Down Syndrome Screening Based on Dried Blood Spots and Cell-free Fetal DNA (DBS&CFF)

April 18, 2013 updated by: Peking Union Medical College Hospital

A Clinical Trial to Explore a New Prenatal Screening and Diagnosis Pattern for Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities With Dried Blood Spots and Cell-free Fetal DNA.

There are 26,600 Down Syndrome newborns every year in China. The economic burden of this disease is 65,000 USD for lifetime of every patient. The common prenatal screening and diagnosis procedure for fetal chromosomal abnormalities in China is maternal serum prenatal screening in second trimester followed by amniocentesis. The detection rate of MSS is 70%-75% with 5% false positive rate. There are only 13.9% of pregnant women can receive prenatal screening testing in China. It is very urgent that we build a training system and convenient, efficient, cost-effective procedure suitable to rural China.

The use of dried blood spots (DBS) technology in conjunction with the second trimester prenatal screening protocol has been proved to be as efficient as serum screening by our previous study. Noninvasive prenatal testing that uses cell free fetal DNA (cff DNA) from the plasma of pregnant women offers a tremendous potential for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. A positive test should be followed by invasive prenatal diagnosis to confirm the test results. Cff DNA is a good supplement to the DBS technology in rural China. A combination of the two methods can increase the screening rate and accuracy without increasing the demand of amniocentesis and cytogenetic test. This procedure with adequate training system should be suitable to rural China.

Our study will build a training system for DBS and cffDNA prenatal screening procedure in Pinggu, Beijing. Two thousand pregnant women will receive prenatal screening. DBS sample will be collected in the second trimester, Cff DNA is offered to confirm the positive screening test results, and lastly amniocentesis is offered for confirmation of the test results. All of the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes will be followed. We can estimate the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of DBS followed with cff DNA screening procedure.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Goals To build a training system and DBS and cffDNA prenatal screening procedure that is suitable to rural China.

Objectives Develop a standardized prenatal screening test training program. Evaluate the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of DBS and cffDNA prenatal screening procedure in rural China.

Specific activities

  • Train the medical staff: Select two hospitals in Pinggu Village. Train all of the obstetricians and family doctors, nurses in these counties about the prenatal screening test as well as DBS and cff DNA technology. Build a series of standardized training profiles for the doctors and nurses. Evaluate the knowledge of the trained staff and compare the prenatal screening rate as well as some key health outcome variables pre and post the training.
  • collect DBS sample in the 2nd trimestaer: Two thousand pregnant women will receive prenatal screening. DBS sample together with serum screening samples will be collected in the second trimester.
  • Cff DNA for DBS high risk pregnant women: Cff DNA is offered to confirm the positive screening test results.
  • amniocentesis for Cff DNA high risk pregnant women: Amniocentesis is offered for confirmation of the test results.
  • Follpw-up the neonatal outcome: All of the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes will be followed.
  • Statistical analysis: We can estimate the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of DBS followed with cff DNA screening procedure. We can give the recommendation to the government for a potential expansion of new screening diagnosis procedure to be used in the countryside.

Analytic methods Build the database by visual Foxpro 5.0. Use the SAS9.2 software to do statistical analysis.

Expected results and products Develop standardized prenatal screening test training program for the doctors and nurses in rural China. Estimate the training outcome. Estimate the detection rate of DBS and compare with maternal serum screening test. Estimate the sensitivity of specificity of cffDNA test. Estimate the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of DBS and cff DNA screening procedure. Make sure if DBS and cffDNA is suitable to rural China and successfully decreases the birth defects.

Timetable

  • Year 1 Select the hospitals and form the contracts with local staff. Develop the training program and finish training. Evaluate the training outcome. Start to collect DBS samples followed with cffDNA. Enroll the pregnant women in the second trimester who sign the consent form.
  • Year 2 Follow-up the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Finish the statistical analysis and paper writing.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • Department of ob gyn, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

pregnant women with 15-20+6 weeks of gestation

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Single gestation;
  • Chinese natives or non-Chinese citizen of Chinese ancestry;
  • 15-20+6 weeks of gestation;
  • be able to accept follow-ups of the pregnancy outcome;
  • healthy, without other major or chronic diseases;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • N/A

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
DBS screening test
cell-free fetal DNA for Dried blood spots samples in high risk pregnant women.
cell-free fetal DNA for DBS and maternal serum screening high risk pregnant women. Comparison of multiple Down's syndrome screening tests.
maternal serum screening test
cell-free fetal DNA for maternal serum screening test samples in high risk pregnant women.
cell-free fetal DNA for DBS and maternal serum screening high risk pregnant women. Comparison of multiple Down's syndrome screening tests.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
detection rate
Time Frame: April, 2015
Detection rate of trisomy 21 based on dried blood spots and cell-free fetal DNA. Compare the detection rate of screening test on dried blood spots with maternal serum screening test.
April, 2015

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
positive predictive value and negative predictive value
Time Frame: 3 years
the number of patients can be detected in Down syn and the proportion of the actual number of cases to screening positive cases number
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Liangkun MA, MD, Peking Union Medical College

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 23, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 23, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2013

Last Verified

April 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trisomy 21

Clinical Trials on cell-free fetal DNA

3
Subscribe