Transcranial Stimulation (tDCS) For the Treatment of Neuropathic Facial Pain (TDCS)

December 9, 2015 updated by: Beth Israel Medical Center

Transcranial Stimulation (TDCS) For The Treatment of Neuropathic Facial Pain.

A study to determine if transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS, the device that regulates brain activity, can improve pain in people with neuropathic facial pain and compare which modality (inhibitory tDCS over the somatosensory cortex or excitatory tDCS over the motor cortex) can result in better pain-relief.)

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a pilot study designed to collect preliminary data on safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)to relieve pain in subjects with neuropathic facial pain,and to compare two pain-treatment tDCS modalities: inhibitory tDCS stimulation over the somatosensory cortex and excitatory tDCS over the motor cortex.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10033
        • Beth Israel Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Spontaneous facial neuropathic pain due to any of following:

    1. Trigeminal neuralgia, type 1, (TN1): facial pain of spontaneous onset with predominantly episodic pain.
    2. Trigeminal neuralgia, type 2, (TN2): facial pain of spontaneous onset with predominantly constant pain.
    3. Trigeminal neuropathic pain, (TNP): facial pain resulting from unintentional injury to the trigeminal system from facial trauma, oral surgery, ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgery, root injury from posterior fossa or skull base surgery, stroke, etc.
    4. Trigeminal deafferentation pain, (TDP): facial pain in a region of trigeminal numbness resulting from intentional injury to the trigeminal system from neurectomy, gangliolysis, rhizotomy, nucleotomy, tractotomy, or other denervating procedures.
    5. Symptomatic trigeminal neuralgia, (STN): facial pain resulting from multiple sclerosis.

    e) Postherpetic neuralgia, (PHN): facial pain resulting from trigeminal Herpes zoster (shingles) outbreak in the trigeminal distribution.

  • Pain intensity score for "worst pain in the last 24 hours" >4 on a numeric scale 0-10 at the time of enrollment and before the first stimulation of each treatment block.
  • Pain intensity score for "pain right now" >4 on a numeric scale 0-10 before the first stimulation of each block of treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled cardiovascular disease
  • Other painful conditions than neuropathic facial pain, that are not related to and can't be distinguished from the neuropathic facial pain
  • Pregnancy
  • Implanted neurostimulation devices (e.g. a spinal cord stimulator, a deep brain stimulator, etc)
  • Active illegal drug/alcohol abuse
  • Unable to follow directions or complete tools in English.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group A: Anodal tDCS
Group A will receive one block of real excitatory anodal tDCS over the motor cortex and one block of sham.
TDCS/sham will be delivered using the battery-operated device Phoresor II Auto with two saline-soaked sponge electrodes. To deliver excitatory (anodal) tDCS over the motor cortex, the main electrode will be placed over the motor cortex on the hemisphere contralateral to the major source of pain. The second electrode will be placed on the skin overlying the supraorbital region ipsilateral to the affected area. To deliver inhibitory (cathodal) tDCS, the main electrode will be placed over the somatosensory cortex on the hemisphere contralateral to the major source of pain. The second electrode will be placed on the skin overlying the supraorbital region ipsilateral to the affected area. The current will be delivered at the intensity of 2mA for 20 minutes. To deliver sham, the current will be delivered for 30 sec only to elicit tingling skin sensation but no cortical excitability changes.
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Arm B: Cathodal tDCS
Group B will receive one block of inhibitory cathodal tDCS over the somatosensory cortex and one block of sham.
TDCS/sham will be delivered using the battery-operated device Phoresor II Auto with two saline-soaked sponge electrodes. To deliver excitatory (anodal) tDCS over the motor cortex, the main electrode will be placed over the motor cortex on the hemisphere contralateral to the major source of pain. The second electrode will be placed on the skin overlying the supraorbital region ipsilateral to the affected area. To deliver inhibitory (cathodal) tDCS, the main electrode will be placed over the somatosensory cortex on the hemisphere contralateral to the major source of pain. The second electrode will be placed on the skin overlying the supraorbital region ipsilateral to the affected area. The current will be delivered at the intensity of 2mA for 20 minutes. To deliver sham, the current will be delivered for 30 sec only to elicit tingling skin sensation but no cortical excitability changes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary outcome will be a composite measure "Pain intensity/consumption of pain medication".
Time Frame: Daily from Baseline to up to 17 weeks
The washout period between phase I and phase II of the study is variable as patients have to go back to their baseline.
Daily from Baseline to up to 17 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joy Hao, MD, Beth Israel Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 9, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 10, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Facial Pain

Clinical Trials on tDCS

3
Subscribe