Hip Posterolateral Complex Strengthening in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: a Randomized Clinical Trial

November 5, 2018 updated by: Mansueto Gomes Neto, Federal University of Bahia
Chronic nonspecific low back pain is an important health condition with a high prevalence worldwide and it is associated with enormous direct and indirect costs to the society. Clinical practice guidelines show that many interventions are available to treat patients with chronic low back pain, but the vast majority of these interventions have a modest effect in reducing pain and disability. A biomechanical approach that has been raised is that a weakness of the hip abductors, extensors, and lateral rotators musculature (posterolateral complex - PLC) would lead to excessive contralateral pelvic drop during weight-bearing activities such as walking, running, climbing up or downstairs, generating an overload in the lumbar area. Although the strengthening of the hip PLC is largely used in clinical practice for treating patients with hip and knee injuries, there is still a lack of evidence regarding patients with low back pain. Therefore, questions remain about the efficacy of the hip dynamic stabilization as an additional intervention to conventional treatment in a well design trial with statistic power.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Randomised clinical trial will be held in following the recommendations of the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). Will be recruited participants of both genders, aged between 18 and 60 years, with and without chronic nonspecific low back pain for over 3 months without irradiation for lower limbs. Potential participants with chronic nonspecific low back pain will be referred by their doctors orthopedic surgeons and/or rheumatologists that will make all the assessments and routine exams, for example, Imaging tests, prescription drugs and referral to physical therapy care. The characteristics of participants will be collected through an evaluation form specially designed for this study. This assessment form will contain issues related to demographic and anthropometric data, plus information about the clinical picture of the participants, as for example the use of medications, physical activity level, educational level, prior history of back pain and duration of symptoms.The clinical outcomes will be obtained at the completion of treatment (6 weeks) and at 3, 6, and 12 months after randomization.

The data will be collected by a blinded assessor. The statistical analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principles.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

70

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Bahia
      • Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, 41950350

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Will be included 70 patients of both sexes, adults with medical diagnosis divided into two groups: Group A consisted of 35 patients use receive conventional physical therapy plus the addition of hip PLC strengthening and group B consisted of 35 patients also only use conventional physical therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Will be excluded from the study patients who have neurological or osteoarticular disease preventing the ambulation of these individuals.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Conventional physical therapy plus HPCS
Conventional physical therapy (Combination of manual therapy techniques and exercises for spinal segmental stabilization) plus the addition of hip posterolateral complex strengthening (HPCS)
Conventional physical therapy plus the addition of hip posterolateral complex strengthening
Active Comparator: Conventional physical therapy
Conventional physical therapy (Combination of manual therapy techniques and exercises for spinal segmental stabilization)
Conventional physical therapy (combination of manual therapy techniques and exercises for spinal segmental stabilization)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The numerical visual scale evaluates levels of intensity of pain perceived by the patient through a range of 11 points (ranging from 0 to 10), 0 being no pain and 10 rank as the worst pain possible. Participants will be instructed to report the level of pain intensity based on the last 7 days.
6 weeks
Disability
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Roland Morris disability questionnaire is an instrument widely used in research and clinical practice for evaluation of functional disability associated with back pain through 24 issues that describe everyday situations in which patients have difficulty to carry out due low back pain.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Strength
Time Frame: 6 weeks
A previously calibrated manual hand-held dynamometer will be used to measure maximum isometric strength of abduction and hip extension
6 weeks
Functioning (activities and participation)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The World Health Organization Disabilty Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) 2.0 is a tool developed by the World Health Organization (who) to assess the limitations in activities and participation restrictions already adapted and validated in Brazil. The WHODAS 2.0 was designed to evaluate the functionality in 6 areas of activity: cognition, mobility, self-care, interpersonal relationships, daily activities and Participation.
6 weeks
Movement analysis with a 2-D system
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The gait and step down kinematic parameters will be calculated with SIMI Reality Motion Systems. The subjects will be fitted with colors markers on the lower limbs and trunk. Our approach automatically processes video sequences gathered with a digital camera and extract the 2D joints' location and their angle trend over time. The peaks of the movements of the hip, pelvis and trunk in the frontal and sagittal planes will be evaluated and compared between groups before and after treatment.
6 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain
Time Frame: 6 months
The numerical visual scale evaluates levels of intensity of pain perceived by the patient through a range of 11 points (ranging from 0 to 10), 0 being no pain and 10 rank as the worst pain possible. Participants will be instructed to report the level of pain intensity based on the last 7 days.
6 months
Disability
Time Frame: 6 months
The Roland Morris disability questionnaire is an instrument widely used in research and clinical practice for evaluation of functional disability associated with back pain through 24 issues that describe everyday situations in which patients have difficulty to carry out due low back pain.
6 months
Functioning (activities and participation)
Time Frame: 6 months
The World Health Organization Disabilty Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) 2.0 is a tool developed by the World Health Organization (who) to assess the limitations in activities and participation restrictions already adapted and validated in Brazil. The WHODAS 2.0 was designed to evaluate the functionality in 6 areas of activity: cognition, mobility, self-care, interpersonal relationships, daily activities and Participation.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mansueto G Neto, UFBA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 7, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FUBahia LBP

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Conventional physical therapy plus HPCS

3
Subscribe