An RCT of Bariatric Surgery vs a Community Weight Loss Programme for the Sustained Treatment of IIH (IIH:WT)

November 3, 2020 updated by: Dr Alexandra Sinclair, University of Birmingham

A Randomised Controlled Trial of Bariatric Surgery Versus a Community Weight Loss Programme for the Sustained Treatment of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: the IIH:WT Trial

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a condition with an unknown cause or causes. The condition is associated with raised pressure in the brain and can cause disabling daily headaches and loss of sight, which can be permanent. The raised brain pressure squashes the nerves supplying the eye (also known as papilloedema) and this can affect vision. Over 90% of patients with IIH are overweight and weight loss is the most effective treatment. Other treatments for IIH have very little current evidence to support their use.

Weight loss is difficult to maintain. This trial aims to compare two methods of weight loss, bariatric surgery and the most effective dietary programme commonly available, Weight Watchers, to see which offers the most effective sustainable treatment for IIH. Bariatric surgery is recommended by the NICE clinical guidelines for patients with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of over 40, or over 35 with a co-morbidity. Women suffering from IIH have a BMI on average around 38 and IIH is not recognised as a co-morbidity for bariatric surgery.

This trial will recruit 64 women with IIH from Neurology and Ophthalmology clinics in UK NHS Trusts. They will be randomised and 32 participants will be allocated to the dietetic intervention arm, and be enrolled in their local Weight Watchers group. 32 participants will be allocated to the bariatric surgery arm, and will be referred to their local bariatric surgery pathway to receive bariatric surgery. Both groups of participants will be allocated to a treatment arm which is proven to bring about weight loss.

Participants will then be followed up for five years, with the most important measurement being their brain pressure after one year of being in the trial.

A further 20 obese women who don't suffer from IIH will be recruited to compare the baseline symptoms and biomarkers of those with IIH; they will take no further part in the study. 5 further healthy individuals will be scanned twice in an MRI test group to validate the MRI scan sequence to be used in the trial.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • West Midlands
      • Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom, B15 2TH
        • University Hospital Birmingham (Queen Elizabeth Hospital)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Female IIH patients aged between 18 and 55 years, diagnosed according to the modified Dandy criteria who have chronic (> 6 months duration), active disease (papilloedema [Frisen grade ≥ 1], significantly raised ICP > 25cmH2O) and no evidence of venous sinus thrombosis (magnetic resonance or CT imaging and venography as noted at diagnosis).
  2. BMI >35kg/m2.
  3. Tried other appropriate non-surgical treatments to lose weight but have not been able to achieve or maintain adequate, clinically beneficial weight loss for at least 6 months.
  4. Able to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age less than 18 or older than 55 years.
  2. Pregnant or planning to conceive during the first 18 months of the trial .
  3. Significant co-morbidity, endocrinopathy or the use of hormone manipulating medication (excluding contraception and topical or inhaled steroids).
  4. Undergone optic nerve sheath fenestration.
  5. Definite indication for or contraindication against surgery or dieting.
  6. Have a specific medical or psychiatric contraindication for surgery, including drug misuse, eating disorder or major depression (suicidal ideation, drug overdose or psychological admission in last 12 months).
  7. Previous bariatric surgery.
  8. Taken AZD4017 within the last four months .
  9. Inability to give informed consent e.g. due to cognitive impairment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Dietetic Intervention
Participants randomised to the dietetic arm will be given vouchers at baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months that exempt them from paying for consecutive and specified weeks of their local Weight Watchers diet programme.
Participants randomised to the dietetic arm will be given vouchers at baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months that exempt them from paying for consecutive and specified weeks of their local Weight Watchers.
Other Names:
  • Weight Watchers
Experimental: Bariatric surgery
Patients randomised to the bariatric surgery arm will be referred to the bariatric surgery pathway and, if judged suitable according to the bariatric surgery clinic's screening processes, undergo bariatric surgery.
Participants randomised to the bariatric surgery arm of the trial will be referred to the surgery pathway according to NICE guidelines at Birmingham Heartlands Hospital (BHH), Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust.
No Intervention: Matched obese control group
To evaluate the baseline difference in ICP between IIH patients and a matched obese control cohort we will recruit 20 obese but otherwise healthy participants who will undergo the same baseline visit as the main trial participants and then exit the study.
No Intervention: MRI Test run
5 patients will undergo double baseline MR scans to validate the novel MR sequences being used in the main trial.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intracranial Pressure
Time Frame: 12 months

Change in Intracranial Pressure (ICP) between baseline and 12 months.

ICP will be assessed using lumbar puncture (LP). To avoid the LP affecting the visual measures it will be performed after the visual tests have been completed. ICP will be recorded to the nearest whole number in cmH2O. Both opening and closing ICP will be recorded.

12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intracranial Pressure
Time Frame: 60 months

Change in ICP between baseline and 24 and 60 months.

ICP will be assessed using lumbar puncture (LP). To avoid the LP affecting the visual measures it will be performed after the visual tests have been completed. ICP will be recorded to the nearest whole number in cmH2O. Both opening and closing ICP will be recorded.

60 months
IIH symptoms
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in reported IIH symptoms from 0 to 12 months (and at 3, 6, 24 and 60 months)
12 months
Visual function
Time Frame: 12 months

Change in visual function from 0 to 12 months (and at 24 and 60 months).

Assessments to be undertaken are the LogMAR (log of the minimum angle of resolution) chart to assess visual acuity, automated perimetry (Humphrey 24-2 central threshold) to measure the visual field mean deviation, an evaluation of contrast sensitivity and an Ishihara book to assess colour vision. The pupils will then be dilated using 1% tropicamide. Papilloedema will then be measured using spectral optical coherence tomography. Papilloedema will be further graded following fundus photographs. This will be done after all participants have reached the primary endpoint by two neuro-ophthalmologists blinded to trial treatment arm. The assessors will score the paired papilloedema images as better/same/worse as per the methodology described in a previous study. They will also assign a Frisen score to the images.

12 months
Papilloedema
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in papilloedema from 0 to 12 months (and at 24 and 60 months)
12 months
Headache
Time Frame: 12 months

Change in headache associated disability from 0 to 12 months (and at 24 and 60 months).

Headache will be assessed by participant completed questionnaires. Participants will complete a daily headache diary in the week before assessments, which will evaluate the Headache Index score and use of analgesia (days/week). Headache associated disability will be evaluated using the Headache Impact Test-6 score (HIT 6). Severity and frequency of headaches will be assessed retrospectively using the Headache Index. Headache phenotype (according to criteria from the International Headache Society) will also be assessed.

12 months
Anthropometric measures
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in anthropometric measures (e.g. waist, hip, fat mass) from 0 to 12 months (and at 24 and 60 months)
12 months
Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L and SF-36)
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in quality of life (participant reported) from 0 to 12 months (and at 24 and 60 months)
12 months
Referrals to CSF shunting procedures and optic nerve sheath fenestration
Time Frame: 12 months
Difference in number of referrals to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting procedures and optic nerve sheath fenestration between treatment arms at 0 to 12 months (and at 24 and 60 months)
12 months
Health Economics
Time Frame: 12 months
Health economics including cost-effectiveness at 12, 24 and 60 months.
12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biomarkers
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in biomarkers from 0 to 12 (and 24 and 60) months
12 months
Matched control group comparison
Time Frame: Baseline
Comparison between IIH patients and the matched control group at baseline with respect to biomarkers and ICP.
Baseline
MRI Test Run
Time Frame: Baseline
Change in MR imaging over a double baseline period of healthy controls.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alexandra Sinclair, MBChB, University of Birmingham

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 6, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 2, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 2, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

April 28, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RG_12-089
  • CS-011-028 (Other Grant/Funding Number: NIHR)
  • 14/WM/0011 (Other Identifier: Black Country Research Ethics Committee)
  • ISRCTN40152829 (Registry Identifier: ISRCTN)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Dietetic intervention

3
Subscribe