Analgesic Effect of Oxytocin Receptor Modulation

February 11, 2015 updated by: University Hospital Inselspital, Berne

Analgesic Effect of Oxytocin Receptor Modulation in Healthy Volunteers

Carbetocin is a synthetic analogue of the hormone Oxytocin and is routinely used in obstetric anesthesiology to control uterine bleeding after cesarean section. As an incidental finding, women who received carbetocin had less pain after cesarean section than women who had received Oxytocin. Carbetocin may therefore have an analgesic effect.

The present study examines this analgesic effect using different sensory tests, e.g. pressure, heat, cold and electrical pain before and after administration of carbetocin in healthy male volunteers. Any changes in these sensory tests might be indicative of an analgesic property of carbetocin.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background

Chronic pain is still a largely unresolved issue, causing suffering, disability and high social costs. The search for novel pharmacological targets is therefore a priority. A recent study on postpartal bleeding came to the accidental finding of a possible analgesic action of the oxytocin agonists carbetocin.

Oxytocin is a well known nonapeptide synthesized in the hypothalamus, acting as neurohormone during parturition and the milk ejection reflex. Animal studies have found that descending pathways for oxytocin synthetizing neurons project to the lamina I-II of the spinal cord, where they activate a subpopulation of glutamatergic and GABAergic interneurons. In addition to GABAergic hyperpolarisation, models of oxytocin selectively blocking A-delta and C-fibers have been published. Intrathecal administration of oxytocin prevents long-term potentiation in the dorsal horn, which is thought to be an important mechanism of enhanced central pain processing.

Antagonism to GABAergic and glycinergic neurotransmission mimics many symptoms of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. A loss of synaptic inhibition in the dorsal horn occurs in animal models of experimental pain.

Inhibitory synaptic transmission in the spinal cord dorsal horn use GABA and glycine as their principal fast neurotransmitters. Both of them open the Cl- -channels, which induce postsynaptic hyperpolarisation and impairs the propagation of excitatory potentials on dendrites of neurons. Immunofluorescence studies have revealed abundant glycinergic innervations in the dorsal horn. According to this model, inhibitory GABAergic and glycinergic interneurons in the superficial spinal dorsal horn are key components in the control of pain transmission from the periphery to the brain. The model states that a non-painful stimulation is felt as non painful as long as the synaptic GABAergic and glycinergic inhibition remains intact. A human study on GABAergic modulation of pain by benzodiazepines has been recently performed by our group and was suggestive for an analgesic action. However, these drugs cause sedation and addiction, which strongly limit their clinical usefulness. A pharmacological GABA modulation via the oxytocin receptor may be an attractive alternative, since oxytocin agonists are devoid of these side effects.

Quantitative sensory tests (QST) are used to explore the central processing of painful stimuli in healthy volunteers and patients. They are based on a multimodal and multi-tissue approach, combining different pain modalities applied to different tissues in order to gather sufficient and differentiated information about the human nociceptive system under normal and pathological conditions. QST will be our tool to characterize analgesic efficacy of carbetocin.

Objective

We will test the hypothesis that carbetocin produces analgesia in healthy volunteers, as assessed by multimodal experimental pain testing.

Methods

Intradermal capsaicin injection in the volar forearm is used to create experimental pain an hyperalgesia. The area of hyperalgesia to pinprick and brush allodynia is quantified, and pressure, heat, cold and electrical pain thresholds as well as nociceptive withdrawal reflex thresholds are assessed 30 minutes after capsaicin injection (baseline assessments). Carbetocin 0.1 mg is injected intravenously and the above measurements repeated after 10, 60 and 120 minutes. Blood samples are taken in order to investigate plasma carbetocin levels at 10, 60 and 120 minutes and genetic variants of the oxytocin receptor gene.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010 Bern
        • University Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Bern University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • male
  • pain-free
  • written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • chronic pain
  • acute pain at time of testing
  • sign or suspicion of neurological dysfunction at the tested sites
  • intake of opioids
  • intake of benzodiazepines
  • intake of antidepressants
  • intake of anticonvulsants
  • intake of any analgesic drug 48h prior to test
  • known allergy to carbetocin
  • allergy to capsaicin
  • cardiovascular disease
  • asthma bronchiale
  • migraine
  • epilepsy
  • history of liver disease
  • history of renal disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Carbetocin first
Subjects receive carbetocin 0.1 mg intravenously in the first session and placebo (NaCl 0.9%) in the second session
Carbetocin 0.1 mg single dose is intravenously administered
1ml of NaCl 0.9% is administered intravenously
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Placebo first
Subjects receive placebo (NaCl 0.9%) intravenously in the first session and carbetocin 0.1 mg in the second session
Carbetocin 0.1 mg single dose is intravenously administered
1ml of NaCl 0.9% is administered intravenously

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in intramuscular electrical pain threshold compared to baseline
Time Frame: 10, 60 and 120 minutes after carbeoticin administration
10, 60 and 120 minutes after carbeoticin administration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Capsaicin-induced area of hyperalgesia and allodynia
Time Frame: 10, 60 and 120 minutes after carbeoticin administration
10, 60 and 120 minutes after carbeoticin administration
Nociceptive withdrawal reflex thresholds of the foot
Time Frame: 10, 60 and 120 minutes after carbeoticin administration
10, 60 and 120 minutes after carbeoticin administration
Single cutaneous electrical pain thresholds
Time Frame: 10, 60 and 120 minutes after carbeoticin administration
10, 60 and 120 minutes after carbeoticin administration
Repeated cutaneous electrical pain thresholds
Time Frame: 10, 60 and 120 minutes after carbeoticin administration
10, 60 and 120 minutes after carbeoticin administration
Single intramuscular electrical pain threshold
Time Frame: 10, 60 and 120 minutes after carbeoticin administration
10, 60 and 120 minutes after carbeoticin administration
Heat pain detection threshold
Time Frame: 10, 60 and 120 minutes after carbeoticin administration
10, 60 and 120 minutes after carbeoticin administration
Heat pain tolerance threshold
Time Frame: 10, 60 and 120 minutes after carbetocin administration
10, 60 and 120 minutes after carbetocin administration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Michele Curatolo, M.D., Ph.D., University Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Inselspital Bern, Switzerland

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 7, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 12, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2015

Last Verified

February 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Carbetocin

3
Subscribe