Cancer and Disorders of Cognitive Functions and Quality of Life: "Cognitive Rehabilitation in Patients Suffering From Cancer and Treated With Chemotherapy"

July 27, 2017 updated by: Centre Francois Baclesse
Our study aims to measure the impact of cognitive rehabilitation workshops on the development of cognitive functions and quality of life of patients expressing a cognitive complaint

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The main objective of our study was to evaluate, in patients treated for cancer expressing the cognitive complaint during or after treatment, interest workshops on improving cognitive rehabilitation felt their cognitive functions and their quality of life.

The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients showing an improvement in the score of perceived deficiencies (score ranging from 0 to 72) of the FACT-Cog after treatment. The FACT-Cog is a self-administered questionnaire assessing the patients felt their cognitive difficulties (memory, attention, concentration) and the impact of these difficulties on their quality of life. The improvement is defined as an increase of 7 points >= cognitive score won by the (a) patient (e) after the treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

168

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Caen, France, 14076
        • Centre Francois Baclesse
      • Rouen, France, 46038
        • Centre Henri Becquerel
      • Strasbourg, France
        • Centre Paul Strauss
      • Villejuif, France, 94805
        • Institut Gustave Roussy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients older than 18 years
  • Solid tumor or haematological
  • Chemotherapy and / or targeted therapy in the adjuvant or metastatic
  • Sequential processing
  • Subjective cognitive complaints during or after treatment assessed by four items of the FACT-COG (impact on quality of life). Score ≥ 4/16 questions Q35, Q37, Q38 and Q41 FACT COG - Patient in remission or pause therapeutic
  • Subjective between 1 month and 5 years after the end of chemotherapy and / or targeted therapy cognitive complaints (ongoing treatment with Herceptin is not a non-inclusion criteria)
  • Lack of personality disorders and / or psychiatric disorder scalable
  • No known brain metastases
  • Lack of primary brain tumor
  • Lack of analgesic treatment with opioids or Class 3
  • Having signed informed consent to participate in the study
  • Mastery of the French language

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary cancer of the central nervous system or brain metastases
  • Pathology malignant hematologic
  • Disorders of higher functions documented
  • Pathology psychiatric scalable
  • Use documented drug
  • Cancer treated in childhood
  • Patient or opioids analgesics in Class 3
  • Consumption of alcohol
  • Patient unable to respond to cognitive tests and cognitive rehabilitation
  • Refusal to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Experimental group
Cognitive exams at T0 and T3. Patients will achieve 9 standardized cognitive rehabilitation sessions with the RehaCom ® software (over 3 months), and a self-assessment of their monthly experienced cognitive functioning using the self-administered questionnaire FACT-Cog

Psychopathological assessment (T0 and T3):

  • Scale of Spielberger
  • The self-administered questionnaire CES-D

Cognitive assessment(T0 and T3):

- MMS, Grober and Buschke test, memory for numbers (WAIS IV) sequence of numbers and letters (WAIS IV), arithmetic (WAIS IV), Trail Making Test, verbal Fluence, D2, Code (WAIS IV)

Quality of Life: FACT-G and FACT-An Fatigue Module (T0 and T3):

Self-assessment FACT-COG (T0,every months until T3)

Patients will achieve 9 standardized cognitive rehabilitation sessions with the RehaCom ® software (over 3 months), and a self-assessment of their monthly experienced cognitive functioning using the self-administered questionnaire FACT-Cog
Other: The control group 1 (Homework)
Cognitive exams at T0 and T3. These patients will take part in 9 sessions standardized home exercise (over 3 months), and a self-assessment every month felt their cognitive functioning using the self-administered questionnaire FACT Cog

Psychopathological assessment (T0 and T3):

  • Scale of Spielberger
  • The self-administered questionnaire CES-D

Cognitive assessment(T0 and T3):

- MMS, Grober and Buschke test, memory for numbers (WAIS IV) sequence of numbers and letters (WAIS IV), arithmetic (WAIS IV), Trail Making Test, verbal Fluence, D2, Code (WAIS IV)

Quality of Life: FACT-G and FACT-An Fatigue Module (T0 and T3):

Self-assessment FACT-COG (T0,every months until T3)

These patients will take part in 9 sessions standardized home exercise (over 3 months), and a self-assessment every month felt their cognitive functioning using the self-administered questionnaire FACT Cog
Other: Control group 2 ( telephone follow)
Cognitive exams at T0 and T3. These patients receive follow-up by phone (9 telephone calls over a period of 3 months) standardized optics to know the evolution of the disorder and felt the same way as for the other groups, a monthly self-assessment the feeling of cognitive functioning using the self-administered questionnaire FACT-Cog

Psychopathological assessment (T0 and T3):

  • Scale of Spielberger
  • The self-administered questionnaire CES-D

Cognitive assessment(T0 and T3):

- MMS, Grober and Buschke test, memory for numbers (WAIS IV) sequence of numbers and letters (WAIS IV), arithmetic (WAIS IV), Trail Making Test, verbal Fluence, D2, Code (WAIS IV)

Quality of Life: FACT-G and FACT-An Fatigue Module (T0 and T3):

Self-assessment FACT-COG (T0,every months until T3)

These patients receive follow-up by phone (9 telephone calls over a period of 3 months) standardized optics to know the evolution of the disorder and felt the same way as for the other groups, a monthly self-assessment the feeling of cognitive functioning using the self-administered questionnaire FACT-Cog

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients showing an improvement in the score of perceived deficiencies (score ranging from 0 to 72) of the FACT-Cog after care
Time Frame: up to 3 months

Evaluate, in patients treated for cancer expressing a cognitive complaint during or after the treatment, the interest workshops on improving cognitive rehabilitation felt their cognitive function and quality of life.

Autoquestionnary FACT COG

up to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the relationship between cognitive impairment and the parameters of the quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline and month 3

Cognitive assessment:

MMS, Test de Grober et Buschke, mémoire des chiffres (WAIS IV), séquence lettres-chiffres (WAIS IV), arithmétique (WAIS IV), Trail Making Test, Fluence verbale, D2, Code (WAIS IV)

Baseline and month 3
Assess the relationships between goals disorders (measured by neuropsychological tests) and the patients felt
Time Frame: Baseline and month 3

Cognitive assessment:

MMS, Test de Grober et Buschke, mémoire des chiffres (WAIS IV), séquence lettres-chiffres (WAIS IV), arithmétique (WAIS IV), Trail Making Test, Fluence verbale, D2, Code (WAIS IV)

Baseline and month 3
Study of different types of interest support the evolution of objective and subjective cognitive performance of patients
Time Frame: Baseline and month 3

Cognitive assesment:

MMS, Test de Grober et Buschke, mémoire des chiffres (WAIS IV), séquence lettres-chiffres (WAIS IV), arithmétique (WAIS IV), Trail Making Test, Fluence verbale, D2, Code (WAIS IV)

Baseline and month 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Florence JOLY-LOBBEDEZ, PHD, Centre Francois Baclesse

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

February 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • COG REDUC

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Cognitive exams

3
Subscribe