A Multicenter Single-blind Comparison Between Standard and Individualized Approach in Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy

January 26, 2016 updated by: dr. Theodor Alexandru Voiosu, Clinical Hospital Colentina

A Comparison of Bowel Prep Quality and Patient Satisfaction in Outpatients Undergoing Colonoscopy Preparation With Either a Standard Bowel Preparation or an Individualized Approach Using Sodium Picosulphatge/Magnesium Citrate or 4L Polyethylene Glycol Preparation Regimens

This study aims to compare a standard approach to bowel preparation for colonoscopy (using sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate or 4lPEG) to an individualized approach where patients are assigned a specific regimen of either sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate or 4lPEG depending on patient-related factors. The study aims to compare patient-related outcomes such as comfort levels during bowel cleansing and physician-related outcomes such as bowel prep quality in the two study groups.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

185

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bucharest, Romania, 020125
        • Colentina Clinical Hospital
      • Cluj, Romania
        • Institutul Regional de Gastroenterologie si Hepatologie prof. dr. Octavin Fodor
      • Cluj, Romania
        • Spitalul CFR

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all patients > 18 years of age undergoing elective colonoscopy on an outpatient basis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refusal to sign informed consent
  • pregnancy
  • advance kidney, liver or heart disease
  • suspicion of malignant / benign stenosis of the digestive tract

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard approach

patients will be randomized to one of the 2 currently used bowel preparation regimens in our clinic:

  • 4L split polyethylene glycol solution
  • split magnesium citrate/sodium picosulphate preparation regimen
bowel cleansing with either 4L PEG or sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate
Experimental: Individualized approach
patients will receive either the 4L split polyethylene glycol bowel prep regimen or the sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate split prep regimen according to personal characteristics assessed using a self-administered questionnaire (including bowel habits, the preference for large-volume preparation and education level)
Other Names:
  • 4 L polyethylene glycol or sodium picosulphate / magnesium citrate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
bowel cleansing
Time Frame: 24 hours
bowel cleansing as assessed during colonoscopy using 2 assessment scales (Boston bowel prep scale, and a 1-4 semiquantitative scale)
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient comfort level during bowel cleansing
Time Frame: 24 hours
patient pain levels on a 0-10 visual analogue scale during the bowel cleansing process
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Theodor Voiosu, MD, PhD, Clinical Hospital Colentina

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 31, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 27, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colonoscopy

Clinical Trials on Standard approach

3
Subscribe