Efficacy and Safety of AGN-199201 in Patients With Persistent Erythema Associated With Rosacea

November 15, 2019 updated by: Allergan
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of AGN-199201 once daily compared to vehicle for the treatment of persistent moderate to severe facial erythema associated with rosacea.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

440

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

-Moderate to severe persistent facial erythema associated with rosacea.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Greater than 3 inflammatory lesions on the face
  • Current treatment with monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors
  • Raynaud's syndrome, narrow angle glaucoma, orthostatic hypotension, scleroderma or Sjogren's syndrome.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AGN-199201
AGN-199201 applied to the face once daily for 29 days.
AGN-199201 applied to the face once daily for 29 days.
Placebo Comparator: Vehicle
Vehicle to AGN-199201 applied to the face once daily for 29 days.
Vehicle to AGN-199201 applied to the face once daily for 29 days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on Both Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Subject Satisfaction Assessment (SSA) 5-point Scales
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 29 (Hours 3, 6, 9, and 12)
The investigator assessed the patient's overall severity of erythema in the treatment area on the 5 point CEA scale (ranging from 0=clear skin with no signs of erythema to 4=severe erythema/fiery redness). The patient assessed the overall severity of rosacea facial redness in the treatment area on the 5 point SSA scale (ranging from 0=no signs of unwanted redness to 4=severe redness). The percentage of patients with at least a 2 grade decrease (improvement) on both CEA and SSA from baseline was evaluated over the 12-hour evaluation period (hours 3, 6, 9, and 12) postdose on day 29. Baseline was defined as the measurement at predose on Day 1.
Baseline, Day 29 (Hours 3, 6, 9, and 12)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients With at Least a 2-Grade Decrease From Baseline on the SSA 5-point Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 29 (Hours 3, 6, 9, and 12)
The patient assessed the overall severity of rosacea facial redness in the treatment area on the 5 point SSA scale (ranging from 0=no signs of unwanted redness to 4=severe redness). The percentage of patients with at least a 2 grade decrease (improvement) from baseline was evaluated over the 12-hour evaluation period (hours 3, 6, 9, and 12) postdose on day 29. Baseline was defined as the measurement at predose on Day 1.
Baseline, Day 29 (Hours 3, 6, 9, and 12)
Percent Change From Baseline in Rosacea Facial Redness as Measured by Digital Imaging Analysis (DIA)
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 29 (Hours 3, 6, 9, and 12)
Rosacea facial redness in the treatment area was measured by DIA. The percent change was evaluated over the 12-hour evaluation period (hours 3, 6, 9, and 12) postdose on Day 29. Baseline was defined as the measurement at predose on Day 1. A negative number change from baseline indicates a decrease in facial redness (improvement), and a positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in facial redness (worsening).
Baseline, Day 29 (Hours 3, 6, 9, and 12)
Percentage of Patients Reporting Treatment Satisfaction on the Satisfaction Assessment for Rosacea Facial Redness (SA-RFR) Questionnaire Item 9
Time Frame: Day 29 (Hours 3, 6, 9, and 12)
The SA-RFR questionnaire item 9 is completed by patients assessing treatment satisfaction on facial redness. Patients reporting treatment satisfaction as "very satisfied" or "satisfied" are noted. The percentage of patients was evaluated over the 12-hour evaluation period (hours 3, 6, 9, and 12) postdose on Day 29.
Day 29 (Hours 3, 6, 9, and 12)
Change From Baseline on the SA-RFR Questionnaire Item #4
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 29 (Hours 3, 6, 9, and 12)
The SA-RFR questionnaire item 4 is completed by patients assessing how much their face burned due to facial redness on a 5 point scale (range 0=does not burn at all and 4=burns a lot). Patients were evaluated over the 12-hour evaluation period (hours 3, 6, 9, and 12) postdose on Day 29. A lower score change from baseline (negative number) indicates a decrease in facial redness (improvement), and a higher score change from baseline (positive number) indicates an increase in facial burning (worsening).
Baseline, Day 29 (Hours 3, 6, 9, and 12)
Percentage of Patients With at Least a 1-Grade Decrease From Baseline on the SSA 5-point Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 1 (Hour 1)
The patient assessed the overall severity of rosacea facial redness in the treatment area on the 5 point SSA scale (ranging from 0=no signs of unwanted redness to 4=severe redness). The percentage of patients with at least a 1 grade decrease (improvement) on the SSA from baseline at Day 1 hour 1. Baseline was defined as the measurement at predose on Day 1.
Baseline, Day 1 (Hour 1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

May 6, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 199201-004

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Erythema

Clinical Trials on AGN-199201

3
Subscribe