) and plasma glucose (Phase4)
|
Phase 1 (Pilot study) = 72-hours, Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours
|
Proportion of time with glucose levels in significant hyperglycaemic range (>20mmol/l) as recorded by CGM
Time Frame: Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours
|
CGM (Phase 1-4) and plasma glucose (Phase4)
|
Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours
|
Total daily insulin dose
Time Frame: Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours
|
Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours
|
|
Between 24 hour period variability
Time Frame: Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours
|
Coefficient of variation of CGM glucose between 24 hour periods (08:00 to 08:00) (Phase 1-3)
|
Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours
|
Number of capillary glucose confirmed hypoglycaemic events <3.5mmol/l
Time Frame: Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours
|
Capillary glucose measurements will be performed using hospital point of care devices
|
Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours
|
Pre-breakfast, pre-lunch, pre-dinner, and evening capillary glucose values
Time Frame: Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days
|
Capillary glucose measurements will be performed using hospital point of care devices (Phase 1-3)
|
Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Overnight period: Proportion of time with Glucose levels in target range (5.6-10.0mmol/l) as recorded by CGM
Time Frame: Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days
|
Between 24:00 and 08:00
|
Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days
|
Overnight period: Average glucose levels, as recorded by CGM
Time Frame: Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days
|
Between 24:00 and 08:00
|
Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days
|
Overnight period: Standard deviation and coefficient of variation of glucose levels, as recorded by CGM
Time Frame: Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days
|
Between 24:00 and 08:00
|
Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days
|
Overnight period: Area under the curve of sensor glucose levels below 3.5 mmol/l as recorded by CGM
Time Frame: Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days
|
Between 24:00 and 08:00
|
Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days
|
Between night variability
Time Frame: Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days
|
Coefficient of variation of CGM glucose between nights (24:00 and 08:00 ) (Phase 1-3)
|
Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days
|
Total insulin dose overnight
Time Frame: Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days
|
Closed-loop only (24:00 and 08:00 ) (Phase 1-3)
|
Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days
|
Day period: Proportion of time with glucose levels in target range (5.6-10.0mmol/l) as recorded by CGM
Time Frame: Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 day
|
Between 08:00 and 24:00 (Phase 1-3)
|
Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 day
|
Day period: Average glucose levels, as recorded by CGM
Time Frame: Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 day
|
Between 08:00 and 24:00 (Phase 1-3)
|
Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 day
|
Day period: Standard deviation and coefficient of variation of glucose levels, as recorded by CGM
Time Frame: Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 day
|
Between 08:00 and 24:00 (Phase 1-3)
|
Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 day
|
Day period: Area under the curve of sensor glucose levels below 3.5 mmol/l as recorded by CGM
Time Frame: Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 day
|
Between 08:00 and 24:00 (Phase 1-3)
|
Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 day
|
Between day variability
Time Frame: Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 day
|
Coefficient of variation of CGM glucose between days (08:00 and 24:00 ) (Phase 1-3)
|
Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 day
|
Total insulin dose during the day
Time Frame: Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days
|
Closed-loop only (08:00 and 24:00 ) (Phase 1-3)
|
Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days
|
Safety: Number of subjects and number of occurences of severe hypoglycaemic events (capillary glucose <2.2mmol/l)
Time Frame: Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4 = up to 4 weeks
|
Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4 = up to 4 weeks
|
|
Safety: Significant hyperglycaemic events (capillary glucose >20mmol/l) with or without ketonaemia (B-OHB >0.6mmol/l)
Time Frame: Phase 2 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4 = up to 4 weeks
|
Phase 2 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4 = up to 4 weeks
|
|
Safety: Number of other (serious) adverse events (including adverse device effects) and device deficiencies
Time Frame: Phase 2 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4 = up to 4 weeks
|
Phase 2 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4 = up to 4 weeks
|
|
2-hour postprandial incremental plasma glucose (Phase 4 only)
Time Frame: 120min after meal intake
|
CGM and plasma glucose
|
120min after meal intake
|
Peak glucose (Phase 4 only)
Time Frame: over 10 hours
|
CGM and plasma glucose
|
over 10 hours
|
Mean insulin concentration (Phase 4 only)
Time Frame: over 10 hours
|
Plasma insulin concentration
|
over 10 hours
|
Time to maximal insulin concentration (Phase 4 only)
Time Frame: over 10 hours
|
Time (min) to maximal plasma insulin concentration
|
over 10 hours
|
Maximal insulin concentration (Phase 4 only)
Time Frame: over 10 hours
|
Maximal plasma insulin concentration
|
over 10 hours
|
Total and endogenous insulin exposure within 1 hour postprandial period (Phase 4 only)
Time Frame: over 10 hours
|
Total and endogenous plasma insulin exposure within 1 hour post-meal (iAUC)
|
over 10 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Roman Hovorka, PhD, MSc, BSc, University of Cambridge
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Bally L, Gubler P, Thabit H, Hartnell S, Ruan Y, Wilinska ME, Evans ML, Semmo M, Vogt B, Coll AP, Stettler C, Hovorka R. Fully closed-loop insulin delivery improves glucose control of inpatients with type 2 diabetes receiving hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 2019 Sep;96(3):593-596. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
- Boughton CK, Bally L, Martignoni F, Hartnell S, Herzig D, Vogt A, Wertli MM, Wilinska ME, Evans ML, Coll AP, Stettler C, Hovorka R. Fully closed-loop insulin delivery in inpatients receiving nutritional support: a two-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 May;7(5):368-377. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30061-0. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
- Bally L, Thabit H, Hartnell S, Andereggen E, Ruan Y, Wilinska ME, Evans ML, Wertli MM, Coll AP, Stettler C, Hovorka R. Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery for Glycemic Control in Noncritical Care. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):547-556. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805233. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
- Thabit H, Hartnell S, Allen JM, Lake A, Wilinska ME, Ruan Y, Evans ML, Coll AP, Hovorka R. Closed-loop insulin delivery in inpatients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised, parallel-group trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Feb;5(2):117-124. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30280-7. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ANGIE02
- A092763 (Other Identifier: R&D Office, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus
-
University of Colorado, DenverMassachusetts General Hospital; Beta Bionics, Inc.CompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1 | Type 1 Diabetes | Diabetes type1 | Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus | Autoimmune Diabetes | Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin-Dependent | Juvenile-Onset Diabetes | Diabetes, Autoimmune | Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus 1 | Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin-Dependent, 1 | Diabetes Mellitus, Brittle | Diabetes Mellitus, Juvenile-Onset and other conditionsUnited States
-
Guang NingRecruitingType 2 Diabetes Mellitus | Type1 Diabetes Mellitus | Monogenetic Diabetes | Pancreatogenic Diabetes | Drug-Induced Diabetes Mellitus | Other Forms of Diabetes MellitusChina
-
Medical College of WisconsinMedical University of South CarolinaCompletedDiabetes Mellitus | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus | Adult-Onset Diabetes Mellitus | Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus | Noninsulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus, Type IIUnited States
-
Hanmi Pharmaceutical Company LimitedUnknownType2 Diabetes Mellitus | Type1 Diabetes MellitusUnited States
-
Meir Medical CenterCompletedDiabetes Mellitus Type 2 | Diabetes Mellitus, Non-insulin Dependant | Diabetes Mellitus, on Oral Hypoglycemic Treatment | Adult Type Diabetes MellitusIsrael
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalUnknownType 2 Diabetes Mellitus | Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus | Gestational Diabetes Mellitus | Pancreatogenic Diabetes Mellitus | Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus | Diabetes Patients in Perioperative PeriodChina
-
SanofiCompletedType 1 Diabetes Mellitus-Type 2 Diabetes MellitusHungary, Russian Federation, Germany, Poland, Japan, United States, Finland
-
Medical University of South CarolinaNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)CompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type II | Diabetes Mellitus, Adult-Onset | Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Insulin-Dependent | Diabetes Mellitus, Noninsulin DependentUnited States
-
Medical College of WisconsinMedical University of South Carolina; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive...Active, not recruitingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type II | Diabetes Mellitus, Adult-Onset | Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Insulin-Dependent | Diabetes Mellitus, Noninsulin DependentUnited States
-
Medical College of WisconsinNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)CompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type II | Diabetes Mellitus, Adult-Onset | Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Insulin-Dependent | Diabetes Mellitus, Noninsulin DependentUnited States
Clinical Trials on Fully Automated Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery
-
University of CambridgeCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustCompletedType 1 DiabetesUnited Kingdom
-
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation...King's College London; University of Leeds; Belfast Health and Social Care Trust and other collaboratorsCompletedDiabetesUnited Kingdom
-
University of CambridgeDiabetes UKCompletedType 1 Diabetes MellitusUnited Kingdom
-
University of VirginiaNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)CompletedType 1 DiabetesUnited States
-
St Vincent's Hospital MelbourneJuvenile Diabetes Research Foundation; MedtronicCompletedType 1 DiabetesAustralia
-
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne...CompletedIntensive Care Patients Invasively VentilatedFrance, Italy
-
Imperial College LondonCompletedType 1 Diabetes MellitusUnited Kingdom
-
University of CambridgeCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustCompletedType 1 DiabetesUnited Kingdom
-
Centre Hospitalier Sud FrancilienRecruiting
-
Daniela ElleriCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUnknown