Topical Imiquimod vs. LEEP for Women With Carcinoma In-situ of the Cervix

Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial of Non-inferiority of Topical Imiquimod vs. LEEP for Women With Carcinoma In-situ of the Cervix

OBJECTIVE: The standard of care for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 to 3 (CIN 2-3) has been the excision of the cervical transformation zone by way of a loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) or cold knife conization (CKC). However, it has been recognized that these procedures can increase the risks for pre-term labor in women who still desire to conceive. Recent studies have shown that medical treatment with Imiquimod, a topical immune response modulator, has significant effects on histological regression of CIN 2-3 when compared with placebo. The investigators propose that treatment with Imiquimod may be preferable offering similar outcomes on histological regression when compared with excision or ablation while potentially avoiding or reducing the number of surgical procedure that places them at risk for future pregnancies.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
• Intervention / Treatment: Procedure: Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure; Drug: Imiquimod

Detailed Description

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial of patients with CIN 2-3 to receive either surgical excision with LEEP or CKC versus medical therapy with Imiquimod once weekly inserted vaginally for 16 weeks. Inclusion criteria are women age 21 years or older with confirmed histological diagnosis of CIN 2-3 with a normal endocervical curettage (ECC) if obtained and satisfactory colposcopy (the transformation zone of the cervix was completely visualized.) Exclusion criteria include positive CIN2-3 on ECC, presence of cancer, pregnancy or lactation, immune deficiency, hepatitis, or hypersensitivity to Imiquimod. Patients will be randomized to receive excision with LEEP/CKC or Imiquimod 250 mg (5%) cream (12.5 mg of active ingredient) inserted vaginally once a week for 16 weeks.

The primary outcome will be histological regression to CIN 1 or less. Secondary outcomes will be complete histological regression, high-risk Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) clearance, Clearance of HPV 16, 18/45, and patient tolerance of Imiquimod regimen. Follow up with repeat pap, HPV typing to include 16 and 18/45 subtyping, and colposcopy with directed cervical biopsy will be performed at 6 months post initiation of treatment. Patients unable to complete at least 8 treatments and miss two treatments consecutively will be considered failures and offered immediate LEEP. Those patients that complete 8 treatments of Imiquimod will be reevaluated 6 months from initiating treatment. Demographic information will be obtained to include age, gravidity and parity, smoking history, and contraceptive use.

Descriptive statistics will include numbers and rates of occurrence with confidence intervals of regression, pre, and post-treatment HPV including HPV 16 and 18/45 typing, and adverse effects. The assumed regression rate for the LEEP arm varies within studies. We are choosing a conservative estimate of 85% regression rate from CIN2+ to CIN1 or less. More recently in a 2014 publication in the Journal of Virology (Author Antonio Frega, Journal of Clinical Virology 60 (2014) 39-43) 13% of the LEEP patients out of 475 had residual disease after LEEP. In this study they excluded the 10% of patients that had had positive margins on their LEEP specimen. We are not excluding them as this is intent to treat study. For Imiquimod the Grimm study found a 73.3% regression rate with those treated with the active ingredient. A non-inferiority-type design for two proportions using differences is used in which the difference between treatments is defined as medical treatment being preferable if the regression rate is not more than 15% below that of the excisional treatment. Comparison of the regression rates of the two treatments will be made by a non-inferiority Fisher's exact test.

Required sample size was assessed using the PASS software of the NCSS statistical package. Using power = 0.80 and alpha = 0.05, a power analysis predicts the need for 68 patients per arm for 136. Post-treatment HPV rates will be compared similarly. We will recruit 75 patients to each arm to buffer for a dropout rate.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 22
• Phase: Phase 2; Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • California
    • San Diego, California, United States, 92134-5000
      • Naval Medical Center San Diego

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Healthy women older than age 21, military or civilian
• Negative pregnancy test results
• Confirmed CIN 2-3 on cervical biopsy with a negative endocervical curettage (ECC) and satisfactory colposcopy visualizing the complete transformation zone of the cervix.
• The patient will be available and in the San Diego area for 6 months after enrollment to complete the clinic visits and follow up.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Positive CIN 2-3 on ECC
• Presence of cancer
• Pregnancy or lactation
• Immuno-compromised (systemic lupus erythematosus, kidney transplant)
• Hepatitis
• Hypersensitivity to Imiquimod
• Ulcerative colitis
• Crohn's disease
• Human Immunodeficiency virus

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure; Excision of the cervical transformation zone by way of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) or cold knife conization (CKC).	Procedure: Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure; Patients with CIN 2-3 will be randomized to receive intervention, CKC or LEEP versus medical therapy with Imiquimod.; Other Names: LEEP
Experimental: Imiquimod; Imiquimod 12.5mg intravaginally once weekly for 16 weeks	Drug: Imiquimod; 12.5mg (5%) once a week vaginally for 16 weeks; Other Names: Aldara

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Human Papillomavirus(HPV) Clearance	HPV clearance will be determined by pathology and HPV testing, followed by colposcopy. Descriptive statistics will include numbers and rates of occurrence with confidence intervals of regression, pre and post-treatment HPV including Human Papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) and HPV 18/45 typing, and adverse effects. A non-inferiority type design is used in which the difference between treatments is defined as medical treatment being preferable if the regression rate is not more than 10% below that of the excisional treatment. Comparison of the regression rates of the two treatments will be made by a non-inferiority Fisher's exact test.	6 months from treatment initiation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Evidence of local or systemic side effects of Imiquimod cream	Patients will be seen in dysplasia clinic at Naval Medical Center San Diego (NMCSD) every 4 weeks while in treatment to determine tolerability of the Imiquimod Arm. Patients with significant symptoms will be asked to delay using Imiquimod until symptoms resolve before resuming. Patients unable to complete at least 4 weeks of treatment (1 treatment per week), will be offered immediate LEEP or surveillance at the 6 month follow up.	Every 4 weeks after initiation of Imiquimod Arm for 16 weeks
Evidence of local or systemic side effects of Imiquimod cream	Patients will be provided a daily phone number to a qualified nurse regarding any symptoms experienced while on the Imiquimod arm of the study. Patients will be instructed to be evaluated in the Emergency Department after clinic hours if needed for up to 6 months after study initiation.	Daily after initiation of Imiquimod treatment Arm, up to 6 months after study initiation
Number of Participants with Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events	All reported Adverse Events will be captured on the Adverse Event report.	Up to 6 months after study initiation

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Addie N Alkhas, MD, United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: February 1, 2015
• Primary Completion (Actual): December 21, 2016
• Study Completion (Actual): May 9, 2017

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: April 24, 2014
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 1, 2014
• First Posted (Estimate): May 5, 2014

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): June 27, 2017
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 23, 2017
• Last Verified: June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Imiquimod
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Neoplasms by Histologic Type; Carcinoma; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Neoplasms; Carcinoma in Situ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia; Physiological Effects of Drugs; Antineoplastic Agents; Immunologic Factors; Adjuvants, Immunologic; Interferon Inducers; Imiquimod
• Other Study ID Numbers: NMCSD.2014.0040

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: Yes
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No