- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02000349
Comparison of Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfers and Fresh Embryo Transfers With Whole Chromosome Analysis Using Next Generation Sequencing
November 16, 2015 updated by: Reprogenetics
The investigators propose to perform a clinical randomized trial to evaluate the effect of a frozen-thawed embryo transfer and a fresh embryo transfer on pregnancy and implantation rates; with the added benefit of a blastocyst biopsy and whole chromosome analysis by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS).
Study Overview
Detailed Description
- Fresh group: All embryos will be hatched on day 3. Patients will have hatching blastocysts (*) biopsied on day 5, analyzed by NGS, and will have one or two euploid embryo transferred on day 6, in the am. If more than two euploid blastocysts are available the one(s) to be transferred will be selected based on morphology (*). Any morulas developing to hatching blastocyst on day-6 will be also analyzed but vitrified for use in a future cycle.
- Frozen group: All embryos will be hatched on day 3. Patients will have hatching blastocysts (*) biopsied on day 5 or day 6, embryos will then be vitrified, analyzed by NGS, and will have one or two euploid embryo(s) thawed and transferred on a FET cycle, before noon. If more than two euploid blastocysts are available the one(s) to be transferred will be selected based on morphology (*).
(*) Hatching blastocysts as described by Gardner and Schoolcraft (1999):
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
186
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97210
- Reproductive Medicine Lab, LLC
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 42 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria (pre-stimulation):
- Age up to 42 years
Exclusion Criteria (pre-stimulation):
- MESA and TESE patients
- At least one partner carrier of a chromosomal abnormality
- Egg donor cycle (sperm donor is acceptable)
- Gender selection cycles
- Thaw cycles
- Any patient who cannot have a fresh embryo transfer
- FSH above 12 or AMH less than 1
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Frozen Embryo Transfer with PGD
All embryos will be hatched on day 3. Patients will have hatching blastocysts (*) biopsied on day 5 or day 6, embryos will then be vitrified, analyzed by NGS, and will have one or two euploid embryo(s) thawed and transferred on a FET cycle, before noon.
If more than two euploid blastocysts are available the one(s) to be transferred will be selected based on morphology (*).
|
PGD using Next generation sequencing
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Fresh Embryo Transfer with PGD
All embryos will be hatched on day 3. Patients will have hatching blastocysts (*) biopsied on day 5, analyzed by NGS, and will have one or two euploid embryo transferred on day 6, in the am.
If more than two euploid blastocysts are available the one(s) to be transferred will be selected based on morphology (*).
Any morulas developing to hatching blastocyst on day-6 will be also analyzed but vitrified for use in a future cycle.
|
PGD using Next generation sequencing
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Implantation rate
Time Frame: 8 weeks after replacement
|
determining whether a frozen or a fresh embryo transfer will improve implantation rate.
|
8 weeks after replacement
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Correlation of Mitochondrial DNA and implantation
Time Frame: When a fetal heartbeat is detected (8 weeks after implantation)
|
The second aim of this study is to determine retrospectively if mt DNA content is linked to implantation potential and if that is measurable by NGS.
NGS provides the additional advantage that it can measure mitochondrial DNA, which it's content, seems to be inversely correlated with implantation (Fragouli et al 2013, ASRM).
|
When a fetal heartbeat is detected (8 weeks after implantation)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Zaat T, Zagers M, Mol F, Goddijn M, van Wely M, Mastenbroek S. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 4;2:CD011184. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011184.pub3.
- Sagoskin AW, Levy MJ, Tucker MJ, Richter KS, Widra EA. Laser assisted hatching in good prognosis patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2007 Feb;87(2):283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1498. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
- Ata B, Kaplan B, Danzer H, Glassner M, Opsahl M, Tan SL, Munne S. Array CGH analysis shows that aneuploidy is not related to the number of embryos generated. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Jun;24(6):614-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Feb 25.
- Cohen J, DeVane GW, Elsner CW, Kort HI, Massey JB, Norbury SE. Cryopreserved zygotes and embryos and endocrinologic factors in the replacement cycle. Fertil Steril. 1988 Jul;50(1):61-7. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60009-2.
- Cohen J, Wells D, Munne S. Removal of 2 cells from cleavage stage embryos is likely to reduce the efficacy of chromosomal tests that are used to enhance implantation rates. Fertil Steril. 2007 Mar;87(3):496-503. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1516. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
- De Vos A, Staessen C, De Rycke M, Verpoest W, Haentjens P, Devroey P, Liebaers I, Van de Velde H. Impact of cleavage-stage embryo biopsy in view of PGD on human blastocyst implantation: a prospective cohort of single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod. 2009 Dec;24(12):2988-96. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep251. Epub 2009 Sep 21.
- Fragouli E, Spath K, Alfarawati S, Wells D (2013) Quantification of mitochondrial DNA predicts the implantation potential of chromosomally normal embryos. Fertil Steril, in press (ASRM abstract)
- Gardner DK and Schoolcraft WB. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D. eds. Towards Reproductive Certainty: Fertility and Genetics Beyond 1999. Carnforth, Parthenon Publishin, 1999, 378-88
- Gutierrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sanchez-Garcia J, Escudero T, Prates R, Ketterson K, Wells D, Munne S. Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 1;95(3):953-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.010. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
- Hodes-Wertz B, Grifo J, Ghadir S, Kaplan B, Laskin CA, Glassner M, Munne S. Idiopathic recurrent miscarriage is caused mostly by aneuploid embryos. Fertil Steril. 2012 Sep;98(3):675-80. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.025. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
- Munne S, Wells D, Cohen J. Technology requirements for preimplantation genetic diagnosis to improve assisted reproduction outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jul;94(2):408-30. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.091. Epub 2009 May 5.
- SART (2011): https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=0
- Coates A, Kung A, Mounts E, Hesla J, Bankowski B, Barbieri E, Ata B, Cohen J, Munne S. Optimal euploid embryo transfer strategy, fresh versus frozen, after preimplantation genetic screening with next generation sequencing: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2017 Mar;107(3):723-730.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.022. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
September 1, 2013
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
December 1, 2015
Study Completion (Anticipated)
December 1, 2016
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 19, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 26, 2013
First Posted (Estimate)
December 4, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
November 17, 2015
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 16, 2015
Last Verified
November 1, 2015
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Reprogenetics-3.117
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Infertility
-
Assuta Hospital SystemsMaccabi Healthcare Services, IsraelCompletedInfertility, Female Infertility, Male InfertilityIsrael
-
Radboud University Medical CenterZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and DevelopmentCompletedPregnancy | Male Infertility | Female InfertilityNetherlands
-
Sapientiae InstituteTerminated
-
Esraa Gamal AhmedAin Shams Maternity HospitalUnknownUnexplained Female Infertility
-
King's College LondonNot yet recruitingInfertility | Infertility, Female | Infertility Unexplained | Infertility of Tubal Origin
-
Gazi UniversityCompletedMale Infertility | Unexplained Infertility
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesWithdrawnUterine Diseases | Endometriosis | Infertility Unexplained | Endometrial Diseases | Infertility; Female, NonimplantationUnited States
-
University of WashingtonEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedMale Infertility, AzoospermiaUnited States
-
Pacific Fertility CenterTerminatedPrimary Female Infertility | Secondary Female Infertility
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)RecruitingInfertility | Sexual Dysfunction | Infertility, Male | Nurse's Role | Sexuality | Infertility; FemaleTurkey
Clinical Trials on PGD
-
Reproductive Medicine Associates of New JerseyCompleted
-
Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI VALENCIACompleted
-
ReprogeneticsMcGill University; Yale University; Reprogenetics, Livingston, NJ; Long Island... and other collaboratorsSuspendedInfertility | Recurrent Pregnancy LossUnited States
-
University of AarhusRecruiting
-
Universitair Ziekenhuis BrusselUnknown
-
Reproductive Medicine Associates of New JerseyCompletedInfertilityUnited States
-
University of AarhusColumbia University; University of Southern Denmark; Utrecht UniversityCompleted
-
Reproductive Medicine Associates of New JerseyCompleted
-
ReprogeneticsMain Line Fertility CenterUnknownInfertility | Recurrent Pregnancy LossUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentUniversity of UtahRecruiting