Coronary Artery Disease Screening in Kidney Transplant Candidates (CADScreening)

February 4, 2020 updated by: John Gill, University of British Columbia

Pilot Study to Determine Feasibility of a Randomized Trial of Screening for Coronary Artery Disease in Kidney Transplant Candidates

Kidney transplant candidates are at very high risk for coronary artery disease (CAD). The optimal strategy to monitor and maintain the cardiac fitness of patients awaiting kidney transplantation is unknown. Currently patients undergo annual testing; however, screening for CAD may increase morbidity and mortality by:

  1. exposing patients to the risk of angiography and revascularization procedures
  2. delaying or excluding patients from life saving transplantation.

Before proceeding with a definitive study to determine whether screening is necessary, feasibility will be determined in this pilot study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This pilot trial will determine the feasibility of a multi-center, randomized, parallel group definitive trial. Asymptomatic wait-listed patients will be randomized to routine screening for coronary artery disease (CAD) (i.e. Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy (MPS) or Dobutamine Stress Echo (DSE)) as per the current standard of care versus selective screening based on symptoms. Patients enrolled in the pilot will be included in the definitive trial analysis. The pilot trial will include four Canadian centres. The definitive trial will aim to determine if a strategy of selective use of screening tests (i.e. Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy or Dobutamine Stress Echo) only in the presence of symptoms (i.e. chest pain, dyspnea etc) is non-inferior with respect to the composite endpoint of non-fatal MI and cardiac death compared to screening all asymptomatic wait-listed patients at regular intervals as described in transplant specific guidelines published by the National Kidney Foundation.

Currently there is no strong evidence for or against using routine cardiac screening of asymptomatic transplant patients, more evidence based randomized clinical trials are needed. This need is further highlighted by a number of factors such as: wait-listed patients are increasing in number and medical complexity; longer wait times and changing donor characteristics can increase CAD risk; wait-listed patients are at high risk for CAD but are commonly asymptomatic; the standard of care is not evidence based and is expensive; the current standard may be harmful. The study will determine feasibility of a definitive trial through the measures outlined under 'Outcome Measures'.

End stage renal disease (ESRD) patients wait-listed for kidney transplantation will be randomized to undergo selective screening for CAD, in which patients are only screened if they develop symptoms suggestive of CAD or the current standard of care that involves regular screening for CAD at fixed time intervals based on the presence of risk factors. Patients will remain on the pilot trial protocol until death, non-fatal MI, transplantation, permanent removal from the waiting list for any reason, or 24 months after enrolment in the pilot trial. During wait-listing, follow-up telephone interviews and chart reviews will be performed every six months. After transplantation, an in-person follow up visit and chart review will occur at the time of discharge from hospital, and a telephone interview and chart review will be performed 3 months after transplantation. Patients will be followed for 24 months from the date of enrolment. Patients who receive a kidney transplant during the study will be followed for 27 months.

For the pilot trial, descriptive analyses are planned. Feasibility will be summarized with proportions, rates, means, and medians as appropriate. Comparison of the definitive trial outcomes between treatment groups, will not be done at the end of the internal pilot as these patients will be included in the definitive trial. Analyses of enrolment rates and consent rates will be done after the enrolment phase of the pilot trial in late 2014. An interim analysis of protocol adherence is planned in mid 2016 in support of the definitive trial funding application in September, 2016.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

144

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
        • Vancouver General Hospital
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
        • St. Paul's Hospital
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 4A6
        • St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
        • The Ottawa Hospital
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • University Health Network
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Royal Victoria Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age greater than 18 years
  • active on the deceased donor transplant waiting list

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients not expected to require further screening for CAD prior to transplantation by the current standard of care. For example, a diabetic patient recently screened for CAD and expected to be transplanted <12 months from the start of the study would not require further screening according to current guidelines and would be ineligible
  • patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of active cardiac disease such as unstable coronary syndromes, de-compensated heart failure, uncontrolled arrhythmia, and severe valvular heart disease
  • patient who have been put "on hold" for transplantation due to a medical problem (e.g. an infection)
  • prior extra-renal transplant recipients
  • multi-organ transplant candidates (e.g. kidney pancreas transplant candidates)
  • patients with a planned living donor transplant
  • patients unable to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Selective Screening
Patients randomized to selective-use of screening tests will not routinely undergo Myocardial Perfusion Scintography or Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography. If patients develop symptoms of CAD at any time, they will undergo investigations as per the usual standard of care.
Patients randomized to selective-use of screening tests will not routinely undergo Myocardial Perfusion Scintography or Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography. If patients develop symptoms of CAD at any time, they will undergo investigations as per the usual standard of care.
No Intervention: Regular Screening
Patients randomized to regular screening will be tested as per the current standard described in guidelines published by the National Kidney Foundation (e.g. annually while wait-listed for transplantation). If patients develop symptoms of CAD at any time, they will undergo investigations as per the usual standard of care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Adhering to the Expected Number of Screening Tests
Time Frame: Up to 27 months
Adherence will be defined by completion of the expected number of screening tests during follow up as per the 2005 National Kidney Foundation guidelines. For example, the expected number of screening tests in a diabetic patient who did not develop symptoms would be zero in the selective screening group, while the same patient would be expected to completed two screening tests if randomized to regular screening. Tests performed for clinical symptoms of CAD will be excluded from the determination of adherence.
Up to 27 months
Enrolment Rates
Time Frame: Measured after enrolment period of 6 months
The total number of subjects enrolled across all sites will be monitored monthly from the CRO, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI), which issues the randomization scheme.
Measured after enrolment period of 6 months
Consent Rate
Time Frame: Measured after enrolment period of 6 months
The percentage of patients willing to participate will be established at each site. Willingness to enrol in the study will be recorded on each patient's case report form along with the reason for any refusal to consent.
Measured after enrolment period of 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Cardiac Events
Time Frame: Up to 27 months
A composite outcome of cardiac death and non-fatal myocardial infarction will be looked at and adjudicated by a blinded clinical endpoints committee.
Up to 27 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Transplant Events
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Patient transplantation will be documented on the subject case report form.
Up to 24 months
Number of Participants With Wait List Holds or Removals
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Indication for hold or removal will be measured as well.
Up to 24 months
Number of Health Care Encounters
Time Frame: Up to 27 months
The information captured will include outpatient, day care, and emergency room use (including any diagnostic testing and all medical and surgical interventions (i.e. use of thrombolytics, revascularization procedures), inpatient encounters and resource utilization (hospitalizations, procedural costs), physician consultations. Indirect patients costs (time off work, transportation costs), and quality of life (measured using the short-form 36 (SF36).
Up to 27 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Gill, MD, St. Paul's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

March 10, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Selective Screening

3
Subscribe