Accuracy of a Portable International Normalized Ratio Monitor in Elderly Patients (AGINR)

April 8, 2014 updated by: University Hospital, Caen

Accuracy of a Portable International Normalized Ratio Monitor in a Population Aged 75 Years Old and Over

Oral anticoagulants vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have been used for many years in the treatment of thromboembolic disorders, which are among the most costly diseases in terms of public health resources. According to the Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (AFSSAPS), it was estimated at about 900,000 the number of patients treated with VKA in 2008 (more than 1% of the French population). VKA are at the origin of many adverse effects, given their narrow therapeutic window. They are the cause of the death of approximately 5000 patients per year. The use of this therapy is a priority axis of reflection for the Haute Autorité de Santé.

The interregion G4 (Nord Pas de Calais, Normandy, Picardy), with more than 9 million people, is particularly affected by this problem.

University hospitals of our interregion, given their very substantial regional referral activity, are actually involved in managing VKA adverse side effects.

Elderly population constitutes the majority of prescriptions. The main objective of this study is to compare INR of people older than 75 years measured by traditional method with those measured by capillary method with INRatio2 supply.

The secondary objective is to show that this measure is not affected by the presence or absence of anti-phospholipid antibodies, probably very prevalent in the elderly, as well as to test the variability of INR measurement between different hospital.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Adverse effects of oral anticoagulants (warfarin, fluindione mainly) are bleeding complications and concern 13% of hospitalizations, approximately 17,000 admissions per year. They constitute 12.3% of iatrogenic adverse effect according to the latest results of the survey conducted by the haute autorité de santé (HAS). A study realized in 2000, with 2976 patients, shows that 28.8% of patients were outside of any therapeutic range (<2 or> 4.5). In 2003, a third of french biologists had no knowledge of the indication of VKA treatment of patients at the INR measurement, and more than fifty percent in 2000. When the therapeutic range was known, the value of the INR remained outside it in 30% of cases. The median time between INR equilibration phase was 5 to 6 days, while the recommended time is 2 to 4 days. A quarter of patients in phase equilibrium treatment did not have a measure of INR at least once a month. Followed over a period of a year, patients spent 40% of the time with a value of INR outside the therapeutic range, high-risk area of recurrent thrombosis or hemorrhage. That is why they require regular monitoring of INR.

Currently, this monitoring is done through a blood sample analyzed by a laboratory according to standard techniques.

The use of the INR measurement by capillary method provides a result in less than 3 minutes. This also allows the development of different monitoring strategies. In the context of a self-monitoring measure, the patient himself performs the test using the device and therapeutic adjustment is made by the health care professional.

Data analysis by HAS showed that the use of a self-measurement device significantly improved the time spent in the therapeutic range, reduced the risk of major bleeding and the accident major thromboembolism.

The pathologies treated by VKA are more common in the elderly. They are also more vulnerable to falls, overdoses of these treatments because their pharmacokinetics is amended by polypharmacy, malnutrition, less protein binding. The relative risk of bleeding is multiplicated by two beyond 70 years. Despite the emergence of new anticoagulants in the prevention of complications of arrhythmia (this disorder affect nearly 10% of the population aged over 80 years), VKA remains prevalent because these new drugs have renal elimination that can not be monitored, and can not be dialysable, have no antidote and represent a daily cost about 30 times the VKA.

The question of the use of devices for self-measurement of INR in the elderly is particularly timely, because this population has never had, to our knowledge, a specific evaluation of this technique.

Elderly population would derive the greatest benefit of this system because it will significantly improve the time spend in the therapeutic range, and reduce the risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events in reducing INR fluctuations.

We build a multicenter study whose main objective is to demonstrate the concordance of INR measurement by the capillary way (INRatio2 ®, SAS ALERE, Jouy-en-Josas) with venous technical reference. It concerns patients older than 75 years treated with VKA and hospitalized in Internal Medicine, Geriatrics and Vascular Medicine in the fours university hospital of the G4 region. The secondary objectives are to estimate the prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies (ranging from 12 to 55% depending on the study) and their influence on the measurement of the INR by capillary method and the variability of the INR veinous measurement in function of the hospital, with a centralized INR measurement which allow to compare. 150 patients is required to perform this study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Amiens, France, 80054
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire d'Amiens
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marie-antoinette Sevestre, M.D, Ph.D
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Pierre Jouanny, M.D,Ph.D
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jean-Francois Claisse, M.D
      • Caen, France, 14000
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Caen
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • boris bienvenu, M.D,Ph.D
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • laurent Auboire, M.D
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • brigitte le mauff, M.D,Ph.D
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Pablo Descatoire, M.D
      • Lille, France, 59000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Lille
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • marc lambert, M.D,Ph.D
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Francois Puisieux, M.D,Ph.D
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Eric Boulanger, M.D,Ph.D
      • Rouen, France, 76000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Rouen
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ygal Benhamou, M.D
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jeanne Yvonne BORG, M.D,Ph.D
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Philippe Chassagne, M.D,Ph.D

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

75 years and older (OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient over 75 years
  • Recipient of the social security system
  • Patient receiving anti vitamin K treatment
  • Hospitalized in Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, Vascular Medicine
  • Having signed an informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to a digital sampling.
  • Conditions preventing the realization of INRatio2 ® test : Amputation of the extremities, trophic disorders of the extremities.
  • Concomitant use of heparin.
  • Mental or physical illness which do not permit to consent to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Not interventionnal
INR capillary measurement with INRatio 2 device antiphospholipid antibodies and lupus anticoagulant
INR capillary measurement with INRatio 2 device
Rate of antiphospholipid antibodies and lupus anticoagulant dosage A 5ml blood sample obtained by veinous punction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
INR by capillary method and INR by veinous punction
Time Frame: 24 hours

INR by the classical way (punction) and comparison with a capillary method tested here.

INR by capillary method is done immediately after inclusion. INR by veinous punction is done on the 24 hours after the inclusion.

24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference between International normalized ratio (INR) measured in a veinous blood punction and with a capillary method on the same patient and correlated to the level of phospholipid antibodies and lupus anti coagulant
Time Frame: 1 year

We want to know if the level of lupus and anti cardiolipin antibodies influence the value of INR measured by capillary method.

lupus and anti cardiolipin antibodies tubes will be frozen after punction and analysed up to 1 year after.

1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference of INR measurement by veinous method between Caen laboratory and the local center laboratory.
Time Frame: 1 year

INR of a patient will be measured in two different center (Caen is the reference center).

Blood sample will be frozen after punction and analysed up to 1 year after.

1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Boris Bienvenu, M.D,Ph.D, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Caen
  • Study Director: Jean Jacques Dutheil, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Caen
  • Study Chair: Laurent Auboire, M.D, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Caen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2014

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 29, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 9, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2014

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Blood Coagulation Disorders

Clinical Trials on INR capillary measurement with INRatio 2 device

3
Subscribe