Comparative Effectiveness of Primary Care-based Interventions for Pediatric ADHD

November 6, 2015 updated by: Nerissa Bauer, Indiana University

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common neurobehavioral disorder of childhood, affecting approximately 8% of youth. Children with ADHD often have problems sustaining attention and completing multi-step commands and tasks of daily living, such as homework. Pediatricians are often the first physicians to identify problems with children's functioning at home and at school. However, because of limited visit time, pediatricians often struggle with managing ADHD while trying to also cover a vast array of other primary care issues. Moreover, as there is a nationwide shortage of pediatric mental health specialists and access to parenting programs is limited, a critical need exists to develop interventions that form partnerships between behavioral and mental health specialists and the primary care pediatrician. One approach is to base interventions in the pediatric clinic to ensure children have access to appropriate treatment. Thus far, only a limited number of sites have this pediatric-mental health partnership.

Health information technology (HIT) has been used to enhance primary care management of ADHD. HIT can improve pediatricians' ability not only to adhere to recommended guidelines, but also to screen for co-existing disorders and provide timely parental education. An alternative strategy might be to use group visits (GV). GV afford more time with families and allows the pediatrician to facilitate more in-depth discussions. More importantly, the group model allows parents to learn from one another, normalizes parenting expectations, and addresses shared experiences of medication side effects and other factors related to adherence. Moreover, a group visit can be conducted in a physical location, such as the pediatric clinic, or be brought into the virtual world with the aid of social media. Virtual support groups for chronic care diseases have become an increasingly popular way for a community of individuals to exchange information and offer emotional support.

Prior to the adoption of these interventions into primary care practice, investigators must know which is best. Rigorous comparative effectiveness research (CER) can help to determine this. This proposal will compare a HIT based intervention to a GV strategy, with and without the use of social media. These 3 interventions will be compared based not only on clinical measures of interest but also on parent-defined patient outcomes. Prior research has largely focused on measuring clinical outcomes such as treatment adherence and ADHD symptom reduction with little emphasis on understanding how patient-centered outcomes, such as the quality of life of families dealing with ADHD, are affected.

Building on previous work, the specific aims for this study are:

Aim 1. Compare the preliminary efficacy of three interventions to improve treatment of ADHD in the primary care setting Aim 1a) Compare the effectiveness of the three interventions on clinical measures such as parent and teacher rated ADHD symptoms and adaptive functioning Aim 1b) Compare the effectiveness of the three interventions on patient-centered outcomes such as quality of life and parental satisfaction with the intervention The three interventions will be: 1) Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) which is the health information technology innovation arm; 2) Group visits (GV); or 3) Group visits plus online discussion portal (GV+DP).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

81

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • General Pediatrics Clinic Medical Service Area 1 in Riley Hospital for Children at IU Health
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46208
        • Eskenazi Health Center-Blackburn
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46226
        • Eskenazi Health Center- Forest Manor
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46254
        • Eskenazi Health Center-W. 38th Street
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46268
        • Eskenazi Health Center- Pecar

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children 6 to 12 years of age with diagnosis of ADHD and their parents
  • Children must receive medical care at participating study clinics
  • Children must have diagnosis of ADHD based on parent and teacher diagnostic and statistical manual-IV rating scales
  • Children can have co-existing Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with co-existing diagnosis of Conduct Disorder (CD)
  • Children with autism
  • Children with moderate to severe mental handicap or other neurodevelopment disorder that would preclude active participation in group discussions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Computer Decision Support
ADHD Module of the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) system Designed to facilitate physician adherence to clinical care guidelines for ADHD identification and chronic care management
ADHD Module of the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) system Designed to facilitate physician adherence to clinical care guidelines for ADHD identification and chronic care management
Active Comparator: ADHD Group visits
Parents and children attend separate but concurrently run group visits every three months; groups are facilitated by general pediatricians
Parents and children attend separate but concurrently run group visits every three months; groups are facilitated by general pediatricians
Active Comparator: ADHD Group Visits plus Online Discussion Portal
Parents and children attend separate but concurrently run group visits every three months; groups are facilitated by general pediatricians. Online discussion portal access granted to parent participants and will allow parents to communicate with each other in between in-person group visits
Parents and children attend separate but concurrently run group visits every three months; groups are facilitated by general pediatricians. Parent participants will be granted access to the online discussion portal to allow for communication in between in-person group visits.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Vanderbilt ADHD Rating Scale scores
Time Frame: Baseline & 12 months
ADHD symptoms as measured by parent-report and based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV diagnostic criteria.
Baseline & 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in scores for pediatric quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline & 12 months
Quality of Life (generic core scales): 23 items, related to quality of life and child's needs in context of the family. Parent and child report.
Baseline & 12 months
Change in score of multidimensional scale of perceived social support scale
Time Frame: Baseline & 12 months
Social Support: 12-items perceptions on support
Baseline & 12 months
Parental Locus of Control-Short Form
Time Frame: Baseline
Locus of Control: 25-items, degree parent feels in control of child behavior
Baseline
Change in scores related to adaptive functioning
Time Frame: Baseline & 12 months
13 items, parent-report, measuring adaptive functioning in the home using the Home Situations Questionnaire. Responses at each separate time point will be compared to the study specific Childhood ADHD and Family Impact Scale scores for correlation.
Baseline & 12 months
Change in scores on Childhood ADHD & Family Impact Scale
Time Frame: Baseline & 12 months
Study-specific tool, 9 items related to common challenges related to parenting based on feedback by patient advisory board
Baseline & 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Demographics
Time Frame: Baseline
Study-specific tool,12 items capturing demographics & characteristics of participant
Baseline
Satisfaction with content of group visits
Time Frame: Every 3 months at the end of each attended group visit
Separate forms for parent and child feedback on group visits (5-6 items, 1 page); subjects in GV or GV-DP only
Every 3 months at the end of each attended group visit
Pediatric facilitator feedback form
Time Frame: Every 3 months at the end of each attended group visit
Parent ratings of communication, teaching style and preparedness of pediatric facilitator; subjects in GV or GV-DP only
Every 3 months at the end of each attended group visit
Discussion portal feedback form
Time Frame: 12 months
Closed and open ended questions about: if parent accessed the online discussion portal (yes/no), how often accessed (daily/weekly/monthly/never), perceived benefits of the online discussion portal, any suggestions for usefulness; subjects in GV-DP only
12 months
Adherence to ADHD Group Visit curriculum
Time Frame: Every month for 15 months
Protocol checklist for each session to be completed by facilitators after each session and by study team to monitor adherence; facilitators and study team only
Every month for 15 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nerissa S Bauer, MD, MPH, Indiana University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

April 7, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 9, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Clinical Trials on Computer Decision Support

3
Subscribe