- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01813890
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Tapentadol (CG5503) in the Treatment of Acute Pain From Bunionectomy Compared With Placebo
December 31, 2014 updated by: Janssen-Cilag International NV
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tapentadol Immediate-Release Formulation in the Treatment of Acute Pain From Bunionectomy
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of tapentadol immediate-release (IR [CG5503]) for use in the relief of moderate to severe acute pain, compared with placebo, in adult Taiwanese patients with acute pain following bunionectomy.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients undergoing bunionectomy (a surgical procedure to remove a bunion, an enlargement of the joint at the base of the big toe comprised of bone and soft tissue) often experience moderate to severe acute pain post-surgery.
Normally such pain is controlled when patients receive repeated doses of opioid analgesics.
Tapentadol (CG5503) is a newly synthesized opioid drug acting as a centrally acting analgesic like opioid analgesics but has a different mode of action.
This study, a randomized (patients are assigned different treatments based on chance), double-blind (neither investigator nor patient knows which treatment the patient receives), placebo-controlled (placebo is an inactive substance that is compared with a drug to test whether the drug has a real effect in a clinical trial), parallel-group (each group of patients will be treated at the same time), multicenter study (the study is performed at more than one clinic) is designed to evaluate the effectiveness (level of pain control) and safety (side effects) of tapentadol immediate-release (IR) 50 mg or 75 mg versus placebo.
The study will consist of a screening phase, during which the patients will be evaluated for study entry (Days -28 to -2) followed by the surgical period (Day -1) during which the bunionectomy will be performed and which will start with the first surgical incision and continues until termination of the popliteal sciatic block (PSB) infusion.
During the qualification period (Day 1) which starts after termination of the post-operative continuous PSB infusion, patients will be evaluated for entry in the double blind treatment phase.
Patients will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups to receive either 50 mg tapentadol IR, 75 mg tapentadol IR or a placebo if their PI is equal to or greater than 4 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale.
The inpatient double-blind treatment period will be 72 hours in duration and will include a final end-of-double-blind evaluation (on Day 4, i.e., 72 hours after the administration of the first dose) for all patients.
Any patient requiring analgesia for pain relief in addition to study drug during the double-blind treatment period will be discontinued from the study due to lack of efficacy.
All patients who discontinue for lack of efficacy will complete pain assessments and the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) before receiving rescue medication.
Pain intensity and pain relief will be periodically assessed during the treatment period using rating scales.
Safety evaluations include monitoring of adverse events, physical examinations, and clinical laboratory tests.
The study length, including the screening period, will be up to a maximum duration of 32 days.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
60
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Kaohsiung, Taiwan
-
Taipei, Taiwan
-
Taoyuan, Taiwan
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients must be undergoing primary unilateral first metatarsal bunionectomy that includes a distal Chevron osteotomy only, with or without the Akin procedure
- Patients must be healthy or medically stable on the basis of clinical laboratory tests performed at screening
- Women must be postmenopausal, surgically sterile, abstinent, or practicing or agree to practice an effective method of birth control and have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and a negative urine pregnancy test before surgery
- If a male, must use an approved method of birth control and does not donate sperm from the day of study drug administration until 3 months afterwards
- Qualifying baseline Pain Intensity must be rated as greater than or equal to 4 on an 11-point (0 to 10) PI NRS, recorded within 30 minutes before randomization, no earlier than 10 hours after the first surgical incision and within 9 hours after termination of the continuous Popliteal Sciatic Block (PSB) infusion Exclusion Criteria: - History of seizure disorder or epilepsy, severe traumatic brain injury, episode(s) of unconsciousness of more than 24 hours duration, malignancy in the past 2 years with the exception of successfully treated basal cell carcinoma
- Mild or moderate traumatic brain injury, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or brain neoplasm within 1 year of screening
- Renal insufficiency, impaired hepatic function
- Use of anticonvulsants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), neuroleptics, serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or triptans
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
|
Placebo will be administered as a single oral dose once every 4 to 6 hours, during the double blind treatment period.
|
Experimental: Tapentadol IR 50 mg
|
Tapentadol IR 50 mg will be administered as a single oral dose once every 4 to 6 hours, during the double blind treatment period.
|
Experimental: Tapentadol IR 75 mg
|
Tapentadol IR 75 mg will be administered as a single oral dose once every 4 to 6 hours, during the double blind treatment period.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over 48 Hours
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine.
PID was the difference between baseline PI (prior to the first dose) and current PI at assessment.
SPID was calculated as the time-weighted Sum of PID scores over 48 hours.
Total score ranges from -480 (worst) to 480 (best) for SPID48.
A higher value of SPID indicates greater pain relief.
|
48 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time to First Rescue Medication Use
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
|
Rescue medication was defined as any analgesic medication used for participants discontinued due to lack of efficacy (including those started at time of discontinuation) or analgesic medication used during the double-blind period for completed participants.
|
up to 48 hours
|
Response Rate for 30 Percent or Greater Reduction in Pain Intensity at 12, 24, 48 and 72 Hours
Time Frame: 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours
|
Response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a 30 percent or greater reduction in pain intensity from baseline to 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours.
Pain intensity was assessed on a 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine.
Participants with no assessment at the given time point, who used an analgesic medication prior to the time point, or who had worse pain intensity at the time point compared to baseline were assigned a percent reduction of 0 percent.
|
12, 24, 48 and 72 hours
|
Response Rate for 50 Percent or Greater Reduction in Pain Intensity at 12, 24, 48 and 72 Hours
Time Frame: 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours
|
Response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a 50 percent or greater reduction in pain intensity from baseline to 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours.
Pain intensity was assessed on a 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine.
Participants with no assessment at the given time point, who used an analgesic medication prior to the time point, or who had worse pain intensity at the time point compared to baseline were assigned a percent reduction of 0 percent.
|
12, 24, 48 and 72 hours
|
Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) Over 12, 24 and 72 Hours
Time Frame: 12, 24 and 72 hours
|
Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine.
PID was the difference between baseline PI (prior to the first dose) and current PI at assessment.
SPID was calculated as the time-weighted Sum of PID scores over 12, 24, and 72 hours.
Total score ranges from -120 (worst) to 120 (best) for SPID12, -240 (worst) to 240 (best) for SPID24, -720 (worst) to 720 (best) for SPID72.
A higher value of SPID indicates greater pain relief.
|
12, 24 and 72 hours
|
Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) Over 12, 24, 48, and 72 Hours
Time Frame: 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours
|
Participants rated pain relief on 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=A little, 2=Some, 3=A lot, 4=Complete).
Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) was calculated as the time-weighted sum of pain relief scores up to Hour 12, 24, 48, and 72.
Total score ranges from 0 (worst) to 48 (best) for TOTPAR12, 0 (worst) to 96 (best) for TOTPAR24, 0 (worst) to 192 (best) for TOTPAR48, and 0 (worst) to 288 (best) for TOTPAR72.
A higher value of TOTPAR indicated greater pain relief.
|
12, 24, 48, and 72 hours
|
Sum of Pain Relief and Pain Intensity Differences (SPRID) Over 12, 24, 48, and 72 Hours
Time Frame: 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours
|
Participants rated pain relief on 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=A little, 2=Some, 3=A lot, 4=Complete).
Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine.
PID was the difference between baseline PI (prior to the first dose) and current PI at assessment.
PRID is the sum of pain relief and PID at the same assessment time.
SPRID was calculated as the time-weighted Sum of PRID scores over 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours.
Total score ranges from -120 (worst) to 168 (best) for SPRID12, -240 (worst) to 336 (best) for SPRID24, -480 (worst) to 672 (best) for SPRID48, and -720 (worst) to 1008 (best) for SPRID72.
A higher value of SPRID indicates greater pain relief.
|
12, 24, 48 and 72 hours
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at 72 Hours
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and 72 hours
|
The PGI-C is a 7-point scale that requires the participants to assess how much their illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention.
The response options are: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; and 7=very much worse.
Higher scores indicate worsening.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and 72 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2014
Study Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2014
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 15, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 15, 2013
First Posted (Estimate)
March 19, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
January 9, 2015
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 31, 2014
Last Verified
December 1, 2014
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Foot Deformities
- Acute Pain
- Hallux Valgus
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Adrenergic Agents
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Analgesics, Opioid
- Narcotics
- Neurotransmitter Uptake Inhibitors
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors
- Tapentadol
Other Study ID Numbers
- CR101093
- R331333PAI3035 (Other Identifier: Janssen-Cilag International NV)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hallux Valgus
-
Arthrex GmbHTerminated
-
Catherine Vandepitte, M.D.Pacira Pharmaceuticals, IncCompleted
-
Asklepieion Voulas General HospitalMaria Tileli; Chryssoula StaikouUnknown
-
Dr.Gerhard KaufmannMedical University InnsbruckCompletedHallux Valgus and BunionAustria
-
Chinese University of Hong KongCompletedHallux Valgus | Hallux Valgus and BunionHong Kong
-
Hospital Mutua de TerrassaUnknownHallux Valgus and Bunion (Disorder)Spain
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingHallux Valgus and Bunion
-
Cali Pharmaceuticals LLCCompletedHallux Valgus and BunionUnited States
-
Fundación Universidad Católica de Valencia San...RecruitingHallux Valgus and BunionSpain
-
Dr.Gerhard KaufmannMedical University InnsbruckCompletedHallux Valgus | Hallux Valgus InterphalangeusAustria
Clinical Trials on Tapentadol IR 50 mg
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedHallux ValgusKorea, Republic of
-
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development...Completed
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompleted
-
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development...Grünenthal GmbHCompleted
-
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development...Completed
-
Aretaieion University HospitalRecruitingPain, Postoperative | Postoperative Pain | Analgesia | Surgery | Pain, Acute | Pain, Procedural | Pain, Chronic | Pain, NeuropathicGreece
-
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development...Completed
-
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development...Grünenthal GmbHCompleted
-
Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLCGrünenthal GmbHCompleted
-
Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLCGrünenthal GmbHCompleted