Effects of a Community-based Group Rehabilitation Program for Dynamic Balance and Mobility Post Stroke

December 18, 2015 updated by: University of Manitoba

Phase 1 Study of the Effects of a Community-based Group Rehabilitation Program for Dynamic Balance and Mobility; as an Alternate to Out-patient Rehabilitation Post Stroke;

Stroke patients clearly benefit from intensive and coordinated inpatient care. While inpatient rehabilitation care is the preferred form for many patients post-stroke, due to access and financial barriers, many patients do not have this option. Community, outpatient rehabilitation programs will allow the patients with moderately disabling strokes the opportunity to maintain or augment gains achieved during inpatient stroke rehabilitation , while allowing some patients with mild disability to avoid inpatient rehabilitation completely.

Objective: Phase 1 randomized control trial to test the efficiency and effectiveness of treating adults who have suffered a single stroke using the following essential treatment components; a) community setting, b) group activity program, c) flexible, task-specific, computer-based exercise regime This program is designed to allow an extension of the in-patient rehabilitation experience to a community-based setting, in a cost-effective manner using paraprofessional staff and rehabilitation specialists, to provide a challenging, functional program to promote recovery and independence from physical impairments affecting balance and walking.

The specific objectives are to:

  1. assess the benefits and feasibility of the multi-functional group exercise intervention for balance and mobility in a community setting. Secondary objectives
  2. identify effective combinations of exercises & activities that translate to increased abilities and participation levels.

Hypothesis: Intense training targeting standing balance, and walking will significantly improve stroke clients' functional mobility. Training in a group setting and incorporating interactive and engaging computer gaming further provides the benefits of motivation and peer support while providing treatment in a cost effective manner.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3e 0T6
        • School of Medical Rehabilitation , University of Mantioba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3T 1a3
        • Riverview Health Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. community dwelling individuals, who have suffered a single stroke of thrombic -embolic or hemorrhagic origin in the last 3-12 months and are waiting for outpatient rehabilitation ,
  2. Aged 50-70 years,
  3. Montreal Cognitive Assessment score greater than 26,
  4. English-speaking and possess the ability to understand the nature of the study and provide informed consent,
  5. Independent in sit to stand transfer and ambulatory functions, with or without an assistive device (cane or walker), f ) Gait speed (average over 25 meters) between 0.3 and 0.8 m/s and Berg Balance Scale score of less than 45.

Exclusion Criteria:

Any medical condition or disability that prevents participation in an exercise program. For example, a reported medical history of current treatment for cancer, kidney disease, recent fracture, uncontrolled diabetes or seizure disorder, uncontrolled cardiovascular-related problems .

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: conventional physical Therapy
will receive a conventional out-patient program which will include: lower extremity stretching and strengthening exercise; fitness using cycle ergometer; balance exercises in standing; over ground walking and stair exercises
will receive a conventional out-patient program which will include: lower extremity stretching and strengthening exercise; fitness using cycle ergometer; balance exercises in standing; over ground walking and stair exercises
Experimental: community-based group rehabilitation

Group training will include different workstations to target dynamic standing balance and walking. The key features includes facilitate repetition of task-related movements, tailored to the patient and patient's goals, in a meaningful context. Specifically:

  • Advanced dynamic tasks, including stepping and other transitional tasks to treadmill & over ground walking) with use of various inexpensive exercise "assistive" equipment such as mini-exercise stepper or elliptical machines.
  • Treadmill walking exercise program.

Group training will include different workstations to target dynamic standing balance and walking. The key features includes facilitate repetition of task-related movements, tailored to the patient and patient's goals, in a meaningful context. Specifically:

  • Advanced dynamic tasks, including stepping and other transitional tasks to treadmill & over ground walking) with use of various inexpensive exercise "assistive" equipment such as mini-exercise stepper or elliptical machines.
  • Treadmill walking exercise program.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gait speed
Time Frame: pre and post intervention of 8 weeks
Proportion of participants with an improved functional level of walking As per LEAPS multi-centre RCT.47 Improved functional level was defined as; (a) the ability to walk independently at a speed of 0.8 m per second or faster for persons with initially moderate gait impairment , or (b) ability to walk independently at a speed of 0.4 m per second or faster for persons with initially severe gait impairment. These transitions are associated with improvements in home or community ambulation, functional status, and quality of life.50
pre and post intervention of 8 weeks
Stroke Impact Scale
Time Frame: Pre and post intervention of 8 weeks
This scale is a self reported, stroke specific, valid, reliable, and responsive measure that includes 59 items and assesses eight domains related to activities and participation.
Pre and post intervention of 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: pre and post intervention of 8 weeks
pre and post intervention of 8 weeks
Timed Up and Go Test
Time Frame: Pre and Post intervention of 8 weeks
Pre and Post intervention of 8 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6-minute wlak test
Time Frame: Pre and Post intervention of 8 weeks
Pre and Post intervention of 8 weeks
Spatial-Temporal gait variables
Time Frame: pre and post intervention of 8 weeks
. Spatial-Temporal gait parameters using instrumented walkway.56 Average walking speed (in 4 meters) mean and variance measurement (over 20 steps) will be obtained for the following parameters: swing and stance duration, single support
pre and post intervention of 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tony Szturm Szturm, PT, PhD, Faculty of Medicine University of Manitoba
  • Principal Investigator: Sepideh Pooyania, MD, Faculty of Medicine University of Manitoba

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

March 26, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 21, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sequelae of Stroke

Clinical Trials on conventional physical therapy

3
Subscribe