Surfactant Via Endotracheal Tube vs. Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) in Preterm Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome

August 25, 2023 updated by: Joaquim M.B. Pinheiro, Albany Medical College

Efficacy of Rescue Surfactant Delivery Via Endotracheal Intubation (INSURE Technique) Versus Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) in Preterm Neonates

In this study, newborn babies with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), receiving oxygen via nasal continuous airway pressure (CPAP) modalities, and needing surfactant treatment will be randomized to standard delivery of surfactant via and endotracheal tube airway (inserted after pre-medication for pain with a short-acting narcotic), or to surfactant delivery via laryngeal mask airway (LMA). The intent is to remove the airways and return babies to non-invasive CPAP support, after surfactant is given. The primary outcome measure is the rate of failure of initial surfactant therapy. Standardized failure criteria are reached: a) early, if the baby is unable to be placed back on non-invasive CPAP (i.e., needs tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation) or, b) late, if the baby requires ventilation, retreatment with surfactant within 8 hours or more than 2 doses of surfactant.

The objective of this protocol is to reduce the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in preterm neonates with RDS needing rescue surfactant therapy by instilling surfactant though an LMA, while achieving comparable efficacy of surfactant treatment.

The hypothesis is that surfactant treatment through an LMA will decrease the proportion of babies with RDS who require mechanical ventilation or subsequent intubation, when compared to standard surfactant treatment following endotracheal intubation with sedation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) due to deficiency of pulmonary surfactant is common in preterm newborns. Early treatment with surfactant improves oxygenation, reduces the need for subsequent mechanical ventilation, decreases the incidence of pulmonary air leaks and chronic lung disease and it also reduces mortality in extremely premature newborns. Optimal treatment of RDS includes surfactant therapy and avoidance of invasive mechanical ventilation by using nasal continuous positive airway pressure modes (NCPAP or NIPPV). The current standard method of surfactant delivery requires tracheal intubation and at least brief positive-pressure ventilation, as in the INSURE (Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation) approach. Because tracheal intubation causes pain and vagal-mediated physiologic instability in neonates, premedication with atropine and a narcotic is recommended. However, narcotic premedication increases respiratory depression, which may require sustained mechanical ventilation, thus contributing to the failure of INSURE. In a recent trial at our center, standard pretreatment with morphine and atropine was associated with failure of INSURE in more than 2/3 of patients. Consequently, we have recently changed our standard premedication for INSURE to the combination of atropine and remifentanil (a rapid onset, short-acting narcotic). The Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) is a commercially available, less invasive artificial airway that does not need to be inserted into the trachea; it is FDA-approved for use in neonates; preliminary data suggest that it can be used for surfactant administration, which in our trial was associated with a lower failure rate than the morphine plus INSURE approach.

The main objective of this study protocol is reduce the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in preterm neonates with mild to moderate RDS needing rescue surfactant therapy by instilling surfactant though an LMA. A second objective is to compare the efficacy of surfactant administered via LMA versus endotracheal tube (ETT) in decreasing the severity of RDS. Additionally, we will further evaluate the safety of surfactant administration via LMA.

The primary hypothesis is that surfactant therapy delivered via LMA is not inferior to surfactant therapy delivered via transient intubation (INSURE technique) with short-acting narcotic premedication for mild to moderate RDS in preterm neonates.

This randomized controlled trial will include babies with mild-to-moderate RDS, less than 48 hours of age, with gestational age 27 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks, treated with NCPAP (or other NIPPV modality) ≥ 5 cm H2O and FiO2 between 0.30 and 0.60 for at least 2 hours to maintain oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) 90-95%.

After informed consent is obtained, babies are randomly assigned (from sealed, opaque, consecutively numbered envelopes), to "ETT" or "LMA" groups. The "ETT" group is managed according to our current INSURE approach to surfactant therapy (endotracheal intubation following premedication with atropine + remifentanil), whereas the "LMA" group will be pre-medicated with atropine before LMA insertion for surfactant administration.

Both groups will receive Infasurf (3mL/kg) instilled in 2 aliquots via their respective airway, followed by PPV for at least 5 minutes. The artificial airway will be removed and the patient returned to NCPAP/NIPPV by 15 minutes, if spontaneous respirations are adequate. Indications for surfactant re-dosing and mechanical ventilation will be equivalent for both groups. Babies will continue or initiate assisted ventilation via ETT if any of the following occurs:

  • Persistent apnea;
  • Severe retractions;
  • Inability to wean FiO2 < 60%

Criteria for re-dosing with surfactant:

  1. Within 8 hours after first dose of surfactant:

    • FiO2 20% higher than the baseline FiO2, after excluding other obvious causes of respiratory insufficiency such as pneumothorax.

    If early re-dosing of surfactant is needed in patients of either group, it will be administered via ETT (i.e., LMA patients will be intubated, and will receive the dose of surfactant via ETT)

  2. Beyond 8 hours of the first dose of surfactant:

    • FiO2 is ≥ 60%, or;
    • FiO2 is ≥ 30% associated with worsening clinical signs of RDS.

If late re-dosing is needed in patients of the LMA group, use of the LMA is permitted for the second dose. In the ETT group, all doses are given via the ETT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

93

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Albany, New York, United States, 12208
        • Albany Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 1 year (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mild-to-moderate RDS;
  • Postnatal age 2 to 48 hours;
  • Gestational age 27 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks;
  • Treated with nasal CPAP modalities ≥ 5 cm H2O and FiO2 between 0.30 and 0.60 for at least 2 hours to maintain SpO2 90-95%;
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Weight < 800 g;
  • Airway anomalies;
  • Pulmonary air leaks;
  • Craniofacial or cardiothoracic malformations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Endotracheal intubation
Endotracheal intubation for surfactant administration, following remifentanil and atropine pre-medication
Other Names:
  • INSURE
additional premedication in the endotracheal intubation/INSURE arm
Experimental: Laryngeal mask airway
Laryngeal mask airway insertion for surfactant administration, following atropine pre-medication
Other Names:
  • LMA North America

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Failing to Avoid Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
Time Frame: 120 hours
Failure of surfactant therapy in avoiding invasive mechanical ventilation or clinically equivalent outcomes (FiO2 > 0.60 to maintain target SpO2, second dose of surfactant within 8 hours, or more than 2 total doses of surfactant)
120 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Surfactant Doses
Time Frame: 120 hours
Mean number of surfactant doses per patient
120 hours
Days on Any Respiratory Support
Time Frame: 3 months
Days on any respiratory support (i.e., other than breathing room air)
3 months
Rate of Pneumothorax
Time Frame: 120 hours
proportion of participants with pneumothorax diagnosed radiologically or by transillumination
120 hours
Rate of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (O2 Dependence at the Later of 28 Days of Age or 36 Weeks Postmenstrual Age)
Time Frame: 3 months
Defined as oxygen requirement at 36 weeks postmenstrual age if gestational age less than 33 weeks, or beyond 28 days of age if gestational age greater than 32 weeks
3 months
Number of Participants With Complications During Insertion of LMA or Endotracheal Tube
Time Frame: 120 hours
bradycardia, airway obstruction, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation
120 hours
Mortality Rate
Time Frame: 3 months
Mortality prior to hospital discharge (any cause)
3 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Early Failure of Surfactant Therapy
Time Frame: 1 hour
need of mechanical ventilation within 1 hour of surfactant therapy
1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joaquim M Pinheiro, MD, MPH, Albany Medical College

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 20, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

June 17, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn

Clinical Trials on Endotracheal intubation

3
Subscribe